The problem you all have is that, of course, if it were proven that Obama cheated people anywhere near the numbers in ways that your corrupt president has, we would condemn it and we would support appropriate legal action. If it were proven that Obama cheated even one person, we would support appropriate legal actions.
However a single unproven accusation is not proof. The problem you have is you give unlimited grace to a known corrupt hedonist liar time and time and time and time and time again, over and over and over. At some point you have to say that jackass is just the criminal he appears to be whereas you find one single report unproven against Obama and you're jumping on it as if it's a fact.
Now the real question is if it turns out this is a false accusation or just a misunderstanding, will you: 1. apologize for jumping to conclusions 2. apologize for supporting your known deviant for much worse while we stood ready to hold Obama accountable?
You're right about exactly one thing and one thing only, Craig. There's not a chance in hell we will pass on unproven accusations as if they were facts. We're not slanderers who are REALLY looking for misdeeds from a man who is, on the face of it, a very good and Christian man. The same can't be said about your pervert con man.
"P-BO just stiffed various contractors for tens of millions of dollars."
1. I'm having a hard time finding news stories on this story. That is, in and of itself, a red flag.
2. There are accusations, unproven so far, that the FOUNDATION working to build this building may not have fully paid all the contractors...
OR maybe it's the case that the CONTRACTORS hired by the foundation, those contractors, have not fully paid their subcontractors. Again the news is not clear and certainly not proven.
3. Thus it's a stupid and false lie to say that Obama has stiffed anyone. It's vulgar and no doubt evidence of just partisan bigotry rather than a real concern for unpaid workers, given your history of supporting the con man you voted for repeatedly.
4. In all likelihood this appears to be just some disputes that happen and they WILL be resolved. If crimes were actually done or misdeeds were done, you can bet that progressives will be on the side of the workers. Don't be an ass and don't be a gullible hypocritical ass.
What I saw was a black contractor (the only contractors given contracts for work...the racist pigs!) complaining he hasn't been paid, and a story related other similar complaints by many whose very livelihoods are in jeopardy if Obama defaults or delays.
What you've is leftist reports of Trump reneging on payments while saying the work done was not what he paid to receive, was not done on time and other such complaints, all of which you choose to believe without the slightest verification or confirmation simply because it is Trump who's accused. Who do you think you're kidding?
Moreover, somehow you think it matters which of the two stiffed more people ("anywhere near the numbers" of what Trump is alleged to have failed to pay). You really need to stop pretending you're a Christian. Non one here is buying it.
Those Dan worships (Obama) are always innocent little lambs. Those Dan hates (Trump, his supporters, conservatives and actual Christians in general) are always ravenous wolves guilty of any hint of an infraction. That's what "embrace grace" looks like from a fake Christian like Dan.
How did you find those stories??? Dan looked EVERYWHERE!.
Notable in the first link is the buck-passing. According to their excuse making, one need only find someone...anyone...to do the hiring and paying and if they don't pay off who they hire, it's on them, not the person who found them for the purpose. How convenient! Good enough for Dan, that's for sure!
I just couldn’t take any more of Dan’s excuses and BS about this. The lengths he’s going to in order to absolve P-BO of any responsibility are impressive even for him.
It’s not like P-BO couldn’t afford to just pay the contractors to avoid the bad PR and worked it out later.
But Trump….
The building is still an ugly brutalist monstrosity and Dan’s excuses won’t change that.
FYI, I’ve regularly pointed out when Trump as done things that simply look bad.
Yes perhaps. Rarely and barely. Although it didn't stop you from voting for him.
And as far as I know even though he's clearly cheated and abused the court system to avoid paying his employees, you've never once said that he's stealing or stiffing his workers. In spite of reality.
On the other hand you regularly point to things that Biden and Obama have merely been accused of, with no proof, as if the mere accusation meant they were awful people. Including in this case where you made the weak-minded claim that Obama is stiffing his employees. You're being obtuse and partisan and a hypocrite. A damned hypocrite. Everyone can see it.
You're slandering, gossiping, being a little pissant for partisan's sake and ignoring the greater evil. You're straining out the gnat and swallowing the whole damned camel.
Go ahead, step up. Condemn Trump right now for stiffing his workers and failing to pay them, just like you did with Obama with much less cause.
And when you DON'T do it (and of course you won't because you're a coward and a hypocrite), everyone will see what a damned hypocrite you are being. That's on you.
I've got no problem criticizing Trump if there is more than just TDS allegations without a shred of detail. When fake Christian marixists like Dan accuse anyone, I'd be remiss if I gave the time of day simply based on their word...which isn't worth crap.
