https://x.com/jgwestdi/status/1843464540555751723?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/07/us/politics/porn-actors-project-2025-ad.html
There was a time, not so long ago, when the backing of the "porn industry" was something no candidate wanted. Well for all the progressive christians, and big Eva folks who're supporting Harris, y'all are now in bed with the "porn industry".
https://x.com/jasonmillerindc/status/1843443034416923075?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
The DFL is purging itself.
https://x.com/mattdizwhitlock/status/1843451425650835578?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
If Trump's campaign people are smart, they'll simply let Harris speak for herself (incoherently) and plaster her own words all over the media.
I don't have a link, but in a local congressional race the liberal, upper class, white woman is bashing the crap out of the brown, legal immigrant, veteran, guy.
https://x.com/gunthereagleman/status/1843351487025463654?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
I don't know how to Handle CNN all of a sudden actually holding leftists accountable.
https://x.com/petersweden7/status/1843364938108285381?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Believe the "experts" on climate change, they said. Cut down millions of trees for solar, they said. Spend millions on machines that do what the trees did before they cut them down.
https://x.com/noahpollak/status/1843346449200992761?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Harris and the left are big on letters like this, when they criticize Trump. Probably not going to pay attention to this one.
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1843090083240644987?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
At best this seems unethical.
https://x.com/hameturgeman/status/1843336361283145968?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Compare and contrast actions, not words.
https://x.com/gragedustin/status/1843289703505908054?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
When the "real journalists" at the "revered" MSM start putting this stuff out, it's probably pretty bad.
https://x.com/mike_palicz/status/1843049128944972144?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
What would Harris know about what it takes to start a business?
https://x.com/imbrettcooper/status/1843348346167275928?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Interesting choices. Harris chooses sex and relationships, trump chooses the economy. FWIW, the Harris episode of the podcast performed dismally.
Just curious. How the hell does George Soros, liberal billionaire, get fast tracked to by 200 radio stations. Anyone wanna bet how quickly any conservative voices are summarily dropped from those stations? Anyone wanna bet how much free advertising he'll run before the election if he gats control that soon?
3 comments:
Believe the "experts" on climate change, they said. Cut down millions of trees for solar, they said.
Does it never occur to you to fact check? Or even stop. THINK a minute about what you're writing. THEN considering how rational or crazy you might sound?
Of course, progressives environmentalists and experts are not calling to cut down more trees.
Does it bother you that you can not cite EVEN ONE expert who suggested to Scotland they should cut down millions of trees?
https://fullfact.org/online/scotland-17m-trees/
That's as far as I got on your "twitter-reporting." Listen to experts, stop making things up. Be the good and rational man that you know you should be.
"Does it never occur to you to fact check? Or even stop. THINK a minute about what you're writing. THEN considering how rational or crazy you might sound?"
Yes, I regularly do so.
https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2024/05/10/more-than-1-million-trees-cut-down-for-wind-turbines-last-year-17-million-over-24-years/
https://www.gov.scot/publications/eir-202400407867/
So you cite an article which is based on data that is at least 2 years old, and which limits the tree removal to only "government land". Yet I quickly found multiple sources (posted two) which support the claim in the post I mentioned. Nice try.
"Of course, progressives environmentalists and experts are not calling to cut down more trees."
Yet tens of millions of mature trees ARE being cut down in Scotland for the express purpose of erecting solar and wind farms, and the BBC is reporting that a CO2 removal facility is being erected in Scotland. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57588248
While the tweet might not have perfectly captured every single detail, it seems like it IS substantially correct.
"Does it bother you that you can not cite EVEN ONE expert who suggested to Scotland they should cut down millions of trees?"
Nope. If you are arguing that the Scots cut down 10s of millions of trees to build solar and wind farms without expert advice, I guess that's one option. Maybe they just started cutting without consulting any "experts". Nice try.
https://fullfact.org/online/scotland-17m-trees/
"That's as far as I got on your "twitter-reporting." Listen to experts, stop making things up. Be the good and rational man that you know you should be."
It's always gratifying when you fail to do what you demand of others, and get all condescending and superior, only to be proven wrong.
You literally found one tiny, potential, "mistake" (and took my snark for seriousness) in ONE of many items and think that you've won some momentous victory. Then I fact check you into defeat.
What's hilarious is that according to your old story acknowledges that 14 million trees WERE felled for solar and wind, and that doesn't seem to bother you. Of course the fact that more trees might have been felled since 2022 probably never entered your mind.
Post a Comment