https://x.com/i/status/2002767292782760347
https://x.com/laralogan/status/1999926620103254425?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/charliek_news/status/1999483215417922003?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
More fraud fun
https://x.com/wallstreetapes/status/2002033335510741371?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Our very own human feces map.
https://x.com/govtstheproblem/status/1999536820296511624?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
More DFL leaders advocating for more criminals running free.
https://x.com/gunthereagleman/status/2000976782925693125?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/lancegooden/status/1999546593230442725?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/ianonpatriot/status/1999198852717424957?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
What could possibly have changed?
https://x.com/wallstreetapes/status/1999553320311026066?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
This whole narrative that the Epstein files was going to sink Trump looks stupider and stupider every day.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1999256337419555044?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
The whole BLM movement was a massive fraud which did nothing except enrich a few black women.
https://x.com/johnkonrad/status/1999121027675099213?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
I might have posted this, but am not sure. But more legal justification for Trump's actions around Venezuela.
https://x.com/radiogenoa/status/2000119306403664092?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/lauraloomer/status/2000206483913400742?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/realmaalouf/status/1999997819009286539?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/repfine/status/1999844546818232440?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/rubinreport/status/1999504803706097843?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/realmaalouf/status/1999496902266478881?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/trobinsonnewera/status/1999278085003444335?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
The very simple reality is that the policies supported by the politicians that people just like (and including) Dan are to blame for all of the above. The rapes, the attacks, the shootings, the kidnappings, the mass killings, the attempts to impose Sharia, that have been visited upon Western countries should be laid squarely at the feet of Dan and his fellow progressives. They advocated for unlimited immigration, a revolving door judicial, and supported those who pushed it through. Now we have billions in fraud, attempts to have actual insurrections, and crimes going (mostly) unpunished. If you supported Biden's immigration policies, this is on you.
28 comments:
It's not so much that I supported Biden's immigration policies (I didn't). It's that I support Jesus' welcoming approach to immigrants and agree with Jesus' condemnation of those who turn away immigrants, refugees and the needy.
And if you reject Jesus' teachings, well, that's on you.
If you want to blame JESUS for rapes and murders and unicorn kidnappings, go for it. See where that gets you.
If you want to actually demonstrate you are opposed to sexual predators, START with your overtly deviant president. That you are fine with VOTING for that monster shows that you're not really concerned about rape. That you are fine with it when you interpret the Bible as saying God allowed Israelites to kidnap foreign girls and make them their "wives" (ie, rape them), shows you are not really concerned with the oppression of women. Hell, you think God endorses it!
You all can't be taken seriously on matters of morality. You've thrown your credibility away to vote for a pervert felon. That is on you all.
Given your full throated support of Biden, and your complete lack of complaint about Biden's border policies, this seems like one more of you modifying your position after the fact. But if you can show me an instance where you specifically criticized Biden's immigration policy at the time, please do.
I'm not blaming Jesus for the actions of individuals, I'm blaming people like you who supported Biden and his immigration policies, and continue to advocate for more immigrants, with no interest in whether those immigrants will assimilate or abide by US law.
You just can't condemn specific, actual rapists for their actions (when they're immigrants or leftists), without trying to bring Trump into the conversation. I'd ask for an example of Trump being charged or convicted of rape, but there isn't one and you'd throw up some bullshit smokescreen to obfuscate that fact.
I do, as always, appreciate your creativity in making straw men to argue against and in making shit up and pretending as if it represents anything I've actually said or believe.
Coning from someone who continually makes excuses to avoid condemning specific instances of rape (thousands of them) because it interferes with your narrative on immigration and Islam, this is absolutely hilarious. That you've chosen to go all in on the pot narrative, after placing your "credibility" in the hands of liberals and Muslims, is even more hilarious.
I needed a good laugh, and you provided it.
I'll simply note that you chose not to interact with any of the specifics I posted on but chose to make these bullshit, straw men, ad hom attacks.
