BoT

https://x.com/nldrmedia/status/1998861580407288256?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw 

Great example of how awesome some of these Somali immigrants are.  

 https://x.com/nldrmedia/status/1998861580407288256?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Woopsie, I guess following the science doesn't help the greens extremists.

 "NATURE JOURNAL RETRACTS MAJOR CLIMATE STUDY THAT CLAIMED $38 TRILLION IN ANNUAL DAMAGE BY 2049 The "science" strikes again. Nature has retracted a highly publicized 2024 climate study from Germany's Potsdam Institute that projected climate change would cause $38 trillion in economic damage annually by 2049 and a 62% reduction in global GDP by 2100. Progressives hyped it relentlessly. Axios called it a study that "shines a new light on the patterns and severity of climate change's economic impacts." It was used to justify electric vehicle mandates and other costly government interventions. One problem: the study was garbage. Scientists found rows of data were "wrongly printed as a decimal, rather than a percentage point." When corrected for statistical uncertainty, the results became "statistically insignificant." And here's the kicker: the entire projection was driven by data anomalies from one country, Uzbekistan, where economic data from 1995-1999 was inaccurate. Remove Uzbekistan, fix the math errors, and suddenly the economic harm from climate change is no longer distinguishable from the costs of doing nothing. The Network for Greening the Financial System, a group of central banks including the Federal Reserve, had already incorporated this junk study into their climate stress tests. The Fed withdrew from that network in January. Why didn't peer reviewers catch obvious errors? Conformity bias. Nobody wanted to question findings that supported the narrative. This is why Americans don't trust climate "science." Source: Wall Street Journal / Nature"

 

 https://x.com/alphanews/status/1998860940196892830?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw 

The more you know.