Thursday, October 31, 2024

A Few More Tidbits

 https://x.com/sonofhas/status/1851706891572846687?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

This seems like it could be a bad thing.

 https://x.com/joshuaschriver/status/1851706273097748899?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Fortunately the GOP jumped on this, and determined that the votes would not be counted.  Nonetheless, the fact that the MI system allowed over a hundred thousand bad votes seems concerning.   At least we know this now.  

https://x.com/trumpwarroom/status/1851599770579538012?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

This notion that the left can use all sorts of pejorative terms to refer to their political enemies, yet hypocritically claim they want unity is simply bullshit.   It's the same sort of thing Dan does when he unleashes all sorts of vitriol towards us, then tries to pretend the we're all "brothers" or some such idiocy.  It's good to see CBS calling this out. 

https://x.com/ianonpatriot/status/1850981994936611152?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Between this and the P2025 ads, Harris is just making shit up and her minions just mindlessly accept everything she says.  


4 comments:

Marshal Art said...

1. It is a bad thing, of course. The problem is that there was no verification that this guy was a citizen and eligible to vote. Hopefully he voted for Trump. I'm certain that if illegals were helping Trump win, and Dems lose, Dems would quickly flip from their false arguments for blocking election integrity measures and would be fervent in their desire to see them implemented and strictly enforced. That doesn't mean they still wouldn't cheat. They'd just have to get craftier.

2. Conversely (referencing point 1), this is a good thing. Sadly, it accounts for only one form of cheating. Yet, by that measure, it seems quite a large amount of illegal votes. Add illegal votes submitted by other means of cheating and to suggest that such wouldn't alter the outcome of an election is to lie. To pretend it doesn't happen on this scale in enough states to make a difference is to lie as well.

And of course to suggest it didn't play a roll in the outcome of 2020 is to identify one's self as a moron.

3. That Walz responded as he did exposes again the truly poor cut of his jib.

I'm not so bothered by what someone might call me as I am by their false explanation for why they did so, or their inability to truly explain it at all. Then, it's just a cheap and worthless disparaging epithet or pejorative which has no power or affect over me.

4. That she's lying about Trump's proposal (which I oppose, by the way). But what she's saying would mean nothing worse than making all hourly workers salaried positions. Salaried people don't make extra dough for working past forty hours. And so long as the formerly hourly paid workers aren't docked for working less than forty hours, there's no difference between the two, except that many who will only take hourly paid gigs do so because they can make more by putting in more than forty hours.

My last job was an hourly gig which didn't pay time and a half for working beyond one's shift. There was a wide variety of schedule lengths available (in terms of both hours per day and days per week) for which one could bid. What you were paid was based upon the anticipated hours it would take to complete one's day at the $/hr rate, but if one finished early, one was paid the full amount. If one was somehow kept longer or chose to work longer, one was paid additional hours and the standard #/hr rate. Many bitched about not getting time and a half, but I maintained that though regrettable (to say the least), applicants knew going it that's how they did things and they're within their rights to pay as they see fit. Don't like it? Seek a gig elsewhere.

BTW, the previous gig didn't pay OT until after forty hours were accrued. Thus, if you worked forty-five hours by Thursday, but missed five hours of work on Friday, you didn't receive any OT pay because you only worked forty hours total for the week. In the industry I worked, other gigs didn't pay time and a half until one worked 55 hours for the week. All is beneath criticism as regards fair labor practices because it's stated up front and people take the gigs.

But in any case, Harris is lying once again, or was too lazy to either research what she thought was Trump's proposal or is too stupid to understand something so simple. Oh yeah! She and Walz are much better for the nation that Trump and Vance. Right. Sure.

Craig said...

1. I agree with your premise that if things were flipped the DFL would complain. However, I don't want to see either party win because of illegal votes. I don't want citizens disenfranchised because on non citizens voting. Whether it's 1 or 1 million, it doesn't matter.

2. Yes, staying on top of situations like this is a good thing. That the GOP didn't do so in 2020 and therefore we don't know what the extent was seems like a lesson learned. Again, 1 illegal vote is too many.

3. That Walz and the left can't see that their own actions are part of the problem is a sign of either ignorance or idiocy.

4. The only real relevant thing this illustrates is the willingness of Harris/Walz to (not only) lie, but to make up incredibly stupid lies. That one of the leaders of the think tank responsible for P2025 is a Harris supporter somehow gets lost in the bullshit, let alone the fact that Trump isn't advocating for P20205 in any way. The reality seems to be the all too many DFL voters are too partisan or too stupid to fact check their candidates, and the candidates simply assume that to be the case and don't bother with the Truth.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

What is so difficult about just subtracting that illegal vote?!?!

That Michigan fraud is flabbergasting! The fact that they can do that to start with shows that there is more of this crap that hasn’t been caught.

The Demokrats have no real arguments so they have to resort to ad hominem attacks; unfortunately, the stupid people think those attacks are what’s important.

It’s amazing how many on the LEFT will believe every single thing the lying flat-backer says.

Craig said...

In theory, it should be possible up until the point where the entire vote is certified. Especially when it's so well attested by the illegal voter.

That we had to go through 2020 to get to the point where this sort of fraud is found before the election is frustrating, but being prepared for it and having observers in place should help going forward.

They really haven't had much of an argument for much of anything since the 90s, but now they'd consider Clinton's positions as "extremely right wing". So they resort to ad homs, lies, distortions, and cheating because it's all they have.

The only issue they actually have a relatively consistent position on is abortion, but personally I'm not sure killing off their voters before they're born is a good long term strategy.

The ability of those on the left to accept so many flat out lies, that have been repeatedly debunked is impressive if delusional.