Billions of dollars in fraud from Somali immigrants, along with kidnappings and rapes, and Dan can't bring himself to condemn those specific actions nor to acknowledge that his unlimited, unverified, immigration position has anything to do with this current predicament. Hell, Dan gleefully voted for the moron (Walz) who's been sitting quietly by as Somalis looted the federal treasury.
I support Jesus' welcoming approach to immigrants and agree with Jesus' condemnation of those who turn away immigrants, refugees and the needy.
And if you reject Jesus' teachings, well, that's on you.
I seem to remember that in the N.T. we are told to obey the laws of the land unless such laws violate God's law. Jesus would NOT welcome those who violate our laws by illegally entering this country. No one is turning away anyone coming in legally. So grow up, Danny girl.
Craig...
"Billions of dollars in fraud from Somali immigrants, along with kidnappings and rapes, and Dan can't bring himself to condemn those specific actions nor to acknowledge that his unlimited, unverified, immigration position has anything to do with this current predicament."
1. IF this fraud happened, I condemn it, because, of course I do. Again, no human comments on every misdeed. Not even Craig. Hell, you can't condemn indecent, criminal behavior from the president you voted for.
2. I do not HAVE an "unlimited, unverified, immigration position..." So, there's that. Read for understanding, sir.
The teachings of Jesus in no way rationalizes ignoring, dismissing or outright violating our laws. Anyone who aids and abets those who do are also acting contrary to the teachings of Jesus, as are those like Dan who exploit the term "Christian" to legitimize such criminality.
Real Christians don't libel people they don't know on the basis of nothing more than hearsay. Dan does, so what does that tell you about his claim of being a Christ follower?
That "monster", who is now OUR president, and not just mine or Craig's, never pushed policies which caused so much death and suffering as has the senile dude Dan asserted was a better man than our current president, or the empty suit who preceded our current president's first term. Neither of those Dan cites as better men than Trump has done a tenth of the good work Trump has done as president in less than half the years in office. Dan dismisses those who accused them of sexual perversions and predatory behavior while at the same time referring to Trump's accusers as "credible" with just as little evidence, though those who accused Biden and Obama said so publicly, continuously and without equivocation.
"That you are fine with it when you interpret the Bible as saying God allowed Israelites to kidnap foreign girls and make them their "wives" (ie, rape them), shows you are not really concerned with the oppression of women. Hell, you think God endorses it!"
That you are fine with saying this kind of crap while having never once provided a legitimate counter to the many interpretations which belie your vile claims and thus blasphemy, shows you've never truly "seriously and prayerfully" studied Scripture and don't "love" it at all.
"You all can't be taken seriously on matters of morality. You've thrown your credibility away to vote for a pervert felon."
This is rich coming from the guy who supports and enables sexual perversion and infanticide. On top of that, he thinks it's "moral" to accuse a better man of being a pervert for digging hot babes, and a felon...not because he actually perpetrated any felony...because a kangaroo court found him guilty of being one.
If you want to insist your president is actually overtly deviant, you'll have to provide actual, verifiable evidence of the claim. Does he have sex with men? I don't think so. Does he dress in women's clothes and call himself, "Nancy"? Not that anyone's ever suggested. Does he seek out minor aged girls for sex? No minor aged girl has ever made such a claim. Has he a history of dalliances with hot babes? No one denies it. None of that suggests "over deviancy" and only a defender of overt deviancy like you would dare be so stupidly false as to assert it does.
You who whines too often about having been slandered or of being the victim of malicious gossip are an overtly deviant hypocrite.
Art,
Dan's position on slander and libel has always been flexible. He's vehemently against it when he thinks other are doing it, while regularly engaging on the very behavior he condemns.
I'm confused about where Jesus specifically spoke on "immigration", especially "immigration" which involves violating the laws of the country being immigrated to.
This is clearly one more instance of imposing a 21st century liberal, political, worldview on scripture and an attempt to make US policy based on the twisting of scripture.
"IF"
And Dan demonstrates why no one takes him seriously.
