https://x.com/maddytx76/status/2100350013155283428?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" Interesting how nudity was called empowering and feminist when Megan Rapinoe, Sue Bird, or Emily Ratajkowski did it, but suddenly becomes ‘setting women back 100 years’ when Sydney Sweeney does it. Maybe the issue isn’t nudity—maybe it’s who is doing it and whether you agree with her politics."
https://x.com/evie_magazine/status/2100241340327948580?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
""If sexual liberation is empowering, why is everyone mad at Sydney Sweeney? Didn’t ESPN famously publish an entire Body Issue where actual female athletes were photographed naked? So naked female athletes can be empowering, but a naked actress holding sporting equipment is degrading to female athletes? I thought feminism was about 'choice.' 'Sex work is real work.' OnlyFans can be empowering. Selling pictures of your naked body can be empowering. Women should be free to do whatever they want with their bodies, and judging another woman’s sexual choices is prudish, patriarchal, and probably some sort of internalized misogyny. We’ve heard some version of this for years. But… women are saying, it’s empowering if you do it for you! Not if you’re doing it for men! Who exactly do we think is paying for women’s OnlyFans subscriptions? Do you know any women with an OnlyFans subscription? Yeah, me either. If being naked and sexy is liberating, then why is Sydney Sweeney such a threat?" Read the full article: bit.ly/3Ve33tG"
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdXt4TchMvv/?stkn=MTZ0NmZibGlsbzdkeQ==
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdPrnC8O0kJ/?stkn=ZGptbWw3bXU3M2N4
2 comments:
This exposure of the LEFT's hypocrisy with Sweeney is all over the 'net, as well it should be.
Yes, she is exposed all over the place. While I personally am not a fan of the ads, she is an adult and has the agency to choose how she presents herself in public. The rank hypocrisy of those who are freaking out, who also support OF and porn as empowering, is ridiculous.
Post a Comment