Warning, Harsh Language Plus Some Truth

 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTWYjRnjZq4/?igsh=emxjZmk1M216Y2wy

Before you click on the link, be sure you have some tolerance for some harsh language.   

With that out of the way, this guy nails it.    

Witnesses

 https://x.com/rabbriansamuel/status/2021272893133385807?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 

 "When Yeshua said, "He who is without sin cast the first stone", He wasn't saying, "Hey, you all are sinners too, so don't judge." He was using Torah to set the adulteress free. "Casting the first stone" is Torah-based. According to Torah, adultery is punishable by death. But who is the one who executes that punishment? Not the police, not the court, not the mob. It is the witness to the crime that casts the first stone. "The hand of the witnesses shall be first against him to put him to death…" (Deuteronomy 17:6–7) Why does Torah state that the witnesses cast the first stone? Because if the witnesses must initiate the execution, a false witness is not merely lying, he is shedding innocent blood and becomes guilty of death himself. So when Yeshua said, "He who is without sin, cast the first stone", He was effectively saying, "Where are the witnesses to her crime? If you are a witness, go ahead and stone her! But remember, if you are lying, you are next!" When the crowd walked away, it wasn’t because they suddenly recognized their own sinfulness. They walked away because they did not witness her crime, so they could not cast the first stone according to the Law. As well, the Law prescribes that there cannot only be one witness. There must be two or more witnesses. "A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses." (Deuteronomy 19:15) Yeshua asked her, "Where are your accusers?" and she said that there are none. Without witnesses, according to Law, Yeshua could not pronounce her guilty. Therefore, He said what is prescribed under the Law: "Neither do I condemn you." He then used the opportunity to set her free. "Go and sin no more.""

 

 We don't often hear a genuinely new take on scriptural interpretation (maybe this isn't new and I'd missed it) , and I'd like to dig a little more into this before I run with it, but on first read it certainly makes sense. Perhaps Jesus was writing the relevant sections of The Law in the dirt. It's been established elsewhere that part of the problem with this testing of Jesus was the fact that the man wasn't brought before Him as well as The Law doesn't give the guy a pass on adultery. However, this notion that there were not the required two (or more) witnesses makes a lot of sense. At this point, take this with a grain of salt, but it does seem like something worthy of further study, especially as it relates to Jesus relationship with The Law.

 

Misleading? Propoganda?

 

 

 

 I've seen this misleading graphic in several places and have three issues about how it is presented.  

1.  There have been more deportations from TX than any other state, yet the map doesn't seem to indicate that.

2.  The darker areas are literally the "sanctuary"  jurisdictions which are refusing to cooperate with ICE as has been done for decades.  Is it shocking that those areas would have more ICE activity based on the fact that ICE gets no cooperation?    It sounds like it takes two ICE agents to take custody of someone in a jail, as opposed to 16 when they need to find them in the wild.   Shocking. 

 3.  It clearly shows the decrease in activity at the border.  

 

 

 

The Injustice System

 https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/2020989144839721059

 https://www.wave3.com/2026/02/09/he-fell-through-cracks-jefferson-co-judge-cuts-jurys-sex-assault-sentence-recommendation-half/

This clip seems to be from a local news broadcast from  WAVE TV in Louisville where we see a black judge cutting the sentence of a black gentleman who robbed, kidnapped, sexually abused, and sodomized and women he'd never met.   The reason given by the judge for this generous reduction of his sentence was essentially that he was black.  What exactly in KY law allows this sort of thing?  

I could be wrong, but basing decisions based on someones race or ethnicity seems like racism to me.   

I also could be wrong, but is anyone concerned about the message that this sends to the victim?  

Sounds like something worthy of a protest.  Given the statistics, the likelihood that at least one other woman will suffer a similar fate seems high.   If that happens during the period of the original sentence, the judge needs to be held accountable.  It also sounds like he had a long history of crime.  

This sounds like the excuse we often hear for immigrants who rape and kidnap.  He "didn't know it was wrong.".   

 https://x.com/memeticsisyphus/status/2021205665914519614?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 

Open Your Mouth And Remove All Doubt

 https://x.com/ilhanmn/status/2021372148896682175?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 https://www.pila.ie/resources/bulletin/2024/04/10/somalian-constitutional-change-lowers-the-age-of-maturity-leaving-children-potentially-vulnerable

So, Ilhan accuses Trump of protecting pedophiles, when we now know that Trump actually turned Epstein in, yet the "age of consent" in Somalia is 15, and 45% of Somali girls are married before age 18.  

" https://www.pila.ie/resources/bulletin/2024/04/10/somalian-constitutional-change-lowers-the-age-of-maturity-leaving-children-potentially-vulnerable"

I cannot find any actual information about specific punishments for pedophiles in Somalia, but given how other Muslim countries treat pedophiles, I suspect that they are not harshly punished.  

Strangely enough, The UK actually does protect large numbers of pedophiles, and Omar doesn't seem bothered by that at all.  

Thanks to the ASPL, "pedophile" is quickly becoming one of the terms that means everything and nothing at the same time.  Much like "racist", any of the "phobe" terms, and "fascist" the term is so overused as to rob it of any significant meaning.   Also, the push from academia to rebrand pedophilia to MAP and to normalize it as simply one more "Sexual orientation" also removes much of the effectiveness from this attack.  

Finally, much like body cams, the Epstein files haven't proven to be the gold mine of anti Trump material that the ASPL hoped.    

The MSM Has Problems

 

 

 What the headlines don't tell you is that this fine, upstanding, gentleman was in possession of 50 pounds of meth.   

 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyk917xy8no

So the BBC writes an article about a tragic event, and the headline is incredibly misleading to say the least.  It is technically factual, but it leads to a certain conclusion that may not be warranted by the facts. 

 https://x.com/geraldposner/status/2021580884785176898?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

The tragedy in Canada yesterday has some interesting media aspects.  

1.  The MSM reported the killer as a "woman in a dress", instead if accurately reporting the facts.  

2.  They refused to use the term "gunman".  

3.  One more "trans" mass shooter for the ASPL to ignore.   

 https://x.com/mrandyngo/status/2021349366527922361?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

And ABC seemingly misrepresents a story to benefit a fleeing illegal alien.    Andy Ngo is a pretty well known independent journalist who’s done extensive reporting on ANTIFA and the carnage in Seattle.   

https://x.com/leighwolf/status/2020922374150029421?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 There has been a lot of back and forth here about the MSM and sources.  Well CBS, the "revered" TV network wrote an article claiming that less than 14% of illegal aliens arrested have records of "violent crimes".  Yet the graph (below) clearly shows that the majority of illegal aliens have serious crimes (if not violent), and ignore the fact that every illegal alien has committed at least one crime in crossing the border, and that the due process for that crime is deportation.  

 Here's a few crimes categorized as "non-violent": Drug trafficking, human smuggling, child porn, fraud, DUI, burglary, etc.

 

So, yeah we should absolutely only trust the MSM for accurate information.   Because CBS doesn't seem to think that the above are worthy of arrest or deportation.  

Damn, The BV Are Bringing Fire. Don't Forget BVMLTT!

 https://x.com/periklesgreat/status/2020934957330465223?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 https://x.com/wil_da_beast630/status/2020902021457424744?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 https://x.com/wil_da_beast630/status/2020284102499308016?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw