Tuesday, June 2, 2026

BS, Petty, Cowardly, BS

 "As if helping a little old lady across the street is not the epitome of good or godly. This need to downplay decent, kind, gracious behavior when it's done by humans is, well, not good."

 

 This need to misrepresent or interpret what I say into something negative or nefarious is honestly kind of the opposite of good.   

The simple reality is that the perfection of  YHWH is orders of magnitude beyond helping an old woman across the street.   This is not to say that helping someone is bad, it's merely to point out the vast difference.  

That Dan engages in, and allows others to engage in, this sort of obvious misrepresentation/lire  demonstrates his hypocrisy when he bitches about how others do this to him.  

FYI, as with  pretty much any action motivation matters.  If one is helping an old lady across the street to an ATM so they can steal her money, maybe not the epitome of goodness.  Likewise, helping an old lady across the street to a a dark alley to kill her, not so nice.  

Jesus seemed to think that "Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends." might be a better epitome of good.  But it's not the first time Dan disagrees with Jesus.  

 

 

And even if, at the time, this was not considered rape (because these were misogynistic and patriarchal societies where women were more like property/chattel than free humans), doesn't mean it wasn't rape. Perhaps, back then, virgin girls who had their families killed off by invading nations truly DID think, "Well, at least I get a husband out of this" when they were forcibly wed to the invading conquerors who "chose" them... doesn't mean it's moral or rational or just, in the same way that just because enslaving people was considered normative."

 

Dan seems pretty worked up about this semantic argument about whether Bathsheba was raped or not.   He also seems pretty worked up about "forced marriage" thousands of years ago.   What he doesn't seem particularly worked up about is the fact that girls as young as 9 are forcibly married to middle aged man in the present day.  In 2026 it is legal for a 50 year old man to marry a 9 year old, while Dan bitches about something from thousands of years ago.   Families slaughtered and children raped to defile them in the afterlife, or girls raped before being executed for not obeying their parents (again so they won't go to paradise), not something that gets a lot of attention from Dan.  But he's all in on lecturing YHWH and ancient Israel about how bad they were.  

This Reminds Me A Little Of Rush's Position

 https://x.com/bskimike22802/status/2024576428210331821?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

I am pro-choice.

Before you block me, let me explain.
You know how the left does S-tier redefining of words? They hijack language and steal meanings that belonged to something else entirely, then act offended when you notice. Let me walk through a few examples, because this matters to where I am going.
The rainbow. God placed it in the sky as a covenant with Noah and all of creation, a promise never to destroy the world by flood again. Genesis 9:13 is clear on this. It is one of the oldest symbols of divine promise in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Now? It has been completely hijacked by the LGBT+-!$# movement.
Gender. This was once a grammatical and biological term. A thing measurable, observable, and rooted in reproductive science. Now it has been redefined as a feeling. Like anger. Like hunger. Something that can shift on a Tuesday afternoon and demand that the rest of the world restructure its language, its laws, and its locker rooms to accommodate it. A feeling that, apparently, overrides chromosomes, anatomy, and decades of established medicine.
So I have decided to play the same game. I am reclaiming a term. I am taking "pro-choice" back and using it the way I WANT to use it. Because if they get to redefine rainbow and gender, I get to redefine pro-choice. Fair is fair.

The Part Some People Apparently Need to Be Told

Here is a biological fact that, based on current political discourse, a surprising number of adults seem to have missed in their science education. Or perhaps they are choosing to ignore it for ideological reasons. Either way, I am going to state it plainly.
SEX CAUSES BABIES. Unless you are spending a significant sum of money in a laboratory with a turkey baster and a very patient fertility specialist, the mechanism by which human beings reproduce is biological intercourse. This has been true since before recorded history. It is not a controversial statement. It is not a political position. It is cell biology.
I only feel the need to say this because we are now living in an era where some people assert that men can have babies. So I figure if we are revisiting human reproduction from scratch, we might as well start at chapter one.
Surprising, I know.

