https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/2115109/rotherhams-collaborators/
I wrote a bit yesterday about the "Grooming" rings rampant in England. First, from here on out they will be referred to as rape rings as that is more accurate. Second, this has been known and ignored by the UK government since 1997. How in the literal hell is this possible in a 20th/21st century western European country?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/22/rochdale-grooming-ring-abusers-not-yet-deported/
"A convicted Rochdale grooming gang ringleader is still living in the
city where he abused children, nearly nine years after he was ordered to be deported.
Qari Abdul Rauf, 54, was part of a nine-strong gang of Asian men convicted of sex offences against vulnerable girls in 2012.
Up to 47 girls as young as 12 were plied with alcohol and drugs and gang-raped in Rochdale during a two-year reign of terror.
Rauf was jailed for six years but released in November 2014 after serving two years and six months of his sentence.
Theresa May, the then home secretary, ordered him to be sent back to Pakistan as it would be “conducive to the public good”.
Rauf and fellow gang leader Adil Khan, who got a 13-year-old girl pregnant, fought their deportation orders.
They
lost a lengthy battle in 2018 but later launched another case,
insisting the order breached their human rights as they both had wives
and children in the UK. Their appeals were rejected.
But nearly nine years later, Rauf remains in Rochdale, where his victims are forced to live alongside him."
So, this guy is convicted of child rape, gets out early, and now lives in freedom 9 years after he was ordered to be deported? I get that Pakistan doesn't want him back, but why let him out of jail? Why the light sentence (6 years) for raping at least 47 girls? Why aren't people like Dan and the rest of the pro Islam/pro Hamas folx screaming about this? Is it because "love is live", or "MAPS are just one more sexual expression."? It's unlikely we'll ever really know. Maybe it's because the MSM (you know, the real journalists) aren't reporting on this story.
https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-cousin-marriages-create-high-risk-of-genetic-disorders/a-60687452#:~:text=Scientists%20say%20inbreeding%20is%20causing%20an%20unusually%20high,of%20consanguineous%20marriages.%20Still%2C%20this%20social%20custom%20persists.
The vast majority of the perpetrators of these rape rings are Pakistani and I saw a piece that explains some possible reasons why their inbreeding plays a role in their normalization of raping young, non Muslim, girls. The premise of the piece is that the inbreeding leads to the overwhelming importance of the clan to Pakistanis and this leads to the attitude that anyone outside of the clan has little or no value. If I can find it, I'll post a link.
https://x.com/jonatanpallesen/status/1874783967519326305
"A central aspect that is important to understand regarding the Pakistani child-rape gangs:
Pakistan is the most inbred country in the entire world.
You can go all your life here in Denmark without meeting a child born to close relatives. In Pakistan it's above 60%.
This is completely different worlds in a fundamental way. Inbreeding gives rise to mental problems and disorders due to harmful recessive variants. But the problem goes deeper than that.
Inbreeding permeates the culture in Pakistan, and has done so for countless generations, spanning into the distant past. This has shaped a society centered around kinship ties, around family and honour. This is deeply different from the more atomized, personalized societies of the modern West.
The society in Pakistan is more fractured into a number of patrilineages with a strong sense of internal loyalty. This creates a threat to those outside the lineages - the more distant, the larger the threat. But their society is also resilient to this threat. The patrilineage clans are strong protectors. They watch out for the weak and vulnerable within them to a degree that is foreign to North-Western Europeans. (Less so to for example people from southern Europe or Southern U.S.)
Their 12 year old girls would not walk out alone at the mercy of hostile clans. They would be watched over and protected by their family. If someone hurt a vulnerable girl from their clan, they would take violent revenge.
This cultural system has co-evolved with inbreeding. Inbreeding helps bring the clans much tighter together. Inbreeding ensures that family ties and allegiances stay within clans to a much higher degree, especially over time. There is also an evolutionary genetic aspect: If you share a larger part of your genome with your cousin, your genetic interest will be more closely aligned.
If you look at many of the convicted Pakistani child gang-rapists, a pattern you notice is that the gangs are often centered around close relatives such as cousins or brothers. See for example this clip: https://x.com/alexmaccaroon/status/1874579217259893047. Here we have three brothers: Sangeer Hussein, Arshid Hussein and Basharat Hussein, organizing child gang rapes and torture together. In the clip the Pakistani child rapist also blames the girls for what they were wearing, and stresses the fact that they are allowed to go out on their own. The Northern European culture is as alien to him as his is to us. He cannot comprehend a culture that would not watch over its young girls at all, and even let them tempt strangers in this way.
Now, given this knowledge, what is the very most reckless thing you can do? It is to take millions of people from the most inbred, clan-based culture in the world and insert them into a personal freedom-focused Western culture, without taking any precautions.
The Pakistani culture understands the threat, it can handle the threat. The Northern European culture is not prepared for the threat, at all. It hardly even understands the threat. Even after reading about thousands of accounts of child gang-rapes, the Northern European still doesn't comprehend. It's alien to them, surreal. They on a fundamental level do not understand, and do not understand how to deal. That's why we can read about deranged things, such as a British father being arrested by the police when he attempted to rescue his daughter from a rape den. Or about the child gang-rape victims some years later seeing their Pakistani-born abusers in the local supermarket, walking around with a new female child victim.
If we had any sense of the deep differences between peoples of the world, we would know that this spells disaster. But regrettably, the modern Western world has memed (and shamed) itself into thinking that all peoples are identical.
Such deep mistakes in understanding of the world can come with an enormous price for socities and for victims. Such as the years of repeated gang-rapes and torment for vulnerable 12 year old girls."
Note the section in bold.
While I agree that the protection of the vulnerable is an admirable trait, the dismissal of the protection for anyone outside of the clan seems barbaric.
