Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Econ 101

 https://x.com/bskimike22802/status/2094424419795923090?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

AND THE ONLY WAY THEY STAY IN BUSINESS IS BY MAKING SOCIETY GLAD IT PAID

A few years back, one of my juniors in study hall raised her hand during a unit on supply and demand and asked me, dead serious, why the owner of the corner store "gets to" charge more for milk than the big grocery chain does. Not a bad question. Actually a great one. I told her the truth, which is that he is not robbing her, he is charging her for the privilege of not driving fifteen minutes to save forty cents. She sat with that for a second and said, "Okay, that's actually fair." One sentence. Took her about four seconds to understand something that apparently escapes several sitting United States senators.
So let's try this with the grown-ups, since the sixteen-year-olds seem to be picking it up faster.
Here is the sentence that is going to make somebody's blood pressure spike before they even finish their coffee: every business owner in this country, every single one, regardless of what he sells, is in business to enrich himself off the cost of his customers. Full stop, no asterisk.
I can already hear the gasping. Let it out. Get it all the way out. Feel better? Good, because now we are going to talk about why that sentence, the one that just made you clutch your pearls, is actually the reason you have shoes on your feet and a phone in your pocket that can summon a pizza in forty minutes.

— OKAY, BUT WHY ISN'T THAT JUST GREED —

Because greed, left alone in the wild with no leash on it, gets eaten by its own customers. That's why.
Picture it. You own a hardware store. You want to get as rich as humanly possible, as fast as possible, morally unencumbered by anything. Great. Overcharge everyone. Sell them a busted drill and shrug. Congratulations, you just wrote yourself a one-star review, and in this economy that review has a longer shelf life than the drill did. Your neighbor down the road, the one who actually stands behind his tools, just inherited your entire customer base for free, and he did not even have to advertise. Your greed built HIS business for him. That is not a metaphor. That is Tuesday in America.
I want you to notice something about that mechanism. Nobody had to regulate it. Nobody had to hold a press conference. The customer simply walked, with her feet, toward the guy who did not treat her like an ATM with legs. That is the whole system, working exactly as designed, and it did it without a single congressional subcommittee getting involved.
A business owner who wants your money for the next thirty years, not just this Tuesday, has precisely one option available to him: make you glad you handed it over. That is not altruism. I do not need him to love me. I need him to need my repeat business badly enough that he treats me like I matter. Turns out that produces the exact same result as if he actually cared, which, if we are being honest with each other, is kind of beautiful in its own petty little way.

— MY BROTHER-IN-LAW'S LAWN COMPANY, OR: WHAT NOBODY TELLS YOU ABOUT SIXTY-HOUR WEEKS —

I have watched actual small business owners up close, not the cartoon villain from a stump speech, the real thing, the guy running a landscaping crew with a truck that has seen better decades.
Ask him why he is out the door before six most mornings. He is not chasing a yacht. He is chasing Thursday's payroll, which comes due whether the month was good or whether three mowers broke down and a client canceled. If the math does not work, he does not eat, his guys do not eat, and neither do their kids. That is not corporate villainy. That is the oldest math there is, the same math that has been running since somebody first decided to trade a fish for a basket instead of just fighting over the fish.
He pays his best mower operator a little more than he probably has to, and you know why? Because losing that guy to the competitor down the street costs him more than the raise does. Nobody taught him that in a seminar. He learned it the way every small business owner learns everything, which is by almost losing everything and adjusting.

— A REVOLUTIONARY IDEA ABOUT PAYCHECKS, BRACE YOURSELF —

Here is a wild concept nobody seems to be teaching anymore: a wage is something two people agree to. On purpose. Voluntarily. Like adults.
An employer offers a number. You take it or you do not. If nobody takes it, the number goes up, because an empty schedule does not fill orders and empty orders do not pay rent. That is not exploitation. That is arithmetic wearing a work vest.
Now, about that rich CEO everybody loves to hate at the family cookout. What exactly is HE doing with all that money you think he is hoarding in a Scrooge McDuck vault? Building the facility. Buying the equipment. Making payroll on the fifteenth whether the quarter was great or a dumpster fire. Betting his own capital that this thing works, and if it does not, HE is the one who loses the house, not the guy on the floor who updates a resume by Friday and has a new job by spring. That is not a small asymmetry. That is the entire reason risk-takers occasionally get rich and everybody else gets a steady paycheck instead of a stomach ulcer.

— THE LADDER THEY BUILT WHILE EVERYONE SCREAMED ABOUT THE RUNGS —

McDonald's pays well above minimum wage and has known for decades exactly what that crew job is. It is not supposed to raise a family of four. It is supposed to be the first line on a sixteen-year-old's resume, the one that turns into shift lead, then assistant manager, then a general manager clearing six figures with zero student debt attached to his name.
Walmart runs the same ladder. A store manager can out-earn somebody with a master's degree and a loan payment the size of a car note. No lecture hall required. Just showed up, worked hard, climbed.
Somebody had to build that ladder. It did not fall from the sky. A business owner built it, chasing a profit, and every kid who ever climbed it did so on a structure some "greedy" capitalist put up with his own money, expecting nothing from that kid except that he show up and put in the work.

— THE TIME CONGRESS TAXED A YACHT AND UNEMPLOYED THE GUY WHO BUILT IT —

I love this story because it is not a hypothetical. It actually happened, and the results are sitting in the historical record for anybody bored enough to go check.
Back in 1990, Congress slapped a luxury tax on yachts, private planes, and fancy jewelry. The idea, as always, was to stick it to the rich. Very satisfying. Very good campaign ad.
Here is what actually happened. The yacht industry in America basically collapsed. About twelve thousand people lost their jobs. Not the yacht owners, mind you, they simply had their boats built overseas instead, because the tax did not make them want a yacht less, it just made them shop somewhere else for one. The people who lost their jobs were welders. Riggers. Upholsterers. Marine electricians. Regular guys with tool belts, not the millionaires the tax was aimed at.
Congress repealed it two years later. Took the domestic industry most of a decade to crawl back.
That, my friends, is Quinn's First Law of Liberalism happening in real time, on the record, with receipts: liberalism generates the exact opposite of what it promises. They wanted to punish the wealthy. They fired the working class instead, because a rich man's spending IS somebody else's paycheck, whether anyone in Washington bothered to notice or not.

— THE GUYS THEY DEMONIZED WHILE THEY WERE BUSY BUILDING YOUR WHOLE WORLD —

While the professional finger-waggers of every era have made a nice living campaigning against "the rich," it is worth actually looking at what those rich men were doing with the fortune everybody assumed they were hoarding in a mattress somewhere.
Henry Ford doubled his own workers' pay to five dollars a day in 1914, more than double the going rate, and cut the workday down an hour, back when he was replacing his entire workforce three and a half times a year just to keep the line staffed. Everybody called him crazy. Turnover vanished. He said, plain as day, that if he paid his workers enough to actually buy the cars they were building, he had just made his own customers. He basically invented the American middle class by accident. Congress showed up twenty-four years later, mandated a quarter an hour, and took a victory lap.
Milton Hershey was seventy-two when the Depression hit, and instead of doing what every accountant on earth would have told him to do, he built a hotel. An arena. A school for orphaned boys that is STILL running today. He said, more or less, that he would have to feed the men either way, so he might as well get a swimming pool out of it. I have read a lot of economics in my life. That sentence beats most of it.
Julius Rosenwald partnered with Booker T. Washington and built over five thousand schools for Black children across the segregated South, in counties where the government had simply decided not to bother. Andrew Carnegie spent the last two decades of his life giving away his entire steel fortune, funding over two thousand public libraries, not in the rich neighborhoods that already had them, in the mill towns, for the kids of miners who had never owned a book in their lives.
Not one of those men needed a subcommittee hearing. Not one needed an appropriations bill. They were, at the time, being publicly demonized as robber barons. And they were quietly building the actual infrastructure of American opportunity with their own money while the politicians of their era gave speeches about them.
If anybody can hand me a "tax the rich" government program with a comparable body of work, I am all ears. I have been waiting a long time for that list to show up.

— TAX THE RICH, SAID THE RICH, FROM THE PRIVATE JET —

I keep watching the same show on repeat and I keep having the same reaction.
A politician worth eight figures, standing in a suit that costs more than my mortgage payment, tells me the wealthy need to pay their fair share. A senator charters a private jet at fifteen thousand dollars an hour to go denounce billionaires, and when a reporter has the nerve to ask about it, the answer is basically "I am not standing in line at the airport like you people." Every last one of them files a return prepared by an accountant who knows every loophole their own party wrote into the tax code, on purpose, for people exactly like them.
So here is my offer. It never expires, and I make it every single time this comes up. Before I take one more lecture about what the wealthy owe society, lead by example. Cut a check to the IRS for double what you legally owe. Standard deduction only, no fancy accountant, no trust, no ranch conveniently classified as a conservation easement. Do that three years running, publish it, and then we can talk.
They will not. They never will. Some hogs have all four feet in the trough at the same time, and no amount of "fair share" campaign material changes which end of the pig is doing the talking.

— FOLLOW THE MONEY ALL THE WAY THROUGH, NOT JUST TO THE PART THAT MAKES YOU MAD —

A business owner chasing profit has to keep you happy or he loses you, we covered that. Keep going. Happy customers come back. They bring a friend. That friend becomes a customer. Growing revenue means hiring. New hires bring home a paycheck that buys groceries and gas and school shoes, and that money keeps moving, into the diner, the mechanic, the guy mowing lawns at six in the morning.
That is not some trickle-down fairy tale somebody invented to sell you a tax cut. That is just how money physically moves through a town, whether the people involved ever sat through a single economics lecture or not.
And the business owner who does not care whether you are happy? He fails. That is not cruelty, that is the market's blunt little way of saying "somebody else will treat these people better, so go home." Look at your own life. Televisions, computers, clothes, all of it has gotten cheaper for decades. Meanwhile the stuff the government subsidizes hardest, college, healthcare, childcare, keeps getting MORE expensive every single year. That is not a coincidence, and if a fifteen-year-old in my third period can spot the pattern, I promise you can too.

— IF THEY ACTUALLY RAN IT INSTEAD —

For anyone about to type "well then let the government just do it instead," I would like a real quick look at the government's current résumé before we hand it anything else.
The VA has been "getting fixed" for as long as I have been alive, and I am a medically retired combat medic, so I have a personal stake in that one. cost a small fortune and crashed the day it launched. The Pentagon has failed seven straight audits and cannot even tell you where all of its own stuff is. And somehow, this same government finds nearly a trillion dollars a year for defense without blinking, but cannot find roughly nine hundred seventy-five million dollars a year to stop stealing retirement pay from about fifty-four thousand combat-wounded veterans who got medically forced out before hitting twenty years. That bill has a name. It is the Major Richard Star Act. There is a discharge petition sitting right now, H.Res. 1247, that exists purely because leadership refuses to give it an honest vote.
So forgive me if I trust the guy who has to earn my business every single visit a little more than I trust the agency that cannot pass its own audit and still wants a bigger budget next year.

— HERE IS THE ACTUAL POINT —

Every business owner in America enriches himself off the cost of his customers. I meant it in the first line and I mean it now. That is not the scandal the professional outrage industry needs it to be. That is the load-bearing wall of the only economic system in human history that has ever lifted this many people out of poverty without piling up a body count to do it.
He needs you happy to stay rich. The second he stops needing that, he either turned into a monopolist protected by regulations his own critics demanded, or he became a government bureaucrat, and bureaucrats do not go out of business for making your life miserable. They just circle back next year and ask for more of your money to keep doing it.
Pick your dependency wisely. You only get one economy to live in."