What Being Pro-Choice Actually Means

Now. With that established. Here is my position.
I believe the woman should have a choice. And since, as we have just reviewed, sex causes babies... she should absolutely have a choice about whether she wants a baby. That choice is called NOT HAVING SEX.
For most of my followers, this is not going to be a revolutionary concept. The idea that choices have consequences, and that the most effective way to avoid a consequence is to make a different choice before the consequence occurs, is fairly well-established logic. It is actually the foundational premise of most adult decision-making.
You want to be pro-choice? Great. So do I. Choose responsibly. Choose with intention. Choose knowing that another human being may result from that choice. THAT is pro-choice.

Here Is Where I May Lose Some People

I want to be straightforward about this next part, because I think it actually separates me from a lot of people on both sides of this argument. We do not have to agree on everything. I have never demanded agreement as a condition of conversation.
First, a personal note. I asked my wife for exactly ONE thing last Christmas. Not a watch. Not a new anything. A donation to Pre-Born (). That is the organization I believe in when it comes to walking alongside women who are scared and uncertain, providing real support instead of a surgical procedure followed by a parking lot. Just thought you should know where I stand before I continue.
Now. Here is the part that may generate disagreement.
If the woman did NOT get a choice... if she truly, genuinely, did not have any say in what happened to her body... then I believe she should get a choice afterwards. And I think you know what I mean without me having to spell it out.
But it has to be IMMEDIATE. Not a political debate. Not a waiting period designed to make the decision more agonizing. If that is the circumstance, then the decision belongs to her and it should be available to her right away.
I know that is a soul. I am not pretending otherwise. I believe in life at conception. But I also believe in something else, which is that evil exists in this world. Real, terrible evil. And I am not willing to demand that a woman carry the physical evidence of someone else's evil for nine months and then for the rest of her life. That is a small compromise I am willing to make, specifically and only to get to the larger goal, which is eliminating abortion as a form of birth control.
Because THAT is what we are actually talking about the vast majority of the time. Not the hard cases. Not the tragic exceptions. We are talking about a society that has allowed the termination of a human life to become a casual alternative to contraception. We are talking about over 1.4 million procedures per year in the United States, the overwhelming majority of which have nothing to do with rape, incest, or the mother's health.

So Let Me Reclaim the Term

I am pro-choice. I believe women should have full, complete, and meaningful choices about their reproductive futures. Those choices include choosing their partners wisely. Choosing to use contraception, while knowing and accepting that no contraceptive is 100% effective, and that engaging in sexual activity with that knowledge means you have already accepted the residual risk of pregnancy that comes with it. Choosing to wait. Choosing the incredible responsibility of bringing a new human being into the world. And in the most devastating of circumstances, a choice I acknowledge with grief and not celebration.
What I am NOT is pro-casualty. I am not pro-convenience. I am not in favor of a system that has turned the permanent ending of a developing human life into a routine medical procedure with the same moral weight as having a tooth pulled.
The left stole the rainbow. They are busy redefining gender. They have turned "choice" into a one-directional concept that only ever seems to mean one specific thing.
I am taking it back. And I am using it the right way.
You want to be pro-choice? Start by making better ones.
But what do I know. I am only a science teacher who has spent sixteen years explaining to teenagers how human reproduction actually works, and who apparently still needs to explain it to some adults on the internet."

BoT

 https://x.com/wallstreetapes/status/2059756653663392165?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

If people knew what regulation was costing them, I suspect they'd question the value of many  of the regulatory efforts.  

 https://x.com/albuffalo2nite/status/2059615440553349203?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

More reason to despise Momdani's constitutionally questionable taking of private property and giving it away to ONGs.

 https://x.com/katy_faust/status/2059431190671855703?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Happy Pride Month y'all.  Of course, y'all will probably be more upset about the dog.  

