John Shuck Made Me Do thiS

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

BOT

https://x.com/femcondition/status/2098781510577139842?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" On the Clancy holdout juror: You know what else other jurors said? That it was 10-2, 2 being guilty, and they were slowly badgered down to changing their vote. I am NOT speaking to dv allegations or supporting it here, but the facts are: -The DV charges were dropped. The man was NOT legally barred from serving on a jury. -The DV allegations occurred in 2021. -The restraining order filed by the now 18 or 19 year old (at the time of the alleged assault) did not involve an arrest or conviction. He didn't "punch a 13 yo in the face." -Massachusetts population is 10% black. Just think about that. -This man is being doxed and hounded by the press. Theyre discussing his eviction and finances. Do you REALLY believe there's spotless records for the remaining 11? Not a single dui, speeding, quite possibly another dv charge, bankruptcy, eviction, collections, etc? No investigation by child services? We don't know, because no one is invading their pasts and publishing it like it's headline news. They're all white and voted "the right way."'

https://x.com/majtoure/status/2098779849791791558?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" In less than 24 hours, media showed why we call it the Most Effective Devil In America. We found out this week that the lone holdout in the Lindsay Clancy case… The one juror who refused to sign off on "not criminally responsible." For not backing up a woman who killed her three children…. Is a Black man. We watched Gayle King glitch live on air when she found that out. "I have to sit with that for a second." Sit with what, Gayle? Sit with the fact that this man had the moral clarity 11 other people in that room didn't? Within 24 hours, that same media machine had a new headline ready. Domestic violence allegations. Not a conviction. An allegation. A charge that was dismissed years ago. I know a little something about having an allegation weaponized against me and THIS IS THAT. The second he stepped outside a narrative some “journalist” started writing. This man isn't even a public figure. No name attached. And they still found a way to build the villain arc before the ink was dry. This is a decaying society that will find a way to make you the villain for defending a child's right to exist. We watch politicians frame the ending of a child’s life in the wombs as a "right." So it's not far fetched that a man defending the sanctity of child's lives gets cast as the problem. Eleven jurors needed a more complicated story than the one in front of them. Were three children killed? Yes. Who admitted to killing them? Their mother. That's not complicated. They just needed it to be. This isn't a shot at the mental health crisis or the opioid crisis in this country either. Those are BOTH real. But the same people ready to hang an insanity defense on this won't say a word about who profits off THAT crisis. The same medication issue they say is the reason for these deaths. Good Morning America will still be sponsored by Pfizer. They won't connect that dot. At least publicly. They'll simply paint a righteous man as the villain, because he held a standard too heavy for the room around him. Also because a devil needs a scapegoat. They’ll defend her “innocence” by smearing HIM as the angry, black “woman beater.” But they made sure to throw “allegedly” in there to cover their asses legally. All done because the narrative must be, “Blacks are either victims or villains.” NOT leaders. Not defenders of justice. The irony is laughable when you look at the fuller history of Black Americans. Black America has always been the one pushing for justice inside a nation that wasn't built with us in mind. This isn't new. This is the standard. A Black man standing on principle while 11 people try to paint him as the difficult, noncooperative one? That's not irony. That's just a Tuesday in American history. Don't be surprised he did it. Be ready to protect him for it. Because the backlash is already writing itself and his name isn’t even attached yet. Really reflect on what happened here…. This man shows up for jury duty, stands his ground and changes the direction of how to murder babies and get away with it. That changes the trajectory of that demonic plan entirely. That's why devils are upset. That’s also why civic participation isn't optional. STAY INVOLVED. Pay attention to how these outlets frame the story and you’ll see a very repetitive pattern. A “get down or lay down” route. The tools they use to run this pattern with? - Your ignorance & UN involvement. - The MEDIA. Media is a tool for sure, use it. Don't let it use you. The devil's gonna do what the devil does. The real question is whether you, as a child of God, are doing what you're supposed to. Be safe. Be Solutionary."

