John Shuck Made Me Do thiS

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Industrial Money Laundering

https://x.com/roddmartin/status/2046937089795584412?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

https://www.rodmartin.org/p/the-noose-tightens-on-actblue-and

"I TOLD YOU THEY WERE GUILTY. The noose is tightening on ActBlue — and the Democrats have a massive problem. So bad that top ActBlue officials pled the Fifth an incredible 146 times! ActBlue — the Democrat fundraising juggernaut that poured over $16 BILLION into their candidates and causes — is now exposed for vast illegal foreign donations, money laundering, “election interference,” and illegal straw-donor schemes… followed by a massive cover-up to keep Congress and the DOJ in the dark. House Republicans just released a devastating interim staff report from the Administration, Oversight, and Judiciary Committees. What they uncovered is every bit as bad as I’ve been warning you. Two ActBlue officials, including Alyssa Twomey (their former VP of Customer Service who oversaw fraud prevention during the 2024 cycle), plus three former company lawyers, refused to answer EVEN ONE substantive question under oath. They invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination a staggering 146 TIMES. Even worse? The report reveals the entire legal and compliance team “appears to have left the platform after the 2024 election because of its ‘knowing and willful’ acceptance of illegal foreign contributions, and the subsequent cover-up.” House Chairmen Bryan Steil, James Comer, and Jim Jordan also allege that CEO Regina Wallace-Wells made false statements to Congress — and that ActBlue withheld subpoenaed documents (some of which were discovered by the leftwing New York Times: ouch!). This is not a fishing expedition, and it won't end in a "strongly worded letter." This is the walls closing in. 1. The DOJ has opened a full criminal investigation into ActBlue’s role in facilitating foreign interference in U.S. elections. 2. 19 state attorneys general are actively investigating ActBlue for fraudulent fundraising, potential money laundering, and misuse of donor identities. 3. On Monday, Texas AG Ken Paxton filed a landmark civil lawsuit against them. The numbers aren’t small. We’re talking thousands of donations from foreign IP addresses using prepaid cards — the perfect vehicle for money laundering. Some of ActBlue's straw donors even "gave" thousands of separate donations EACH over just a few days. Wait, what?! The question is no longer whether ActBlue is corrupt. The question is: how deep does the rot go, and how far up the Democrat food chain does it reach? Serious people could be facing serious prison time. And Democrat fundraising could collapse if they’re suddenly forced to rely only on legitimate donors — especially while the giant taxpayer-funded Democrat slush funds (USAID, NED, EPA, Planned Parenthood, etc.) are being cut off left and right. They thought they were untouchable. They acted like it. Big mistake. Full Deep Dive (with all the receipts) is in my reply 👇 RT if you want real election integrity in 2026.""

From Last Week's Sermon

Early in a long serioes on the SOTM, and discussing Matt 5:11-12

"In the way of Jesus, a blessed life begins when self-sufficiency ends."

"The greatest threat is not being persecuted for Jesus, but in arranging our lives so that we will not have to."

It's A Lot, But I Wanted To Get Caught Up Before I Left Town

https://x.com/moredge_insight/status/2045083922648776894?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

3 presidents or wannabe presidents all said they'd do exactly what Trump is doing. Hypocrisy much?

https://x.com/sola_chad/status/2045192087520375055?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Trump needs to cut ties with her.

https://x.com/ila_newsx/status/2044946494961385778?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

""Love they neighbor" does not mean "open the gates for an invading army." It is asinine to imply that it does. Bishop Schneider: "They are not refugees, they are invaders who want to Islamize Europe. They want to destroy historical culture in Europe.”"

https://x.com/grey4626/status/2044934513352929443?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Gerrymandering 101

"@RepJeffries , I have a quick civics lesson for you, and I am going to need you to sit with this one. The word "gerrymander" is not named after Donald Trump. It is not named after Ron DeSantis. It is named after Governor Elbridge Gerry -- a Democratic-Republican -- who in 1812 carved Massachusetts senate districts into shapes so grotesque that the Boston Gazette compared one to a salamander and named the practice after HIM. The Democratic-Republican Party. You know -- the direct ancestor of YOUR party. Democrats did not defeat a gerrymandering scheme tonight. Democrats defended the tradition their own party INVENTED, named, and has been running for 213 years. "Maximum warfare, everywhere, all the time" -- from the man whose party literally put their leader's name on the word for election manipulation. The projection is so consistent it qualifies as a renewable energy source. Quinn's Law #2, for those keeping score at home: whatever liberals accuse conservatives of doing is precisely what they are already doing themselves. @RepJeffries did not just illustrate that law tonight. He BECAME it. He is the law now. Walking around. With checkmarks. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who knows that when you name something after yourself, you own it." FYI, the VA gerrymander attempt will very likely be caught up in court challenges for multiple issues until long after the midterms, and likely after 2028 elections"