  

Context

 https://x.com/timcast/status/2049525959817126143?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 

https://www.axios.com/2025/09/28/left-wing-terrorism-far-right-violence-research?utm_source=chatgpt.com

It is interesting that this dataset seems to exclude the heyday of left wing violence that was the '60s and '70s, it would be interesting to see how this dataset handles the  massive amount of left wing violence and destruction that happened from 2014 to 2021 also.  It's simply noteworthy to see a left leaning outlet actually publishing this.  

 https://x.com/eccentric871/status/2059264013578404248?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 https://cdn.thejournal.ie/media/2025/09/306123-81f9f138-75ab-43cc-aff9-e53e59ac5fdb.pdf

 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9335287/

 https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

 https://x.com/bskimike22802/status/1966220798269460928?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

POLITICAL VIOLENCE: THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE - A COMPREHENSIVE BREAKDOWN OF ATTACKS AGAINST CONSERVATIVES VERSUS LIBERALS (2016-2025) Well, well, well. Another day, another progressive claiming the right is violent while conveniently ignoring the mountains of evidence showing exactly the opposite. Let me provide you with the actual DATA on assassination attempts, threats, and political violence since 2016 - because apparently facts still matter to some of us. ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS: THE SHOCKING DISPARITY ATTEMPTS AGAINST CONSERVATIVES: 6-7 CONFIRMED Donald Trump (2016-2024): At least 5 confirmed assassination attempts by leftist extremists: June 2016: Michael Steven Sandford attempted to grab a police officer's gun at a Trump rally¹ September 2017: Gregory Lee Leingang tried to ram Trump's motorcade with a forklift¹ July 13, 2024: Thomas Matthew Crooks shot Trump at a Pennsylvania rally, injuring Trump and killing bystander Corey Comperatore² September 15, 2024: Ryan Wesley Routh attempted to shoot Trump at his golf club² Additional thwarted plots in 2024 with accomplices arrested Charlie Kirk (2025): Conservative influencer and Trump ally assassinated in September 2025; shooter politically presumed leftist³⁴⁵ Justice Brett Kavanaugh (2022): Nicholas Roske, armed with weapons, arrested near Kavanaugh's residence in attempted assassination after being "upset about the leak of a recent Supreme Court draft decision regarding the right to abortion"⁶ ATTEMPTS AGAINST LIBERALS: ZERO That's right - ZERO confirmed assassination attempts on prominent left-wing figures or Democrats by right-wing attackers with publicly identified perpetrators matching this criteria in this timeframe. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE THREATS: OVERWHELMINGLY FROM THE LEFT The data shows HUNDREDS of threats annually against federal judges, with Supreme Court justices bearing the brunt. The majority of credible threats and physical attacks against Supreme Court justices have come from LEFT-WING EXTREMISTS, particularly following controversial conservative rulings. Notable incidents include: Multiple bomb threats (Justice Amy Coney Barrett's sister received a bomb threat in 2025) Death threats and targeted harassment via social media Attempted physical attacks and stalking at justices' homes involving their families Threats from right-wing against left-leaning justices: Less documented or less frequent in public reports over this timeline. THE CONGRESSIONAL BASEBALL SHOOTING: WHEN POLITICAL HATRED TURNED DEADLY June 14, 2017: James T. Hodgkinson, a 66-year-old Bernie Sanders supporter and Trump-hater, opened fire on Republican congressmen practicing for their annual charity baseball game. This wasn't some spontaneous outburst - this was PREMEDITATED POLITICAL TERRORISM. The Facts: Hodgkinson fired 70 rounds from an SKS rifle and 9mm handgun⁷ He had been "casing" the field since April, taking cellphone video⁸ He approached congressmen the day before asking if Republicans or Democrats were practicing⁹ He had a HIT LIST of six conservative members of Congress¹⁰ He was living out of his van, having traveled to DC specifically to "protest" and target Republicans¹¹ Victims: House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (shot in hip, nearly died) Capitol Police officer Crystal Griner (shot in ankle) Congressional aide Zack Barth Lobbyist Matt Mika Hodgkinson's Political Profile: Bernie Sanders volunteer¹² Posted "Trump is a Traitor. Trump Has Destroyed Our Democracy. It's Time to Destroy Trump & Co."