1. I've provide multiple news sources (from Dan's approved list) documenting the fraud.
2. We've already had actual convictions for some of the fraud.
3. This excuse is getting old. It's not like this is some obscure story that hasn't been reported on. It couldn't be related to the fact that it's an example of policies of Dan's political ilk, and Dan's pet issue, resulting in massive fraud and actual harm to the poor and oppressed.
Are you claiming that you do not have this position now, or that you've never had it. By all means, be specific on what your actual position is. Because your previous "self determination" position seemed clear that you opposed any restriction on the ability of immigrants to exercise "self determination".
I'll note that, once again, you haven't condemned the specific instances of fraud which stole billions from both US taxpayers, and from the poor and oppressed, nor of the DFL political leadership which allowed the fraud to happen. Once more you pretend that this vague, general, milquetoast, "condemnation" absolves your from addressing specific instances of bad behavior on "your side" of the political aisle.
"Hell, you can't condemn indecent, criminal behavior from the president you voted for."
Well THIS is an intentional lie! We've both proclaimed loudly, boldly and directly our opposition to his philandering and womanizing. Craig, far far more than I've ever done, has criticized a number things about Trump's character and manner with regard to his presidential behavior. There is no criminal behavior on which to comment, and YOU haven't brought any evidence of any. But YOU, with your history of whining about being the victim of slander and gossip from us, as well as scolding us for allegedly perpetrating such about others you favor, are totally down with slandering Trump and gossiping about him. How incredibly you!
Art,
Great point. I missed responding to to because it is so glaringly obvious that we have both condemned or objected to various actions on the part of Trump. The difference between us and Dan seems to be that we look at each action or decision individually and evaluate the action, where Dan just has a blanket condemnation of everything Trump does or says.
Obviously, Dan's inability to produce evidence of any "criminal" behavior (at least none that isn't just his opinions) is a problem for him, as is his regular slander of Trump and any on the right.
"Dan's inability to produce evidence of any "criminal" behavior (at least none that isn't just his opinions) is a problem for him..."
He's literally a felon, convicted on 30+ criminal charges by a legitimate court by a jury of his peers.
Perhaps you missed it.
Marshal, missing the point, again, said:
We've both proclaimed loudly, boldly and directly our opposition to his philandering and womanizing.
The problem is that those are the LEAST of his misdeeds. It's like saying, "Oh, look, that Hitler cheated on his wife and I call that out! Shame on Hitler for cheating on his wife...!" NOT that I'm comparing Trump's vast misdeeds to the even more vast misdeeds of Hitler, it's just that you're missing the point.
WE DON'T CARE that you find it unpleasant that Trump is a serial cheater on his many wives, girlfriends and families.
It's his cold, calculated laughter at joking about sexual abuse ("grab them by the pussies!") and laughter that he can get away with it because he's a rich, powerful white jackass. It's his corruption in cheating employees for decades. It's his insane narcissism that makes him put his name all over the place. It's his corruption in abusing the power of his office to enrich himself and his family. It's his extrajudicial murders of people in other countries. It's him saying, "This was just a police action..." never mind that, 1. It wasn't and 2. In a normal police arrest of an alleged drug dealer, if the police MURDERED 80 civilians in the process, that police department would be in jail.
On and on, the abuses of power, the corruption, the actual criminal actions for which he's been convicted, the abuse of women AND CHILDREN!, it's the glee he has that he can get away with it as a wealthy privileged white male. It's his pretending that he's arresting Maduro because "drugs," while at the same time, giving a pardon to an actually convicted drug dealing millionaire. It's the way his pardons tend to go to those who can pay for them.
This man is an atrocity engaged in multiple evils in dozens of ways. The man is an asswipe stain on the already stained US history. Worst of all, the man has convinced millions of conservative Christians to support him, defend him and vote for him!
That you all don't see any of this is the problem.
May God remove the blinders from your eyes, break your hearts at your support of actual evil and save you from your own worst selves.
God have mercy!