https://x.com/billmaher/status/2098609787739226115?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

https://x.com/mattwalshblog/status/2098600948885016780?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"The allegations are not proven and charges were dismissed. But even assuming they’re true: 1) Given that charges were dismissed, they don’t preclude someone from serving on a jury. So there is no newsworthy scandal here at all. If anything, a juror with an alleged history of domestic violence should be all the more sympathetic to Clancy. And yet somehow he was the only one with the moral clarity to find her guilty. 2) These women are really bouncing right from defending a woman who MURDERED ALL OF HER CHILDREN to pretending to be horrified by allegations of domestic violence. These people are beneath contempt."

https://x.com/floppingaces/status/2098772205228421277?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"They were perfectly comfortable condemning the lone Lindsay Clancy holdout juror right up until one inconvenient fact wandered into the room: He was Black. Then the gears started grinding. “I have to sit with that.” “That changes the landscape.” “A lot of us were assuming he was white.” Oh, really? What changed? Same juror. Same vote. Same case. Same evidence. Same dead children. Same decision. His skin color entered the chat, and suddenly the moral calculator needed a reboot. That is intersectional politics in one perfect, embarrassing little scene. These people lecture the country about justice while running every moral question through a demographic spreadsheet. Race. Sex. Sexuality. Religion. Victim ranking. Oppression points. Privilege penalties. Then, after all the boxes are checked, they finally decide who is allowed to be criticized. Apparently “right and wrong” now comes with a dropdown menu. Imagine admitting, out loud, that learning a juror was Black “changes the landscape.” You just told everyone that your judgment depended on the race of the person you were judging. Bravo. You accidentally explained the entire scam. DEI and intersectionality sell themselves as moral progress while training people to abandon universal standards the second tribal identity enters the equation. And when the tribes collide? Cue the sweating, the stammering, the “I need to sit with that.” They built a moral system so stupid it can short-circuit over a skin tone. Same facts. Different identity. Suddenly the ethics change. That is the punchline. And somehow they still want to be taken seriously. (article below)"

https://x.com/wallstreetapes/status/2098543791452143860?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" Mind blowing data: - There been over 65,000 Islam terror attacks since 9/11 across 70 countries - The world’s 4 other major religions, Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism and Buddhism make up 2% of all religiously motivated terror attacks - Muslims are responsible for the other 98% This is what we need to remember on September 11th. The world doesn’t really have a terrorist problem, the world has a Muslim problem. The problem is Islam A breakdown of the over 65,000 million terrorist attacks: Top countries by attack count: - Afghanistan 17,075 - Somalia 10,768 - Iraq 8,209 - Nigeria 3,950 - Syria 3,421 Deadliest groups by deaths attributed: - Taliban 71,965 - Islamic State and branches 69,641 - Boko Haram 26,081 - Al-Shabaab 21,784 - Al-Qaeda 14,856 - Those five account for 82% of deaths Average deaths is about 3.7 deaths per attack This is Islam. Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization."

https://x.com/gunthereagleman/status/2098739314548944930?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" This is Shelly Headen, Democrat running for NC House District 62. She toured Dachau, a Nazi death camp, smiled in front of the ovens, and posted: “This is where Trump supporters belong.” 41,500 people were murdered there. Jews. Priests. POWs. Political prisoners. This CPA running to “restore human decency” used that ground to fantasize about putting half the country in a crematorium. Same woman who wrote America’s “only hope” was an attack on U.S. soil”, preferably Alabama, Louisiana… where the stupid people live.” This is the mask off."

BOT

https://x.com/thevivafrei/status/2099922745287172232?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"An indigenous man in Canada killed a 12-year-old girl and caused permanent brain injuries to her mother in a drunken car wreck. Driving 90 in a 50 zone. Empty beer cans throughout the truck. The judge sentenced him to two years house arrest. No jail. The judge actually wrote this: “He considered how colonialization of the Six Nations band had led to a “major disconnection” to Wilson’s culture that, in turn, led him into “over-consumption of alcohol and unhealthy relationships.” “This crystallized into the tragic events of Feb. 11, 2022,” said Edward. This is real life. In Canada."

The judge was apparently a member of the same "nation" as the drunken murder, which probably had absolutely nothing to do with this sweetheart sentence.

https://x.com/jfromnash_clips/status/2099653957991673882?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Jasmine Crockett screamed “modern-day lynchings” the second Tasia Fortune was found hanging from a tree in Jackson. She wrote the DOJ. She invoked the Klan. She played the race card for cameras. Then they arrested Jarques Ratliff. A black man. 51 years old. Someone she knew. Charged with murder. Bond denied. Both Black. No white mob. No Klan. Just a homicide. Where’s the follow-up, Jasmine? Where’s the press conference now that the “lynching” turned out to be a Black man killing a black woman? This is the grift. Stir racial panic when it fits the narrative. Go silent the second the facts don’t. Tasia’s family got an arrest. Crockett got content, until the content stopped working. Stop weaponizing dead black women for political theater."

https://x.com/rachelmoiselle/status/2099559176078787042?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Ask yourself this: would you tolerate someone who did Blackface this way and give him every benefit of the doubt while the Black community are telling you he is racist? No? Then why are your standards different for Jews? I don’t think anyone should be de-platformed for their political beliefs. Separately, I do believe Macklemore is an antisemite and Jews who don’t want to see an antisemite at an Ed Sheeran concert shouldn’t be scoffed at, even if we may disagree about him being de-platformed. And if you do scoff at them, you are certainly no ‘anti-racist’. Period."

https://x.com/jonahplatt/status/2099588604200948222?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Every antizionist who believes they’re “on the right side of history” while defending a dude who literally does Nazi salutes in Jewface needs to realize how profoundly they have been brainwashed into being the foot soldiers of a global anti-Jew agenda without realizing it."

https://x.com/kate_p45/status/2099569006080295069?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Can we talk about the fact that Democrats just sprinted into court to stop President Trump from enforcing a 144-year-old law that says you don’t get to live here if you’re going to live off American taxpayers? They’re literally suing to keep the welfare tap open for people who aren’t citizens. They don’t even bother hiding it anymore. Their job isn’t representing the citizens of the United States. It’s protecting the people draining the system."

https://x.com/moredge_insight/status/2099750575046893915?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" Everyone posts the same Bill Clinton clip from Camp David in 2000, and I understand why. It is a clean story and it is easy to share. But then the replies start. “You cannot trust Clinton”. “He is American. He is pro-Israel”. “That is not the full picture”. Well then here is Hosni Mubarak, the former president of Egypt, sitting in Cairo and talking about something most people on here have never even heard of. The Mena House conference in 1977. Years before Clinton, and years before the 2000 summit everyone argues about. He says they held a conference there and the Palestinians refused to participate. It wasn’t some complicated diplomatic disagreement. They simply would not even come. He says that every time there was an opportunity they wasted it, and that if they had taken the document that was already on the table and actually negotiated over it, the region would not be in the disaster it is in now. That document, in his account, included the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the West Bank and Gaza. The argument was not even whether Israel would leave. The argument was who would control security during the transitional period. Jordanian and Palestinian forces? Israeli and Palestinian forces? Other Arab forces? He says the Israelis did not mind negotiating those points. Egypt signed a peace agreement and was insulted for it. Then he says the line that should bother people more than any American speech. For fifty years they repeatedly said NO. They said NO After 1948. They said NO After 1967. He says they will keep saying no until there is nothing left to bargain over. This is not an Israeli spokesman and it is not the White House. This is an Egyptian president telling you the walkout did not begin in 2000. It was already a habit long before that."

https://x.com/wearecanproud/status/2099494111703085112?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

"Mark Carney's lawyers in federal court admitted that female inmates in Canadian prisons have been raped by transgender prisoners, but argued that this is a "reasonable limit" on their charter rights to accommodate the "needs of gender diverse inmates.""