¹³ "Republicans are the Taliban of the USA"¹³ Member of Facebook groups "Terminate The Republican Party" and "The Road to Hell Is Paved With Republicans"¹³ Watched Rachel Maddow, Bill Maher, and "Democracy Now!"¹³ ARSON ATTACKS: THE PATTERN CONTINUES Right-wing conservative targets: 2025 arson at Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's residence by assumed rightist extremist Republican Party HQs targeted (New Mexico GOP HQ in 2025) Left-wing targets: Multiple arson attacks by far-left extremists targeting police precincts, government buildings, and public properties during protest movements (2016-2025) RECENT SURVEY DATA: THE LEFT'S EMBRACE OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE A 2025 Network Contagion Research Institute report found SHOCKING levels of support for political violence among the left: 55% of left-of-center respondents said assassinating President Trump would be "at least somewhat justified" 48% of leftists said the same about assassinating Elon Musk 58% of left-leaning Americans deemed it acceptable to "destroy a Tesla dealership" in protest¹⁴ OTHER NOTABLE ATTACKS ON CONSERVATIVES Family Research Council Shooting (2012): Floyd Lee Corkins II, motivated by the Southern Poverty Law Center's "hate map," shot and wounded a security guard while carrying Chick-fil-A sandwiches he planned to smear on victims' faces¹⁵ Paul Pelosi Attack: While this was indeed an attack on a Democrat's family member, the perpetrator's motivations were mixed and included conspiracy theories from multiple sources. THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA'S CONVENIENT AMNESIA Notice how every time there's political violence from the left, the media either: Ignores it entirely Claims the perpetrator was "mentally ill" (but somehow never applies this standard to right-wing violence) Blames "both sides" for creating a "climate of hate" Memory-holes it within 48 hours Meanwhile, any violence that can be even tangentially linked to conservatives gets 24/7 coverage for weeks. THE BOTTOM LINE The data is crystal clear: from 2016-2025, we've seen 6-7 assassination attempts against conservatives versus ZERO against liberals. We've seen hundreds of threats against conservative Supreme Court justices versus minimal documented threats against liberal justices. We've seen a Bernie Sanders supporter attempt to massacre Republican congressmen while they practiced for a CHARITY baseball game. But sure, keep telling us about how the right is the violent side. The numbers don't lie, even if the narrative does. When progressives talk about "threats to democracy," maybe they should look in the mirror. Because the evidence shows exactly who's been doing the threatening, the shooting, and the attempting to assassinate their political opponents. youtu.be/i5t8wHzpCdI?si #ConservativesUnderAttack #PoliticalViolenceData #AssassinationAttempts #ScaliseStrong #CharliKirkRIP #SupremeCourtThreats #CongressionalBaseball #MediaBias #ViolentLeft #FactsOverNarrative Sources:¹ Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) analysis ² Multiple assassination attempts on Donald Trump, 2024 ³ Charlie Kirk assassination, September 2025 ⁴ CNN analysis of Kirk assassination ⁵ Conservative influencer violence data ⁶ Nicholas Roske Supreme Court threat case ⁷ Congressional baseball shooting investigation report ⁸ Commonwealth's Attorney report on Hodgkinson ⁹ Eyewitness testimony from Congressional baseball shooting ¹⁰ FBI investigation findings ¹¹ Law enforcement interviews with Hodgkinson family ¹² Bernie Sanders campaign ack nowledgment ¹³ CNN analysis of Hodgkinson's social media ¹⁴ Network Contagion Research Institute report, 2025 ¹⁵ Family Research Council shooting case files."

