Wednesday, February 7, 2018
Remember all those people who kept telling us that black lives matter?
I guess they don’t matter as much as the chance to give immigrants who’ve come to this country in violation of US immigration law a free pass. Hell, Kapernick is even strangely silent when a fellow black NFL player is killed. Now, I realize that this poor immigrant was simply exercising his liberty when engaging in the actions that killed two people. I also understand that despite his multiple deportations he really wasn’t a criminal. Of course I also realize that he’s going to be supported with taxpayer dollars for the foreseeable future, simply for trying to express his liberty and gain a better life.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
One of the arguments we here from the open borders crowd is how immigrants (legal or illegal depending upon the source being cited) are no more likely to commit a crime than are citizens, with some people saying they do so less often than citizens. Let's assume it is true for the sake of argument. Regulating who comes in still reduces the number of people engaging in criminal activity, causing auto accidents and draining resources. The point here is why then should we be allowing in more people who will add to those totals? Surely if we were to actually halt all immigration of any kind all those numbers would improve, and thus they would improve by regulating who and how many get to enter at all.
When we the people, in order to form a more perfect union, ordained and established the U.S. Constitution, it was to provide for the general welfare of U.S. citizens...not the citizens of the world. It is the prime directive of our government to provide for OUR welfare, to protect US.
IMO, i don't think it's an issue, in the sense that we should always exclude those known to be criminals, gang members, or drug dealers from entering the country. I realize that it impinges on their liberty to go where they will and to engage in whatever commerce strikes their fancy, but this seems to be a reasonable requirement. Clearly, those who champion unfettered liberty will not agree.
Post a Comment