Another one of those things that doesn't happen.

https://x.com/misfitpatriot/status/2098650286009053536?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" I guess we finally figured out what crime a black person could commit that was so unforgivable to the left, they wouldn’t be afraid to be labeled as racists by condemning them. Turns out you can stab an innocent girl to death on a train in cold blood , or stab a young man to death at a football game in front of his brother, and if you’re black and they were white, the left will come to your defense and blame systemic racism and oppression for your actions. To the left, when black people commit crimes they’re actually the victim of societal inequality which forces them resort to criminal activity due to lack of opportunity. The left sees the crimes of a minority as a crime of necessity, and until now we really didn’t know where their line was on which crime crosses that line and cant be excused away due to its nature or blamed on someone else due to their situation. So here’s the crime we finally now know is so egregious to the left they’ve deemed it indefensible regardless of the persons skin color, oppression, inequality, or poverty….. The criminal act of unapologetically proclaiming women who admit they intentionally and brutally killed their children are guilty of murder, and then refusing to agree with anyone who tries to convince you it’s not murder. that’s the line the left just drew in the sand. You can murder, rape, steal, call for the death of those you disagree with, join a gang, cartel, or a terrorist organization, riot, assault, stalk, and dox as long as you’re black, poor, illegal, or vote blue no matter who, and the left won’t give a shit. But if you ever tell a woman killing her children inside or outside the womb is evil, murder, and her fault. That’s a bridge too far, because it’s never their fault. That’s why Lindsey Clancy has so much support. If she’s found guilty, so are millions of other women who’ve thought about doing what she did and need to blame something other than themselves to feel like they’re not a terrible mother. The truth is many of them probably are, because hormones might make you a little crazy but if you went far enough to trauma bond with Lindsey Clancy, that wasn’t hormones. You can tell me all day you’re a good mother because you only had thoughts, but not while telling me Lindsey Clancy is too. Lindsey Clancy is guilty of murdering her children, full stop. Just like the juror they all hate now, you’ll never convince me otherwise. Find me guilty of the same crime. Even if they say having the baby she strangled caused a hormone problem, but big pharma is to blame for not fixing it so they could make money. If they tell me it’s a crime not to agree that greedy corporate policy is responsible for the voice in her head demanding she strangle her baby and two toddlers. I’m going to tell each and every one of them Pfizer didn’t wrap an exercise band around an infants neck, she did. Then I’m gonna tell them if they truly still believe its not murder if insanity caused the voice in her head that convinced her to end the life of her children, then they must also believe every woman who walked into a planned parenthood and ended the life of their children is either insane, or a murderer. Every woman who heard their own voice saying it’s better to end the life of their children than to let them live didn’t have to obey any more than Lindsey Clancy did. They convinced themselves it was for the best, because it’s what they wanted to do, and Lindsey Clancy was convinced it was for the best, because it’s what she wanted to do. Murder doesn’t become necessary when the voice inside your head isn’t your own. Just like crime doesn’t become necessary when the criminals skin color isn’t your own. Thanks for coming to my Mansplaining workshop."

Fathers?

https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/2099240850832204213?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" This finding replicates in Census data, but what we have defines fatherlessness in two different ways; based on: - Marriage - Cohabitation Both definitions agree on all directions and nearly on the magnitudes: at the same wealth, education, Black fatherlessness is more common."

