Well, it looks like SCOTUS just agreed that mail in ballots can be counted after election day and that Trump nominee ACB wrote the majority opinion.
The record of Trump SCOTUS nominees has not be what conservatives thought it would be. They provided the margin to overturn Roe, and not the margin to overturn elections.
We need a massive overhaul of how we conduct elections.
https://x.com/chrismurphyct/status/2070230760196624429?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/BskiMike22802/status/2071408668244160617
" Wow,
. You just come right out and announce you are a racist... out loud. Not even trying to hide it. The minimum wage is one of the most racist policy instruments in American history, Senator — and you just introduced legislation to TRIPLE it. Congratulations. That is a special kind of brazen. Allow me to educate you, since your staff apparently has the historical awareness of a participation trophy. The minimum wage was championed by progressive eugenicists in the early 20th century — the intellectual ancestors of YOUR party — specifically engineered to price Black Americans, immigrants, and the disabled out of the labor market. They called those workers "unemployables." Princeton economist Thomas Leonard documented this exhaustively. Sidney and Beatrice Webb, heroes of the progressive movement, argued openly that a wage floor set high enough would function as "social cleansing." Their words. Not mine. Union leaders were more direct. They stated flatly that minimum wage rules removed "the incentive for employing the Negro." Primary source. Direct quote. The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931? Texas Representative Martin Dies said it on the floor of the United States Congress — it is in the Congressional Record — "you cannot prescribe the same wages for the Black man as the White man." Southern Democrats pushed it through. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 — the law that created the federal minimum wage — excluded agricultural and domestic workers at the explicit demand of Southern Democrats, because that was where Black labor was concentrated in the Jim Crow South. Under a Democratic president. Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman called the minimum wage "the most anti-Negro law on our statute books" in 1966. And here you are in 2025, in case you don't have enough of a leak in the think tank already, pushing it to $25 an hour. Let me do the math your speechwriter apparently skipped: $25 an hour is approximately $52,000 per year before employer-side payroll taxes and mandatory benefits. At that price, a 17-year-old with no resume and no work history is flat-out unemployable. Not because employers are heartless — because no rational business pays $52,000 a year for someone who requires six months of training before they produce a dollar of value. A 2006 review by economists Neumark and Wascher examined more than 100 minimum wage studies. Two-thirds showed NEGATIVE employment effects. Research in South Carolina found minimum wage increases reduced employment by 8.9% for teenagers and 15.5% for workers WITHOUT a high school diploma. The CBO estimated that even a $17 minimum wage would push 350,000 workers entirely out of the labor force. You want $25. Here is what $25 does: McDonald's finishes the kiosk rollout. Walmart doubles down on self-checkout. The young man or woman who needed that FIRST JOB to build a resume, earn a reference, and get their foot on the first rung of the economic ladder — gets absolutely nothing. No experience. No references. No second job. Just the welfare line. Which is, of course, exactly where a textbook snollygoster like you needs them to stay. Dependent. Desperate. Reliably voting for whoever promises the next handout. Senator, what have you ACTUALLY done for the people of Connecticut? Because this policy does not lift workers. It removes the bottom rung of the ladder, hands it to the automation industry, and calls the whole arrangement compassion. Quinn's Law Number One: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent." Quinn's Law Number 25: "Liberals are great at giving away other people's money." But what do I know — I am only a science teacher who actually read the history and the economic studies instead of the fundraising email."https://x.com/saltygoat17/status/2070887878906048728?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/rising_serpent/status/2070896889633935412?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" How is it that American citizens can't afford a home while 30% of TPS recipients have mortgages while at the same time 51% of their households receive at least one form of welfare benefit? Do you understand how impossible this is without your government being a co-conspirator in fraud?"
