Yes, I do delete any messages using such abusive language.
N**** R****** C**** B**** F***
These are vulgar hateful words attacking historically oppressed people. There's nothing surprising that decent, moral, just people would delete such vulgar hateful words. What's surprising is people claiming to follow the God who sides with the oppressed would do so.
Those aren't words. They're letters with asterisks after them. But thanks for letting me know I can't use those letters with asterisks after them at your Blog of Lies and Perversions. I won't use them.
How can words attack people, even if they're actual words and not merely letters with asterisks after them?
What is someone doesn't regard as word as vulgar even if panty waists like Dan does? Sounds rather subjective to me.
"There's nothing surprising that decent, moral, just people would delete such vulgar hateful words."
Or that Dan does, too.
"What's surprising is people claiming to follow the God who sides with the oppressed would do so."
I think this is a typo ("oppressed"), but Dan's false claim that anyone here sides with actual oppressors isn't. Dan's all about lying and perverting the truth.
Sticks and stones... was all one big lie according to the Dan's of the world. Words are mean and can attack people.
It's not surprising at all that Dan uses his holier than thou, look how moral I am, bullshit to justify deleting comments. Especially given his vitriol elesewhere.
I think that Dan is saying that the "oppressed" LGBs are actually "oppressing" the "TQ+XYZPDQ"s by using mean words. It doesn't make much sense, but I think that's his point. The oppression hierarchy.
Yes, I do delete any messages using such abusive language.
ReplyDeleteN****
R******
C****
B****
F***
These are vulgar hateful words attacking historically oppressed people. There's nothing surprising that decent, moral, just people would delete such vulgar hateful words. What's surprising is people claiming to follow the God who sides with the oppressed would do so.
Yes, yes you do. Although I suspect that if a black person used the "N word" you'd allow it.
DeleteHey, I'm just listening to gay voices.
Those aren't words. They're letters with asterisks after them. But thanks for letting me know I can't use those letters with asterisks after them at your Blog of Lies and Perversions. I won't use them.
DeleteHow can words attack people, even if they're actual words and not merely letters with asterisks after them?
What is someone doesn't regard as word as vulgar even if panty waists like Dan does? Sounds rather subjective to me.
"There's nothing surprising that decent, moral, just people would delete such vulgar hateful words."
Or that Dan does, too.
"What's surprising is people claiming to follow the God who sides with the oppressed would do so."
I think this is a typo ("oppressed"), but Dan's false claim that anyone here sides with actual oppressors isn't. Dan's all about lying and perverting the truth.
Art,
DeleteGood point, they aren't words.
Sticks and stones... was all one big lie according to the Dan's of the world. Words are mean and can attack people.
It's not surprising at all that Dan uses his holier than thou, look how moral I am, bullshit to justify deleting comments. Especially given his vitriol elesewhere.
I think that Dan is saying that the "oppressed" LGBs are actually "oppressing" the "TQ+XYZPDQ"s by using mean words. It doesn't make much sense, but I think that's his point. The oppression hierarchy.