This Doesn't Sound Too Crazy

 https://x.com/myhandleno/status/2094666979999150314?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Just to clear the air: I’m a MAGA conservative, but that doesn’t mean what a lot of you apparently think it does. Let’s break it down, because I’m tired of being told what I believe and what I stand for. Spoiler: not every conservative is the same, but most of us I know share these same principles. 1. I believe America should never depend on another country for energy, protection, or basic supply and demand. We are strongest when we build, produce, and protect things right here in the USA. 2. I believe America must put itself first. We cannot pour from an empty cup. Our country should prioritize our own people before trying to save the world. 3. I believe only legal citizens have the right to vote. You must have a valid ID to vote. I also believe in a secure election process. 4. I believe no foreign aid should be given until every veteran at home is taken care of. 5. I believe immigrants make America stronger — when they come legally. If your first act in this country is breaking the law, you aren’t an upstanding citizen. 6. You can marry who you want. I may not agree with your lifestyle, but your life is not mine to judge, I leave that to God Almighty. That being said, I am a Christian and suggest everyone read and follow God's word. 7. I believe men are men and women are women. Surgery or hormone don’t change that. Men should use men’s bathrooms, and women should use women’s bathrooms. 8. I believe schools are for education, not indoctrination. Kids should learn math, history, reading, and science - not political propaganda. They should not be taught they were “born in the wrong body” or pushed into gender delusion. 9. I believe America is in a mental health crisis. Mental health care is real, it matters, and it desperately needs to be addressed. 10. I believe guns aren’t the problem - people are. Gun control only infringes on constitutional rights. But I also believe in common sense: background checks are necessary to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill. I’m a conservative because I believe in faith, family, freedom, and personal responsibility. I don’t want a government that controls every aspect of our lives - I want a government that protects our rights, secures our borders, defends our freedoms, and then gets out of the way. We are strongest when Americans take care of America first, when families are supported, when our veterans are honored, and when our children are given truth, not propaganda. I love this country, and I believe it’s worth fighting for."

Freedom?

 https://x.com/krisztinamaria/status/2094766989268947334?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "The niqab is feminism and freedom, they say. It comes back every single time. A Muslim voice steps into the debate and explains to us that the niqab and the headscarf are the woman's own choice. That she decides over her own body. That it is in fact feminism. And that the rest of us should stay well away from the subject, because we do not understand it. Usually it is a man saying it. So let us take it from the ground up. Not because the argument is strong, but because it has been repeated so many times that people have started to believe it. Freedom is not measured by what a person is allowed to do. Freedom is measured by what it costs to do the opposite. A choice is only free if both doors are open. One door leads to support from family, mosque and the entire community. The other leads to condemnation, loss of honour, loss of network and in some cases loss of safety. Then there are not two doors. There is one door and a warning. If you want to test it, it takes three seconds. Same woman. Same right to decide over her own body. She says: tomorrow I take the niqab off. I let my hair blow free. I wear a summer dress with bare arms and bare legs. Now ask the same men who defended her choice yesterday whether they defend it today. They do not. You know it. I know it. They know it themselves. And they do not even hide it. Go into any comment thread where this exact subject is being discussed. Not some other topic. This one. Covering, choice, freedom. And watch what happens the moment Western women are brought up. We are the contrast they need. We are called whores. Cheap. Without dignity. Women who have used their so-called freedom to make themselves available to anyone. That is written by the same men who, three comments earlier, explained that a woman decides over her own body. Read what is actually happening there. Her right to cover is being defended by degrading the women who do not. Both statements come from the same man, in the same thread, about the same question. If both choices were genuinely equal, one of them would not have to be dragged through the mud to defend the other. And while they write it, they stare. Every woman reading this has noticed. That is where the whole argument collapses. The right to choose is defended in one direction only. A right that runs one way is not a right. It is an order with a friendly explanation on the outside. Then comes the next move. She says herself that she chooses it. Who are you to contradict her? Think about what is actually being asked. If there is a price for taking the covering off, there is also a price for saying you were pressured into putting it on. The punishment lands on both statements. Her answer is therefore least reliable in exactly the situation where it is being used as final proof. You cannot elevate one answer to the status of truth while pretending it is a coincidence that only that answer is free to give. And there is something that runs deeper than what she dares say out loud. She was born into an ideology that places her sex beneath the man's from the very beginning. She was raised to believe that covering is what is best for her. That it protects her. That it is the very source of her dignity. She has heard it since before she could walk. I am not saying she is stupid. I am not saying she has no will of her own. I am saying that no human being can give free consent to something they have never seen a real alternative to. That applies to all of us. None of us chooses freely inside what we were taught to see as the condition of our own worth. And there is the truly uncomfortable part. When covering is tied to her dignity, the opposite choice is not merely forbidden. It is shameful. Nobody chooses freely between two options when one of them is defined as the loss of herself. '