Making false accusations and continuing with your unhinged rants is not a good way to keep your comments from being aborted. Your combination of narcissism and bias along with your monomaniacal obsession with making everything about Trump is not helping you.
I was going to apologize for my actions yesterday, because allowing people to see your ranting is probably the best choice I could make. But you went where you went and the vacuum sucked one more away.
Dan's comment on June 19, 2026 at 6:07 PM is an example of the very dishonesty we've come to enjoy so much. Trump's "clearly cheated and abused the court system to avoid paying his employees"??? Prove it. You've never done that and I doubt you can do it now, so it's best you stop slandering, gossiping and being a little pissant for partisan's sake. The greater evil is YOU. You're being obtuse and partisan and a hypocrite. A damned hypocrite. Everyone can see it.
a) Obama's not stiffing anyone. His foundation is. b) Trump never stiffed anyone. His corporation did.
Dan is quick to absolve Obama of wrongdoing in "a" but doesn't give Trump the same "grace" by accepting "b" just as quickly. But hey...all that matters is that those Dan hates be hated by all, while those Dan loves be loved by all.
As to "proof"....another word Dan doesn't understand, Craig provided two links to news reports Dan pretend to have searched without finding which speaks to the allegations against Obama. These links provide details regarding the allegations and complaints against Obama for failing to pay those building that unsightly edifice of self-aggrandizement. With Dan's allegations against Trump, we get nothing but Dan's repetition of lefty talking points.
And now, without any evidence that Trump stiffed anyone, he demands we get on board with his Trump-hatred and condemn Trump for that for which Dan has no evidence of any kind, simply because Dan demands we "embrace hate".
The above gives some detail, but it still fails to resolve the notion of "stiffing" those who deserved to be paid. Dan chooses to believe every negative allegation against Trump because Dan likes to "embrace hate". Because Trump is accused, therefore Trump is guilty. It's no deeper than that for Dan.
Conversely, we prefer something more concrete in the way of evidence leaving no shadow of doubt before we'd lower ourselves to Dan's contemptible level. Dan chooses to believe every accusation without a single thought to the possibility that some contractors/subcontractors are less than reputable, efficient or dedicated to doing the best job possible, and yet they will whine about being stiffed.
In the meantime, I don't know the details regarding which side is telling the full unvarnished truth...or even thinks they are. But Dan embraces hate for Donald Trump and that's all that matters.
Obama, on the other hand...well, this guy who's never worked a day in his life is beyond question a man of absolutely integrity simply because Dan says so, and also without a shred of evidence to back it up.
You can't go wrong either way, Craig. Delete him or publish him. It doesn't matter. We know what we're going to get: absolutely nothing he demands form us at his Blog of Lies and Perversions.
There is some Truth to that. It’s more about the fact that I’ve been upfront about saying that I would allow his comments. There’s an element of feeling like I’ve become him by simply aborting his comments. Yes, they were unhinged, rambling, and a litany of his off topic greatest hits. But I think there is some value in allowing Dan to show everyone else who he really is, not his curated caricature that he presents. The lies, attacks, and the rest, are part and parcel of who he is.
All of the above sounds reasonable. The thing is that P-BO could have stepped up, paid the contractors, (maybe even a bonus) and reaped a huge PR bonanza, instead he and his shills chose the path we see Dan take.
The same folx who want to take a big chuck of money from Musk, can’t even say anything about P-BO when he’s got more than enough money to pay these people from his own vast wealth.
Trump’s company legally availed himself of bankruptcy laws, P-BO simply isn’t paying these people. For the work they did on this ugly boondoggle which cost an absurd amount of money. How many poor people could have been fed by the billions spent on this brutalist nightmare? Wouldn’t eradicating poverty in Chicago have been a better legacy?
26 comments:
I made mention of this as well on FB. But I'm sure Dan and his troll will have posts chastising Obama for this abuse of power and wealth any day now.
--Art
Not a chance in hell
The problem you all have is that, of course, if it were proven that Obama cheated people anywhere near the numbers in ways that your corrupt president has, we would condemn it and we would support appropriate legal action. If it were proven that Obama cheated even one person, we would support appropriate legal actions.
However a single unproven accusation is not proof. The problem you have is you give unlimited grace to a known corrupt hedonist liar time and time and time and time and time again, over and over and over. At some point you have to say that jackass is just the criminal he appears to be whereas you find one single report unproven against Obama and you're jumping on it as if it's a fact.
Your hypocrisy is showing.