Stack

https://x.com/themcmullan/status/2099728266487812187?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" In response to the clip going around with the African lady saying 'WHAT WHITE CULTURE!?!' Because I can explain it in more detail than anyone else... here are the main things that create western civilisation. The principle, the law of nature that is an adaptation to and what operation it creates in our civilisation. THE WESTERN CIVILISATION STACK Western civilisation can be understood as a set of adaptations to the laws of nature that allow millions of people to cooperate, solve problems and innovate together. 1. SOVEREIGNTY — Let people act. Law of nature: Knowledge and ability are distributed among individuals. No ruler or institution can know everything everyone knows. Sovereignty gives people freedom to choose, experiment and solve problems for themselves. That creates millions of independent problem-solvers instead of waiting for one authority to find the answer. 2. RECIPROCITY — Don’t impose your costs on others. Law of nature: Cooperation survives when it benefits both sides. Freedom cannot mean freedom to steal, defraud, injure or force others to carry your costs. Reciprocity means pursuing your interests while respecting the same right in others. It turns conflict into cooperation and makes peaceful life among strangers possible. 3. RESPONSIBILITY — Make people accountable for consequences. Law of nature: Every action produces consequences. Freedom works when the person making a decision also bears responsibility for its results. When people can keep the benefits of their choices while forcing the costs onto others, cooperation breaks down. Responsibility reconnects choice with consequence. 4. PROPERTY — Make control and consequences clear. Law of nature: Resources are scarce and cannot satisfy every competing use at once. Property establishes who controls something, who may use or exchange it, and who bears the consequences of those decisions. That reduces conflict, encourages people to improve what they possess, and makes investment and long-term planning possible. 5. TRUTH — Correct error faster than reality punishes you for it. Law of nature: Reality does not change because we believe something false. Truthful testimony, open criticism and evidence allow people to discover mistakes before those mistakes become catastrophes. A civilisation that can criticize and correct itself can learn faster than one that protects comforting falsehoods. 6. CONTRACT — Make cooperation possible across time. Law of nature: Cooperation requires predictable future behaviour. Promises backed by reputation and law allow strangers to trust one another enough to cooperate. Contract lets one person invest today because another can credibly promise performance tomorrow. That makes enormous networks of specialization, trade and investment possible. 7. RULE OF LAW — Replace arbitrary power with predictable rules. Law of nature: People have conflicting interests, and power creates opportunities for predation. Law provides a common procedure for resolving disputes without violence or personal rule. When rulers and citizens are both constrained by known rules, people can cooperate, invest and experiment without constantly fearing arbitrary interference. 8. DUE PROCESS — Test accusations instead of trusting authority. Law of nature: Human beings are biased, mistaken and sometimes dishonest. An accusation is not proof. Evidence, defense, confrontation, impartial judgment and appeal create an adversarial process for discovering error. Due process protects both society from wrongdoing and individuals from arbitrary punishment. 9. DECENTRALISATION — Let many solutions compete. Law of nature: No one knows in advance which adaptation will work best. Families, firms, towns, institutions and governments can try different solutions to different problems. Failures can remain local while successful solutions spread. Decentralisation therefore turns society itself into a continuous experiment. 10. MARKETS — Let reality select among competing solutions. Law of nature: Evolution advances through variation, selection and retention. Markets allow people to try different products, services and ways of organising resources. People select among them through voluntary choice. Successful solutions attract resources; unsuccessful ones disappear or improve. Markets turn millions of choices into continuous social learning. 11. SPECIALISATION — Let differences become advantages. Law of nature: People differ in knowledge, ability, resources and circumstances. Instead of everyone doing everything badly, specialization lets people become exceptionally good at different things and exchange the results. Cooperation converts human differences from a source of conflict into a source of increasing productivity. 12. SCIENCE — Institutionalise error correction. Law of nature: A false model eventually fails when tested against reality. Science turns doubt into a productive institution: observe, propose, test, criticize, replicate and correct. Knowledge therefore does not have to depend upon authority or tradition. Every generation can discover where the previous generation was wrong and build upon what it got right. 13. CAPITAL — Preserve successful adaptations. Law of nature: Progress compounds only when successful adaptations survive. Tools, businesses, infrastructure, institutions and knowledge allow yesterday’s successful experiments to become tomorrow’s starting point. Each generation does not begin again from zero. It inherits accumulated solutions and adds another layer. 14. EDUCATION — Transfer accumulated knowledge between generations. Law of nature: Individuals die; knowledge does not have to. Writing, schools, apprenticeships and universities allow discoveries to survive their discoverers. Instead of every generation rediscovering mathematics, engineering, medicine and law, it begins with thousands of years of accumulated learning. 15. COMMONS — Build things that make everyone more capable. Law of nature: Cooperation can produce benefits no individual could produce alone. Courts, roads, standards, security, scientific knowledge, infrastructure and trustworthy institutions multiply everyone's ability to act. A successful civilisation does more than protect private interests: it continually creates shared capital that makes future cooperation cheaper and more productive. THE RESULT These principles form a system: Sovereignty creates experimentation. Reciprocity makes it peaceful. Responsibility makes it sustainable. Property makes interests clear. Truth corrects error. Contract creates trust across time. Law suppresses predation. Decentralisation preserves alternatives. Markets select successful solutions. Specialisation multiplies productivity. Science accelerates discovery. Capital preserves what works. Education transmits it. Commons multiply everyone's capabilities. That is the deeper logic of the Western stack: Stable rules + distributed freedom + relentless error correction = cooperation at scale and accelerating innovation."