To be fair, this conviction was the result of NY deliberately changing how they've charged similar behavior in the past, and bumping what would previously been charged as a single misdemeanor into multiple felonies.
So, to also be fair, at this point Trump has been convicted of a crime (appeals still ongoing), but hardly at the level of defrauding the US taxpayers of billions, and the poor, hungry, and sick of food and medical care.
If that's the moral equivalence you want to go with, be my guest.
Dan, choosing to ignore reality again, spews an entire comment without any actual proof of any of his claims. Of course, that Dan finds certain things icky is just his subjective response, not an objective standard.
Strangely enough, I don't recall Dan's outrage when P-BO MURDERED a US family in a drone strike which wasn't approved by congress or any of the multitude of other bombings and drone strikes P-BO engaged in. The official position of the US (pre Trump) was that Maduro was not the legitimately elected president of Venezuela and had a $25,000,000 bounty placed on him by Biden.
Because Maduro destroying Venezuela's economy, oppressing his subjects, stealing and profiting from resources, facilitating and profiting from drug trafficking, isn't evil at all. Of course, the fact that he was merely brought to the US to face the charges against him brought by a grand jury is getting due process, is also evil.
My blinders are off, I see and call out evil regularly.
"a legitimate court"
Hardly. Two Hillary supporting legal scholars, Jonathan Turley and Alan Dershowitz totally ripped this notion. He was absolutely wrongly convicted, but you're too much a liar to acknowledge what so many clearly see.
"It's his cold, calculated laughter at joking about sexual abuse ("grab them by the pussies!") "
Still lying about this, while pretending Trump's sexual history is not your major issue of discussion. He didn't "laugh" about doing what he never did. He simply asserted the truth of the type of women who seek the company of rich celebrities like him and what they're willing to do to be accepted by them. I played the video for you on more than one occasion where this was proven...OBJECTIVELY...you lying pervert.
"The man is an asswipe stain on the already stained US history."
Says a true skid mark on the shorts of humanity.
Dan has gotten more mileage out of that one quote, which he repeatedly mischaracterizes, than just about any of his straw men.
Trump was clearly stating an unfortunate Truth about SOME women and how they respond to men with power and wealth. This Truth is unseemly, and unpleasant, but the fact is that a certain subset of WOMEN and a certain subset of men engage in behavior that most would find offensive based on money, fame, and power.
While I agree that his conviction was problematic from a number of aspects, the reality is that he was convicted and until the conviction is overturned, his status is unchanged.
Craig:
Trump was clearly stating an unfortunate Truth about SOME women and how they respond to men with power and wealth.
Also Craig:
My blinders are off, I see and call out evil regularly.
Wow. He just doesn't see it. He feigns independent thinking and being "blinder-free," then defends an evil, vulgar, deviant human being with a best guess defense of what Craig apparently THINKS the Felon was saying, in spite of what he was actually saying.
The blindness runs deep. The brainwashing has taken.
Wow, he just can't stop pretending that his straw men represent reality.
That I'm not "defending" anyone doesn't seem to register in Dan's world. Noting the reality that throughout history rich, powerful, people have engaged in unsavory behavior and that some people are motivated to try to attract those with power and wealth by any means necessary, isn't to defend or encourage either. It's merely noting reality.
That Dan's fantasy is based on facts not in evidence (as they say in court) doesn't stop Dan from asserting that his fantasies are True.
Strangely enough, Dan ignores the fact that left leaning legal experts (as Art noted) agree that the prosecution of Trump was improper. Yet Dan chooses to ignore experts and rely on his vaunted Reason.
Dan's problem is that all he needs to do is to provide objective proof that Trump did actually "grab" women in the manner noted, specifically who, what, where, and when. If Trump had done so, it seems unlikely that absolutely no one has ever come forward to confirm that this actually happened.
It's a simple matter of proof, which Dan doesn't do.
"He feigns independent thinking and being "blinder-free," then defends an evil, vulgar, deviant human"
In what way was Craig ever defending you?
Post a Comment