Dan
Now the real question is if it turns out this is a false accusation or just a misunderstanding, will you:
1. apologize for jumping to conclusions
2. apologize for supporting your known deviant for much worse while we stood ready to hold Obama accountable?
But then we know the answer to that.
Dan
You're right about exactly one thing and one thing only, Craig. There's not a chance in hell we will pass on unproven accusations as if they were facts. We're not slanderers who are REALLY looking for misdeeds from a man who is, on the face of it, a very good and Christian man. The same can't be said about your pervert con man.
Dan
Based on the comments in moderation, we have our answer.
P-BO is a saint, it’s all lies, because…Trump.
The question then becomes whether or not Dan will retract what he’s said after rushing to a conclusion.
FYI, as far as Chicago goes, the Trump building is pretty attractive, the P-BO brutalist monstrosity, not so much.
Craig slandered...
"P-BO just stiffed various contractors for tens of millions of dollars."
1. I'm having a hard time finding news stories on this story. That is, in and of itself, a red flag.
2. There are accusations, unproven so far, that the FOUNDATION working to build this building may not have fully paid all the contractors...
OR maybe it's the case that the CONTRACTORS hired by the foundation, those contractors, have not fully paid their subcontractors. Again the news is not clear and certainly not proven.
3. Thus it's a stupid and false lie to say that Obama has stiffed anyone. It's vulgar and no doubt evidence of just partisan bigotry rather than a real concern for unpaid workers, given your history of supporting the con man you voted for repeatedly.
4. In all likelihood this appears to be just some disputes that happen and they WILL be resolved. If crimes were actually done or misdeeds were done, you can bet that progressives will be on the side of the workers. Don't be an ass and don't be a gullible hypocritical ass.
It's not a good look.
Dan.
Because P-BO has absolutely no connections with the foundation with his name on it or a building with his name on it.
Dude has hundreds of millions, step up and pay.
Because P-BO has absolutely no connections with the foundation with his name on it or a building with his name on it.
Dude has hundreds of millions, step up and pay.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/subcontractors-say-theyre-owed-millions-face-financial-ruin-helping-build-obama-presidential-center.amp
https://www.enr.com/articles/63172-obama-center-opens-the-doors-as-subcontractors-say-invoices-remain-unpaid
Dan's knee jerk response is pretty damn funny. The answer to Art’s question is pretty obvious.
According to Greg Gutfeld, Stevie Wonder was at the festivities. Even he said it looked like crap!
What I saw was a black contractor (the only contractors given contracts for work...the racist pigs!) complaining he hasn't been paid, and a story related other similar complaints by many whose very livelihoods are in jeopardy if Obama defaults or delays.
What you've is leftist reports of Trump reneging on payments while saying the work done was not what he paid to receive, was not done on time and other such complaints, all of which you choose to believe without the slightest verification or confirmation simply because it is Trump who's accused. Who do you think you're kidding?
Moreover, somehow you think it matters which of the two stiffed more people ("anywhere near the numbers" of what Trump is alleged to have failed to pay). You really need to stop pretending you're a Christian. Non one here is buying it.
Those Dan worships (Obama) are always innocent little lambs. Those Dan hates (Trump, his supporters, conservatives and actual Christians in general) are always ravenous wolves guilty of any hint of an infraction. That's what "embrace grace" looks like from a fake Christian like Dan.
How did you find those stories??? Dan looked EVERYWHERE!.
Notable in the first link is the buck-passing. According to their excuse making, one need only find someone...anyone...to do the hiring and paying and if they don't pay off who they hire, it's on them, not the person who found them for the purpose. How convenient! Good enough for Dan, that's for sure!
I just couldn’t take any more of Dan’s excuses and BS about this. The lengths he’s going to in order to absolve P-BO of any responsibility are impressive even for him.
It’s not like P-BO couldn’t afford to just pay the contractors to avoid the bad PR and worked it out later.
But Trump….
The building is still an ugly brutalist monstrosity and Dan’s excuses won’t change that.
FYI, I’ve regularly pointed out when Trump as done things that simply look bad.
I used Google.
Yes perhaps. Rarely and barely. Although it didn't stop you from voting for him.
And as far as I know even though he's clearly cheated and abused the court system to avoid paying his employees, you've never once said that he's stealing or stiffing his workers. In spite of reality.
On the other hand you regularly point to things that Biden and Obama have merely been accused of, with no proof, as if the mere accusation meant they were awful people. Including in this case where you made the weak-minded claim that Obama is stiffing his employees. You're being obtuse and partisan and a hypocrite. A damned hypocrite. Everyone can see it.