Mike Bseki

Climate, Science, Panic, Etc

https://x.com/electroversenet/status/2046544478547460224?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Dr. "Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science at MIT, says global warming fear isn't driven by data, but by money and control. He recently told the Daily Mail that politicians saw climate policy as a multi-trillion dollar opportunity to reshape industries, to push globalization. The public was fed panic over a minuscule temperature change that means almost nothing. Lindzen calculates that even a doubling of CO2 would warm the planet by only half a degree. He argues nature stabilizes, not amplifies, climate swings, and that today's warmth and CO2 levels actually help plants grow and expand farmland. "People are finally starting to question this," he said. "It'll be an embarrassment to our era.""

https://x.com/chrismartzwx/status/2046649779539550475?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"How do I know that the climate *crisis* is a scam? Here are five reasons:

1️⃣ None of the politicians, celebrities, or “scientists” yammering about it have altered their lifestyles an inch. If they opted to forgo using O&G products, then I’d take them seriously. Actions speak louder than words.

2️⃣ Climate conferences aren’t being held virtually on Zoom using their large meeting extensions. It’s doable, they just choose not to. They like to fly overseas to lecture us about reducing our “carbon footprint” all the while they do nothing to lower their own.

3️⃣ Wealthier alarmists are still living on or buying oceanfront property. If ocean levels were really rising at a catastrophic rate (as opposed to the gradual increase that is actually occurring), then they would move inland and banks would not approve loans.

4️⃣ Alarmists rarely, if ever criticize China and India, and they always come up with all sorts of wonderful excuses as to why those nations get a free pass to continue emitting so-called “carbon pollution.”

5️⃣ The only solutions they offer involve increased governmental power. Higher taxes. EV mandates. Restrictions or bans on the energy sectors they don’t like.

And, as an added bonus, no real-world data proves, much less suggests that we are facing an “existential crisis.” Even the IPCC doesn’t use such rhetoric because it isn’t based on science. I don’t deny that climate change exists. It always has. And, I don’t even deny that at least some of the increase in temperatures is anthropogenic. But I just don’t care because it isn’t that big of a deal. Extreme weather cannot be taxed away. Our vulnerability will continue to increase so long as we build in disaster-prone areas. Politicians cannot take our wallets and set a thermostat on the planet."

More Bits

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DXID9RkAnYp/

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DXXTzH6gn4u/

https://x.com/wallstreetapes/status/2046980358856737244?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

More MN fraud.

https://x.com/basedmikelee/status/2046311256823607676?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Pastor: “I’m of the opinion that we need a third testament because the Bible has become problematic.”" Kinda sounds familair, doesn't it?

https://x.com/MorseReport/status/2045557690953507095 https://x.com/shaunmmaguire/status/2046285531924033819?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Top Democrat political consultant and campaign strategist, James Carville, just stated on the Left-wing ‘Policon’ podcast that when the Democrats regain power, they plan to: -Grant statehood to Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, so that the Democrats can unlock 4 extra seats in the Senate. -Pack the U.S. Supreme Court from 9 Justices up to 13 Justices, adding another 4 Left-wing Justices to the court. -Reopen the U.S.-Mexico border and grant mass-amnesty to every single alien currently inside of the United States. -His advice to Democrat politicians: “Don’t run on it. Don’t talk about it. Just do it.”"

Dan will vote for this crap in a heartbeat.

https://x.com/alecstapp/status/2046038041429500031?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

For some reason, people like Dan, rever this crap.

https://x.com/MarcoFoster_/status/2045880876081262625

"Zohran Mamdani: “I wish the words of Tupac from the 90’s weren’t still prescient, but they continue to be true for too many which is that we always have money for war and not to feed the poor”"

https://x.com/leighwolf/status/2046041550765842937?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw "We spend 66% of our money on social welfare and education. 8% goes to the military. 9% goes to paying interest on the debt incurred by funding the 66%."

https://x.com/wil_da_beast630/status/2044965993487778162?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

The silence of the ASPL is deafening when it comes to atrocities by Iran.

https://x.com/c_3c_3/status/2044855719887855635?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

This is what passes for justice on the left.

