Watching the ASPL cheer a bunch of white Karens Karensplain to the one juror who was doing his job was bad enough. Watching the response when the fact that the holdout was black is disgusting. The rabid mob protecting a woman who killed her 3 children (post natal abortion?), demonstrates the vile disregard for human life by the ASPL. It’s even worse to see the MSM jumping on board to go after the juror. Clearly the goal, at some level, is to warn future jurors of the risks of going against the mob. Just like the threats of violence that influenced the Chauvin jurors
https://x.com/morganisawizard/status/2098542666510381445?s=46&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"this is some of the most disgusting news reporting i have ever seen. it’s absolutely insane to think you could be forcibly conscripted into jury duty at any time and have your entire life completely excavated by the media if you vote unacceptably. the unanimous verdict requirement exists precisely so one person can refuse to go along. if being that person now means risking all of your laundry being aired out to your community that can easily identify you, we’ve essentially converted unanimity to majority rule by int
https://x.com/anne66213/status/2098674262605500516?s=46&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
What NBC10 Boston has done to the lone holdout juror is a journalistic disgrace. After eleven white jurors failed to pressure the jury’s only Black member into abandoning his independent judgment, NBC10 effectively joined the campaign to destroy him.
While the jury list remains judicially impounded, NBC10 repeatedly approached this private citizen’s home, contacted his estranged relatives and former wife, searched through his housing records, publicized his unpaid rent and eviction, repeated a relative’s insult that he is a “narcissist,” and resurrected domestic-violence allegations wholly unrelated to Lindsay Clancy’s criminal responsibility.
NBC10 buried the crucial facts. The 2021 criminal charge was dismissed. Allegations in a restraining-order proceeding are not criminal convictions. Financial problems have absolutely nothing to do with whether Clancy knew that strangling her three children was wrong. None of this refutes the juror’s evidence-based concerns about the sequential killings and Clancy’s deliberate actions afterward.
Most disgracefully, NBC10 insinuated that the juror may have answered his questionnaire dishonestly, and even suggested possible criminal conduct, while admitting that the questionnaire is confidential, that the station has never seen it and that it cannot confirm how he answered. That is not responsible investigative journalism. It is speculation carefully arranged to resemble proof.
A confidential questionnaire issue, if one exists, belongs before the judge, not in a televised character-assassination campaign. NBC10 had no legitimate reason to publish this man’s rent problems or broadcast insults from estranged relatives. Those details were included for one purpose: to humiliate and discredit the sole juror who refused to deliver the verdict preferred by Clancy’s supporters.
https://x.com/mafiamasshole/status/2098603986257317895?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"Stop saying the lone Clancy juror lied on his form. There is no factual basis for that at this time. Under current Massachusetts law, you are disqualified if you are: a defendant in a pending felony case, or convicted of a felony within the past 7 years, or currently in the custody of a correctional institution. So if you were arrested but never charged, the case was dismissed, or you're currently charged only with a misdemeanor, that alone does not make you legally ineligible for jury service.... G.L. c. 234A, § 4. The lone juror has ONE 2021 case that was dismissed in 2021, 5 years before his jury service. A 209A or 258E restraining order is not a criminal conviction and is not listed as a jury disqualification. These issues can still come up during voir dire if they could affect impartiality, but that is a separate question from whether you are legally eligible to serve. Sources: G.L. c. 234A, §§ 4, 33, 67A; Mass. Superior Court Rule 6."
https://x.com/mattwalshblog/status/2098597258283393334?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"We’ve never seen anything like this before. A man was conscripted into jury duty by the government. He performed his civic duty and followed his conscience, refusing to acquit a woman who confessed to systematically executing her three children. The defense attorney immediately launched a public smear campaign against the juror. Soon several other jurors joined the campaign. Then the media. Even the defense attorney’s wife has joined. Now they’re doxxing the man, digging into his past, contacting his family, showing up at his house. All of this both to punish him for refusing to go with their program, and to pollute any future jury pool by making it clear that anyone who votes to convict Clancy will have their life destroyed. It’s truly one of the most outrageously evil things we’ve ever seen from the Left, and that’s saying something. A direct assault on the integrity of our justice system. They are burning down every boundary and standard in their path. And doing it all for the sake of a child murdering psychopath. Unfathomable."
2 comments:
The media hates truth and honor so they had anyone standing against the mob for justice.
They’re just publicity for the ASPL narrative of the moment.
Post a Comment