You're slandering, gossiping, being a little pissant for partisan's sake and ignoring the greater evil. You're straining out the gnat and swallowing the whole damned camel.
Go ahead, step up. Condemn Trump right now for stiffing his workers and failing to pay them, just like you did with Obama with much less cause.
And when you DON'T do it (and of course you won't because you're a coward and a hypocrite), everyone will see what a damned hypocrite you are being. That's on you.
Dan
I've got no problem criticizing Trump if there is more than just TDS allegations without a shred of detail. When fake Christian marixists like Dan accuse anyone, I'd be remiss if I gave the time of day simply based on their word...which isn't worth crap.
Dan,
Making false accusations and continuing with your unhinged rants is not a good way to keep your comments from being aborted. Your combination of narcissism and bias along with your monomaniacal obsession with making everything about Trump is not helping you.
I was going to apologize for my actions yesterday, because allowing people to see your ranting is probably the best choice I could make. But you went where you went and the vacuum sucked one more away.
You’ve missed my point, but whatever.
Dan's comment on June 19, 2026 at 6:07 PM is an example of the very dishonesty we've come to enjoy so much. Trump's "clearly cheated and abused the court system to avoid paying his employees"??? Prove it. You've never done that and I doubt you can do it now, so it's best you stop slandering, gossiping and being a little pissant for partisan's sake. The greater evil is YOU. You're being obtuse and partisan and a hypocrite. A damned hypocrite. Everyone can see it.
a) Obama's not stiffing anyone. His foundation is.
b) Trump never stiffed anyone. His corporation did.
Dan is quick to absolve Obama of wrongdoing in "a" but doesn't give Trump the same "grace" by accepting "b" just as quickly. But hey...all that matters is that those Dan hates be hated by all, while those Dan loves be loved by all.
As to "proof"....another word Dan doesn't understand, Craig provided two links to news reports Dan pretend to have searched without finding which speaks to the allegations against Obama. These links provide details regarding the allegations and complaints against Obama for failing to pay those building that unsightly edifice of self-aggrandizement. With Dan's allegations against Trump, we get nothing but Dan's repetition of lefty talking points.
And now, without any evidence that Trump stiffed anyone, he demands we get on board with his Trump-hatred and condemn Trump for that for which Dan has no evidence of any kind, simply because Dan demands we "embrace hate".
https://factually.co/fact-checks/business/donald-trump-unpaid-contractors-subcontractors-history-0a564a
The above gives some detail, but it still fails to resolve the notion of "stiffing" those who deserved to be paid. Dan chooses to believe every negative allegation against Trump because Dan likes to "embrace hate". Because Trump is accused, therefore Trump is guilty. It's no deeper than that for Dan.
Conversely, we prefer something more concrete in the way of evidence leaving no shadow of doubt before we'd lower ourselves to Dan's contemptible level. Dan chooses to believe every accusation without a single thought to the possibility that some contractors/subcontractors are less than reputable, efficient or dedicated to doing the best job possible, and yet they will whine about being stiffed.
In the meantime, I don't know the details regarding which side is telling the full unvarnished truth...or even thinks they are. But Dan embraces hate for Donald Trump and that's all that matters.
Obama, on the other hand...well, this guy who's never worked a day in his life is beyond question a man of absolutely integrity simply because Dan says so, and also without a shred of evidence to back it up.
You can't go wrong either way, Craig. Delete him or publish him. It doesn't matter. We know what we're going to get: absolutely nothing he demands form us at his Blog of Lies and Perversions.
There is some Truth to that. It’s more about the fact that I’ve been upfront about saying that I would allow his comments. There’s an element of feeling like I’ve become him by simply aborting his comments. Yes, they were unhinged, rambling, and a litany of his off topic greatest hits. But I think there is some value in allowing Dan to show everyone else who he really is, not his curated caricature that he presents. The lies, attacks, and the rest, are part and parcel of who he is.
All of the above sounds reasonable. The thing is that P-BO could have stepped up, paid the contractors, (maybe even a bonus) and reaped a huge PR bonanza, instead he and his shills chose the path we see Dan take.
The same folx who want to take a big chuck of money from Musk, can’t even say anything about P-BO when he’s got more than enough money to pay these people from his own vast wealth.
Trump’s company legally availed himself of bankruptcy laws, P-BO simply isn’t paying these people. For the work they did on this ugly boondoggle which cost an absurd amount of money. How many poor people could have been fed by the billions spent on this brutalist nightmare? Wouldn’t eradicating poverty in Chicago have been a better legacy?
https://x.com/250_Revolution/status/2067947230321926472/video/1?s=46
BVMLTT
Post a Comment