https://x.com/westernlensman/status/2071583573681791391?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" January 2010. Obama’s DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano announces that she signed the Haitian TPS order: "It will be good for 18 months from the date of the issuance. So that will be in July of 2011." That's how it was introduced. 16 years ago. Full Clip Transcript: "Lastly, as has been widely reported yesterday, I signed the order beginning for the process of TPS status for Haitians already in the United States. This is a kind of an intermediate immigration status that allows those who are here to remain and to work, and as they work, of course, many send remittances back home. This in and of itself, is a form of support to Haiti and a form of economic assistance to Haiti. To qualify, you must have been in the United States before January the 12th, the date of the earthquake. It will be good for 18 months from the date of the issuance. So that will be in July of 2011. So for Haitians in the country who were here before the earthquake, we are now opening up the process of TPS, that intermediate immigration status for you.""
https://x.com/MendlovitzMark/status/2070558583293636902
" I've been told by a friend from Ohio that one of the reasons the elites are so hysterical about Haitians having to go home, even some Republicans, is apartment owners love renting to them, especially if they are paying government-subsidized rents. Think about the insanity of that. We are subsidizing the rents of foreign nationals, driving up the cost of housing for native Americans by diminishing supply and increasing demand. That is as un-American as anything our government could do to us."
https://x.com/alicianieves__/status/2070650275736539216?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" This actually gets at the heart of the question “why can’t we stop mass migration, even when the people coming require so much state welfare?”. That’s actually the point. Not only do big businesses benefit from having “asylum” seekers as cheap labor, but there’s now an entire economy downstream from the state welfare being used to support these foreign nationals—NGOs, apartment owners, school systems, cities getting federal money for social programs for them. The abuse of humanitarian pathways of migration (which are actually unconstitutional btw) opened the door for a multi-million dollar economy that discovered a way to extract money from the federal and state governments. This is why the British are unsuccessful at stopping the boats of obvious economic migrant men from coming — there’s now at least 30 people employed to “help” each of these men, mainly single young women with low earning potential liberal arts degrees. These beneficiaries will fight to the death to keep mass migration bc they need these kind of social service jobs to live comfortable independent lives. The ongoing unemployment of USAID workers is a scary reminder to thousands of them that their lives will be harder for them without mass migration."
https://x.com/ocraziocornpop/status/2070696715154268196?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"Trump, 2018: "Haiti is a sh!thole country." Hollywood Libs: "Haiti is a great, truly beautiful country. Trump is a r*cist!" Trump (& SCOTUS), 2026: "Temporary means temporary, Haitians have to return home to their great, truly beautiful country." Hollywood Libs: "Haiti is a sh!thole country. They must be allowed to stay forever." CHECKMATE, LIBTARDS. WHY ARE HOLLYWOOD LIBS LIKE THIS?"
https://x.com/elsathora/status/2070753121018540375?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"Nobody who ever met Jesus ever had a moderate reaction to him…They either hated him and wanted to kill him, they were afraid of him and wanted to run away, or they were absolutely smitten with him and they tried to give their whole lives to him."
(J. Stott)
The strange thing is that the Jesus portrayed by many who profess Christ today doesn't provoke any of these reactions.
https://x.com/swipewright/status/2070180767699771559?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" Defenders of child transition need to answer a basic question: What evidence would change your mind? We were told not to worry because such treatments and procedures were extremely rare. But when new data show that these treatments aren't so rare, the same defenders suddenly change their tune: the numbers are no longer reassuring because they are small; now they are reassuring because they are large. If the rates are low, that proves the panic is overblown. If the rates are high, that's evidence that access is improving. If the rates rise, that means stigma is declining. If they don't rise enough, that means barriers remain. Heads they win, tails you're a bigot. At some point, defenders of pediatric gender medicine must answer a simple question: What result would change your mind? We should have insisted on a clear answer to this question long ago, BEFORE we ever started performing these procedures on children—not AFTER the results come in, when activists have had time to devise post hoc explanations about why the latest horrific finding is actually wonderful news. Falsifiability is a basic principle of science. No claim that can be "confirmed" by every possible outcome can be called scientific. This failure to adhere to basic principles of science is made even more sinister given that kids are having their puberty stunted, fertility compromised, and healthy body parts altered or removed as a result."
https://www.city-journal.org/article/oregon-study-pediatric-gender-medicine-transition
