Obtuse Idiots Want To Set A Murderer Free

 https://x.com/robbystarbuck/status/2097517312593064198?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "Even the foreperson of the Lindsay Clancy jury admits that the 11 who wanted to vote not guilty by reason of insanity all knew she killed her kids and that she admits she killed her kids. They wanted to rule her not guilty by reason of insanity because people said she used to be a good Mom. They knew she killed her kids. Still wanted to let her off with an insanity ruling instead of holding her accountable like any other killer. Then they acted shocked that the lone holdout juror didn’t want to interact with them or listen to them. How have brains become this broken? She strangled her three kids. Strangled them. One by one. I can’t let this one go. It’s one of the most evil things you can do. I don’t care what set it off. She did the act. THREE TIMES. Every child killer deserves the death penalty, with exceptions for actual accidents of course. This was no accident. She did it. One by one. The insanity is not holding her accountable for it."

 

 

 https://x.com/endwokeness/status/2097509623288709361?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

" This just aired on CBS Boston: A female 4th juror comes forward and says the other jurors were pushing to acquit on *DAY 1* She changed from guilty to not guilty."

 https://x.com/msmelchen/status/2097620739994050647?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "I'm about two Clancy clips away from campaigning for the abolition of trial by jury."

 "I’m already there. Why Lee Kuan Yew abolished trial by jury:"

(Melissa Chen) 

 https://x.com/tomhfh/status/2060343652753224073

 "Lee Kuan Yew abolished trial by jury in Singapore after determining that it was too easy for defence lawyers to appeal to racial and religious biases of juries in multicultural Singapore. He writes in his memoirs how as a young lawyer he was able to get three clients acquitted who he was sure did commit murder. LKY writes that he "worked on the weaknesses of the jury -- their biases, their prejudices, their reluctance really to find four Muslims guilty of killing in cold blood or in a heat of great passion, religious passion, an RAF officer, his wife and child." He writes "The judge was thoroughly disgusted. I went home feeling quite sick because I knew I'd discharged my duty as required of me, but I knew I had done wrong.” Study after study shows that in multi ethnic societies, there is significant in-group bias on juries."

 https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2060321273733902816

 " NEW: Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad have been cleared over the alleged assault of a male police officer at Manchester Airport Two juries failed to reach a verdict and no further trial will take place."

 

For those who won't click the link, there is clear video showing the assault which juries failed to convict on.  

 https://x.com/younisjoseph/status/2097528169528271108?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "These juror's should've probably stayed quiet... Maybe, just maybe, when Lindsay Clancy's own defense attorney conceded that she killed her own children and yet the jurors still proceeded to question who did it the holdout juror thought "Yeah... this is completely incoherent, I think I am going to sit this one out""

 

 

 https://x.com/mattwalshblog/status/2097507709704614348?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it. One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.” Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t. Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question. Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing."

 

Well, Dan is an "obtuse idiot", he'd fit right in.  

 

"Calls are coming in for the judge in the Lindsay Clancy m*rder trial to hold open contempt hearings against the nurse jurors who admitted to using their own opinions about medications and toxicology findings to explain findings to other jurors and influence their decisions.

#court

Outrage erupted after three of the female jurors made the admission during an interview, saying that nurses on the jury were answering questions about the medications, and walking the panel through a South Shore Hospital report as well as a toxicology report.

Critics say this crossed the line, and violated the rules set in place by Judge Sullivan, who told them:

Jurors may not answer questions in the jury room with anything except the exhibits and evidence already admitted in court.

Any questions about the hospital report, toxicology report, medications, amounts, reactions, etc. should have been answered by the medical experts who testified under oath on the stand, and not fellow jurors.

If there were questions beyond what they felt they could answer via that testimony, a note should have been sent to the judge asking for clarification.

However, the nurses acted like unsworn experts then used their own interpretations to influence the panel and pressure the one hold-out juror to flip his vote to not guilty.

These are the nurses who:

Gushed over the performance of defense attorney Kevin Reddington,

Praised Reddington for his 'extreme compassion' for Clancy and for being 'really funny'

Said the prosecution was too harsh on a woman who k*lled her three kids by strangling them to de*th.

Attacked the lone holdout juror because he couldn't get over 'how viciously she k*lled her three kids

Accused the hold out juror of being arrogant because he didn't base his vote on their medical opinions.

Three jurors - foreperson Roni Carlson, fifth-grade special-needs teacher Paula Devlin; and Kellie Farina, a retired chef - talked about what happened in the jury room.

They said the 12-person jury of nine women and three men spent seven days, and more than 36 hours deadlocked 11-1. They wanted a finding that Clancy was not guilty, but one man would not join them.

The arguments inside the jury room were so loud that the alternate jurors thought they were fighting.

Because the juror would not change his vote, Carlson sent a note to Judge Sullivan accusing the hold out juror of not following the law.

Reddington even asked the judge to remove that juror."