https://www.yahoo.com/news/hamas-quietly-drops-thousands-deaths-122557133.html
For all those who've been whining about the casualty rates in Gaza (already far below the threshold in international law to be considered problematic), maybe it's time to consider that Hamas is simply lying to gain your sympathy and support.
https://x.com/africanjewish/status/1907427916725518401?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
BVMLTT.
https://x.com/realmaalouf/status/1907297601717735769?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Because the majority of Muslims want democracy. Or we can listen to what they say about themselves. The UK will probably be a Muslim country within 20 years at this rate, and the Brits are just going to roll over an allow it.
https://x.com/chailife613/status/1907270260413092209?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Again, not wrong.
11 comments:
The first link simply validates what many honest people have long known...the Gazans lie in order to portray themselves as victims and the Israelis as the victimizers. It's a good link for what I'm working on now, and it also speaks to Dan's willful dishonesty and moral relativism regarding the conflict there. Dan's a goat (I know longer call those like him "sheep" of the leftist leadership, because Christ will separate His sheep from the goats and Dan's kind are clearly more goat-like), and will continue to perpetuate the falsehoods about both parties in the conflict.
The rest also betray the lefty narrative as the lie it is. And moreover, it justifies the call to deny immigration to muslims. If they are endangered, it would be safer for us to negotiate refuges in their part of the world where they will already be acclimated, and not further corrupt our society and culture by pretending they are like us or want to be. (We can discuss potential exceptions well after the policy is established)
The very fact that all of the casualty numbers from Gaza have come from one source, Hamas itself, should have been a red flag to all of the idiots who just parroted their numbers. From a media standpoint, going with an unverified single source claim is always a bad choice. Much like Hamas' tactic of using the elderly and children as human shields to gain sympathy from the Dan's of the world, them inflating and twisting their casualty numbers really isn't much of a surprise.
As for the immigration aspect, there are plenty of countries that share a heritage, language, and religion where they should have been assimilated years ago. The fact that none of those countries want them, Egypt build a border wall that put's Trump's to shame just to keep them out, should tell us all we need to know. That Europe has essentially rolled over and played dead on this is a warning we should not ignore.
ROP - Retinopathy of prematurity??
Why not just say what you mean rather than use obscure, unknown acronyms?
Clearly, this is a post dealing with your bigotry against Palestinian peoples and your willingness to support even war crimes on the part of Israel, but, ROP?? Is the P for Palestinians? Revenge of Palestinians?
I have zero ideas or guesses even as to what that means in this context.
This is a strange habit of yours.
But then, you've demonstrated a very problematic understanding of communication (as in, I can say clearly "I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS..." and you can conclude "Dan believes this..." but then, you presumably expect people to know what you personally mean by this unknown acronym.
Strange.
Really Obtuse Peckerwood, or Religion of Peace. I'm sorry that acronyms confuse you so. Strangely, it's just you that's confused.
No, it's one more post extolling the wonders of Islam in all of it's glory.
I understand that you've blinded yourself to the wonders being done in the name of Allah.
I like, "Really Obtuse Peckerwood" if your post is published for Dan's benefit. He can always know you're calling him by name!
"Clearly, this is a post dealing with your bigotry against Palestinian peoples..."
So Dan has a neighbor with three very aggressive dogs named Mahmoud, Ahmed and Puddles. Every time they get out of the control of their owner, they attack one of Dan's kids. But Dan's unwilling to regard the dogs as a clear and present danger because, by golly, that would just be meanie bigotry against those animals and their owner. Dan's a stupid little girl likes the idea of standing up for the "marginalized" without knowing just who those really are.
"...and your willingness to support even war crimes on the part of Israel..."
There are none which have been confirmed. Dan believes a war crime is any action which results in the collateral deaths, because he doesn't give a flying rat's ass how many Israeli citizens are brutally and intentionally killed so long as no Gazan civilians are put out by the righteous and justified retaliation of the IDF, regardless of how they risk their own lives to get around the Gazan human shields to take out the Gazan assholes who are literally doing to Israel what Dan stupidly and without factual basis pretends Israel is doing to the Gazans. Dan's a stupid little girl likes the idea of standing up for the "marginalized" without knowing just who those really are.
"Why not just say what you mean rather than use obscure, unknown acronyms?"
Why not focus on the actual post rather than its title? You're going to say something incredibly stupid and false regardless of whether or not you understand Craig's acronyms.
Posting news about Muslims, and what's happening in Gaza is not in any way bigotry.
The only undisputed war crimes in Gaza are the hostages taken and held by Hamas, the use of the elderly and children as human shields, and the rape of their victims and hostages. But Dan ignores those, in favor of imaginary war crimes by Israel. That the IDF has conducted a campaign of urban warfare, against and enemy using the elderly and children as human shields, while keeping civilian casualties well below the threshold in international law is impressive, not criminal.
That Dan has nothing but bitching about my post titles tells us so very much about him and his inability to deal with the reality of Hamas specifically and Islam generally.
That's because Dan's a stupid little girl who has no idea or clue about the conflict, or an abject Jew-hating defender of some of the worst people in the world who he falsely labels "the marginalized". There's no third possibility.
---Art
I don't think Dan has the courage to actually hate anyone, he seems too interested in validation to actually take that firm of a stand.
I'm convinced that he is just willfully ignorant on the conflict and the history, because he's been told that there is an approved narrative that he must believe and so he just parrots what he's been told to parrot.
He is all about posturing as "Christian", isn't he? But he chose to side with the bad guys for whatever reason, and just as he does for every other bad guys he defends, he's now compelled to disparage the good who oppose those bad guys he champions.
I am noticing a trend of Dan siding with, defending, excusing, of justifying, the actions of those most would consider to be "bad guys".
Although the likelihood he'll say anything is tiny, I suspect that if he does, he'll be supporting Karmelo Anthony, and blaming Austin Metcalf.
For all of Dan's posturing about the horrors of raping children, he ignores a post about a child rapist walking free early from prison, to make idiotic off topic comments on other posts. But, again, he's been pretty soft on those who kidnap and rape recently.
Post a Comment