https://x.com/irenebritusa/status/1897018498443792871?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
It's stories like this that demonstrates that when the DFL wears pink to support "women's rights" they really only mean the right of women to end the lives of their children up to birth and to push their children into irreversible medical procedures that will likely ruin the lives of their children.
8 comments:
I would hope that if scouts were present to see a girl like this cheated of 1st or 2nd place by a dude, they'd be smart & honest enough to choose as if the disordered dude wasn't even there. They don't have to pretend the disordered dude is a girl just because he's been enabled by morons.
You'd hope...
The girls/women need to stop competing when a guy is there. Some have begun but until all stop, it will go on and on.
I agree that simply refusing to compete is likely the only option to really stop this. At some point the thrill of competing against no one will pale and they'll get bored. As long as they can beat lesser competition, they'll likely continue.
The obvious downside being those females who've devoted their time and effort to achieve in their chosen sport will never have any chance to make it a profession and those who have to make that choice as a professional may lose their position among the pros. It must be a legislative issue in favor of women's sports and privacy.
And I don't think there needs to be any separate facilities or sports leagues to accommodate these people. It's not even akin to the Special Olympics. These "trans" people are simply mentally ill and need their disorder treated, not enabled with "a league of their own" (a good movie, actually).
While I agree that it could be a problem for those who are at the margins. The reality is that Caitlin Clark would still be playing professionally even had she sat out some competitions.
It also hinges on the self interest of other institutions. If college A, actually wants the best women, they'll evaluate the women, even if they have to be creative about it.
You also have to deal with the literal, physical, risk to women playing against men. What good is it if you're an awesome athlete and play against a team with a dude if you end up with a TBI and lose a year or more?
I don't have a problem with legislation, but we all know that the DFL will change the legislation every chance they have so that's not a permanent solution.
I disagree. If a private organization wants to form a "trans" league at some level, who cares. Nobody will watch and there are so few "trans" people that they won't be able to field teams, but who cares. If they want to waste money, that's their choice.
With what are you disagreeing? That there doesn't NEED to be separate leagues to accommodate the mentally disordered. This isn't to say some lunkhead might think money can be made by trying to form them. I'm saying there's no need to accommodate the disordered in such an endeavor. That is, there's no need beyond their desire and certainly no need for anyone to feel compelled to accommodate that desire.
How is pointing out the reality that a private entity could choose to establish a sports league for "trans" athletes disagreeing? I was under the impression that the US allowed private entities to establish enterprises with little restriction. I fail to see how a billionaire who wants to start the "TBA" ("trans" basketball association) should or could be prevented from doing so. It seems like a bad investment, but not illegal.
We don't NEED cars that go faster then 70 MPH, guns that hold more than 10 rounds, a women's flag football league, or millions of other things. We live in a society that for virtually 100% of the population does not NEED anything. We're in a want society, not a NEED society. If some rich idiot wants to start the TBA, why do I care and why would I stop them? Who's talking about compelling anything? Again, since when do we stop private entities from pursuing their desires as long as those desires are legal?
Post a Comment