https://x.com/ianmsc/status/2097692944824414348?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
One more thing that they said wasn't happening, and now Newsome is bragging about doing what they said didn't/couldn't happen.
https://x.com/thrillarilla369/status/2097438529030631548?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" This should make you angry. This is Bonnie Pierce, a 38-year-old mother of three from St. Paul, Minnesota. Her house caught fire. She and two of her children escaped, then realized her toddler was still inside. Bonnie went back in, found the child, but could not get out. She shielded the child with her body. She died from her burns. The child survived. A GoFundMe for her family raised about $42,000. By comparison, more than $1,000,000 was raised on GoFundMe for Lindsay Clancy, who was charged with killing her children. It is a sad reflection of the society we have become. RIP Bonnie."
How messed up is the ASPL that they cheer and fund raise for murderer, and ignore a hero?
https://x.com/jonathanhatami/status/2097699298414674257?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" Regarding some of the Clancy juror interviews: -Good, normal, reasonable people need to stop trying to get out of jury service. Please. -The CW needs more training on jury selection in child homicide cases. -In child homicide cases, the most important thing is the facts & evidence surrounding the homicide. It’s not an afterthought. And, I’ll be professional, like I always am, but I’m showing compassion and empathy for the child victim, NOT the murderer. This is getting ridiculous. -If you strangle your three children to death you are not a “good” mom and clearly don’t “love” your children. I don’t care about past acts - good or bad. And, just so we are all clear, child abuse usually happens behind closed doors, not in public. Just because we don’t have witnesses to say you are a “bad” mom doesn’t mean you are a “good” mom. -Our society is not in a good place when people are getting “excited,” smiling, cheering, taking videos & selfies and rallying and cheering around a person who strangled her three children to death. The victims & the crime have become an afterthought to some people. That is incredibly sad. -This isn’t about gender. My wife is my best friend. She’s an awesome mom, wife and detective. I work with so many awesome female child abuse and homicide detectives. This is about humanity. It’s not okay, understandable, allowed, excused, justified or relatable to kill your children no matter what you are going through. The government has the responsibility to keep us safe. But a parent’s duty to protect their child is the highest duty. They are ultimately responsible and accountable if they kill their child. -Can people just stop hurting children!"
https://x.com/mabbe_8/status/2097662738436640954?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" It may be time to have a serious conversation about professional jurors. Listening to the three female boomers from the Lindsay Clancy jury explain their reasoning after the mistrial is disturbing, not because they reached a conclusion I disagree with, but because of how they say they got there. “She loved her children, so she had to have snapped.” “There were no witnesses saying Lindsay was a bad mother.” “The prosecution didn’t show enough compassion.” The prosecution was “harsh.” Reddington was “funny” and “entertaining.” None of that is the legal standard they were instructed to apply. Nobody disputed that Lindsay loved her children or that she suffered from mental illness. Nobody was asking the jury to decide if she was a good mother, whether the prosecutors were compassionate enough, or which lawyer they enjoyed watching more. The question was criminal responsibility: Did her mental illness leave her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct or conform her conduct to the requirements of law? That question had to be decided from the evidence, including her behavior before, during and after the killings, the medical evidence, and the expert testimony. Instead, we're now hearing the female boomer jurors describe reasoning rooted in compassion, motherhood, likability and emotion. "She was a loving mother, therefore she must have snapped" isn't a legal standard. It's an emotional inference. Jurors are absolutely entitled to find reasonable doubt, but they're not entitled to replace the judge's instructions with their own definition of justice. If jurors can't separate what feels right from what the law requires, maybe it's time to seriously debate professional juries. Because three children deserved a verdict based on the evidence and the law, not which side made the jury feel better."
https://x.com/joeconchatv/status/2097367093192618420?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
No comments:
Post a Comment