Christian Marriage

https://x.com/nancyrpearcey/status/2045181477139230846?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"It was not easy for any Christians to take the biblical view of marriage seriously: "Such even-handed treatment was genuinely novel, and it was not easy for men to embrace. In the fourth century, Augustine was still preaching sermons on why it was not acceptable for men to commit adultery with their slaves—which, he observed, was “a daily occurrence.” He warned Christian husbands that their wives would hold them accountable for their sexual sin. He also warned wives that in response to being held accountable, husbands may grow angry and abusive: 'Supposing today someone has to put up with rather more sharpness from his wife and more open grumbling than usual, because she used to assume that it was all right for her husband [to commit adultery with his slaves], and now she has heard in church that it is not all right for her husband; so if he has to endure his wife grumbling more freely, and saying to him, 'What you are doing is not right. We both heard him saying so. We are both Christians. Give me the same as you require of me. I owe you fidelity, you owe me fidelity, we both owe Christ fidelity...' When he hears things like that which he is not used to, he gets angry, he becomes abusive.' But Augustine did not let these angry husbands off the hook. He admonished them to hold themselves to the same standard of fidelity that they expected of their wives: “You are told, 'You shall not commit adultery' (Exodus 20:14); that is, do not go to any other woman except your wife. But what you do is demand this duty from your wife, while declining to pay this duty to your wife.” In this way, Christianity laid out a complete mutuality in conjugal rights. As sociologist Rodney Stark explains, it was a symmetry “at total variance … with pagan culture.” As a result, “the Christian woman enjoyed far greater marital security and equality than did her pagan neighbor.” Stark concludes, “Christianity was unusually appealing because within the Christian subculture women enjoyed far higher status than did women in the Greco-Roman world at large.”" https://x.com/nancyrpearcey/status/2044927670236938412?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw "Why Christian Marriage Was Revolutionary "To appreciate how unique the Christian view of marriage is, we need to set it against the ancient Greco-Roman culture into which the church was born. In the ancient world, sexual promiscuity among men was widespread and socially accepted. The purpose of a wife was to have legal heirs, but it was expected that men would have sex with prostitutes, mistresses, concubines, and, most of all, with their slaves—male and female, children and adults. Demosthenes famously said, “We keep prostitutes for pleasure. We keep mistresses for the day-to-day needs of the body. We keep wives for the begetting of children and for the faithful guardianship of our homes.” Wives sometimes protested, but they were told they had no choice but to accept their husband’s promiscuity.... Men could accuse their wives of adultery, but since it was thought acceptable for men to have sex outside of marriage, wives could not accuse their husbands of adultery. Cato declared, “If you catch your wife in adultery, you can kill her with impunity; she, however, cannot dare to lay a finger on you if you commit adultery. It is the law.” In this historical context, Christianity was nothing short of revolutionary. At its core was a new form of sexual equality. To the shock of the ancient world, both sexes were held to the same moral standard. Christianity condemned promiscuity among men as well as women. It stood out as radically different because it taught that a husband actually wrongs his wife by committing adultery. Jesus said, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery” (Mark 10:11–12). Such even-handed treatment was genuinely novel.""

https://x.com/BiblicalBeauty/status/2044857608709058799

"Historian Tom Holland explaining the revolutionary impact Christianity made on gender and sexuality which is so often taken for granted now in the West: "Because of Christianity, I mean, I think every society has had an idea of binaries, that in sex there are two roles that people have to play to have sex, and for us, it's based on gender. It's based on the idea of there being men and women and that's again an inheritance ultimately from Genesis, God creating men and women separate. But for the Romans, that wasn't the case. For the Romans, the binary was between the male Roman citizen and everybody else, and the male Roman citizen could do what he liked to everybody else... So you know you're a Roman slave owner, you can do what you like to your slaves sexually, any it doesn't matter what the gender of the slave is. It doesn't matter what the age is. You can just treat them as you want, and of course Christianity radically, radically changes that. And you know, if you are a scullery maid in a Roman household (a bit like a Yazidi girl in an Isis household), there's nothing to stop you being raped every day. Nothing to stop you. No legal power, I mean, no sense of moral disapproval at all, and so you can imagine the radical effect of getting a letter from Paul being told, 'you are the like the church.' It's utterly transformative.""