 

 

 Image

 

 https://x.com/basedmikelee/status/2048615292260274583?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 

Tell Me How To Get Far, Far, Away

 https://x.com/megbasham/status/2061519841207501003?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "In the Old Testament, we are told of good kings who “did what was right in the eyes of the Lord,” but who did not tear down the high places. These were places of idolatrous worship. And even though Israel would go back to mostly serving the true God under the leadership of these kings, they were still willing to allow this little bit of culturally destructive compromise to stand. So when the good king died, the mechanism for the gross idolatry was still there, and the idol worship would come roaring back with a vengeance. But the best kings in the Old Testament were those like Hezekiah and Josiah, who completely dismantled these high places. Who tore out every vestige of idolatry root and branch. And that is what needs to be done with this demon god of the rainbow flag. Because we know now the level of depravity to which it inevitably leads. -It represents the buying and selling of human babies for homosexual couples who can never create a child on their own. -It represents dressing little boys up as girls so they can perform sexualized movements for grown men in ritual dances. -It represents cutting off the breasts of healthy young girls, mutilating and defacing their natural beauty. -It represents giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to boys who will never be fathers and who will lose all sexual function. -It represents stocking gay pornography in school libraries for even the tiniest kids and adult men engaging in sexual fetish performances for children. -it represents placing women in danger by requiring the admittance of predatory men to their private, vulnerable spaces. Right now, we learn from scripture, is the moment where good people following the true God will be tempted to think, we’ve had enough victories. Who cares about these June pride posts. The LGBTQ movement has lost so many battles recently, we can rest on our laurels, knowing that we have turned back the tide on the worst excesses of this movement. But that is exactly the opposite of what we need to do. Tearing down high places is hard work. Especially when the high place is manifested as a Supreme Court ruling. But it can be achieved with patience, diligence, and strength of purpose. We have had some significant victories in the last few years. But clearly, we are not done. So let’s grab a virtual ax and refuse to allow them any peace on these demonic celebrations. Like Hezekiah and Josiah, we need to tear it out root and branch."

 https://x.com/sesamestreet/status/2061478578869399798

 

Why in the hell is a publicly funded program (corporate welfare) intended for young children posting this propaganda?

US Journalism Is A Shadow Of What It Used To Be

 https://x.com/sfchronicle/status/2061311862126318014

The open hostility to gay rights in today’s U.S. creates an anxious environment for fans traveling to attend World Cup matches. Pride Houses, such as the one in San Francisco, offer a safe haven."

Let's start with the obvious. The last World Cup was in Quatar, a country where homosexuality is a crime.  Then let's consider that 31% of the countries who are part of FIFW ban or criminalize homosexuality. But the "real journalists" at the SF Chronicle somehow ignored these facts.

Interesting Perspective On "Pride" Month

 https://x.com/bskimike22802/status/2061470420696461642?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "Quick question,

— genuine curiosity here. LGBTQ+ individuals make up roughly 7% of the U.S. population. Veterans make up about 6%. The difference? One group chose a lifestyle. The other signed a blank check to the United States government, payable with their lives. We give Veterans ONE day. November 11. There is only one of those per year — just like there is only one September 13, which, in case you did not know, is National Bald is Beautiful Day. Maybe THAT deserves a full month too. But I digress. An entire MONTH for a group you describe as neither exceptional nor mediocre — just people (your words, not mine, and I agree with them) — while the people who bled, lost limbs, buried friends, and came home broken get twenty-four hours? Seems like the priorities are a little... scrambled. I celebrate everyone's humanity. I do not need a month to do it. But if we are handing out months, I know about 18 million veterans who have been waiting a very long time for that kind of recognition. But what do I know — I am just a bald combat medic who served 23 years, and apparently the calendar has more room for political signaling than for the people who kept this country free."

 

It almost like the ABC folx are proud for merely existing, which seems like an incredibly low bar for "pride". While those who choose to serve in the military have a legitimate reason to feel pride in their service. But, the military gets a couple of days, the ABC folx get a month. Obviously that is completely fair.