History Sucks

 

 

 "Slavery is a word well understood, but in the minds of most people, it is associated with the black slave trade from Africa to America across the Atlantic. Many people are not aware that a parallel form of slavery existed in the kidnapping of white men and women by North Africans and Arabs. The purpose of these captures was slavery. Another aspect of this slavery was white women (preferably virgins) to populate the harems of the Arab Sheikhs and Beys. The Arabs and the Moors were the foremost exponents of this trade as they had a penchant for fair and golden-haired white girls. This trade lasted much longer than the black slave trade and overshot it by hundreds of years. The black trade was stopped by an act of legislation. This did not happen in the case of the white slave trade which ended only after the Arabs and Moors were militarily crushed by the European powers. The onset of white slave trade began when the Muslim arms conquered almost the entire North Africa and Spain. It was at its zenith when the Mediterranean Sea almost became a Muslim controlled lake with the Ottoman Empire at its zenith. Even after the defeat of the Muslims, the slave trade was taken over by Muslim pirates called the Corsairs. The Corsairs were a daredevil lot and scoured the entire Mediterranean Sea. They also raided the coastal villages of Europe and kidnapped white girls. These girls have spirited away to the harems of the Arabs and sold at auctions where they earned a high price for the kidnapper. https://x.com/archeohistories/status/2094659483108860189?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 White men were also kidnapped for ransom and to work as slaves. There are reports that King Richard the lion heart was also kidnapped and released when a large ransom was paid for him. As far as the kidnapping of girls from the European coastal villages is concerned, the effect was one of fear and many villages shifted deeper away from the coast, to escape from the marauding Muslim pirates. Later the Muslim pirates started a preference for Slav girls who were fair and had golden hair. Raiding parties roamed the Baltic and the Aegean Sea for these girls. The magnitude of the slavery can only be estimated as no exact figures are available. Generally, it is estimated that the figure would be over a million. The Corsairs were the main exponents of this white slave trade and they also extracted a levy from the ships that sailed the Mediterranean Sea. In the period after 1609 in a span of a decade, almost 400 British ships were captured and the men made slaves and released only after a ransom was paid. Other who could not pay languished in Arab farms as workers and slaves till death. Later Britain paid a tribute and their ships were spared. But nations and settlements close to the sea in SE Europe and the Slav areas bore the brunt of this slavery. A fact that has now emerged is the massive kidnapping and abduction of white girls as slaves for the harems of the Arabs. This menace lasted for hundreds of years and it continued until the 19th century. In 1814 the European powers signed a convention to outlaw the attacks of the Berbers and the Ottoman Turks. The Christian nations now asserted and the rising White power inflicted heavy defeats on the Corsairs and the Turks. This rising European power led to the demise of the white slave trade. A point worth noting is that the slave trade in white women only stopped after the defeat of the Turks and Muslims and not by any act or edict. 📷 : 1857 oil painting The Slave Dealer by Australian-born British artist Robert Dowling, depicting an interior slave market scene in the Middle East."

Food For Thought

 https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Exa81XukW/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Tuesday, September 1, 2026

State Fair

 Went to the fair yesterday and made it out unbothered by Somali gangs.   I also came up with the solution to the Somali gang problem at the fair.   In the off season, rearrange the fairgrounds so that every entrance funnels everyone through a line of swine pens.   Or, make everyone eat the bacon on a stick as a condition of admission.

Problems solved.   You’re welcome.  

BVMLTT

 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dct1Y5lzGdY/?igsi=MTc5aDhvMjJlbjd1MQ==