https://x.com/nldrmedia/status/1998861580407288256?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Great example of how awesome some of these Somali immigrants are.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09726-0
Woopsie, I guess following the science doesn't help the greens extremists.
"NATURE JOURNAL RETRACTS MAJOR CLIMATE STUDY THAT CLAIMED $38 TRILLION IN ANNUAL DAMAGE BY 2049 The "science" strikes again. Nature has retracted a highly publicized 2024 climate study from Germany's Potsdam Institute that projected climate change would cause $38 trillion in economic damage annually by 2049 and a 62% reduction in global GDP by 2100. Progressives hyped it relentlessly. Axios called it a study that "shines a new light on the patterns and severity of climate change's economic impacts." It was used to justify electric vehicle mandates and other costly government interventions. One problem: the study was garbage. Scientists found rows of data were "wrongly printed as a decimal, rather than a percentage point." When corrected for statistical uncertainty, the results became "statistically insignificant." And here's the kicker: the entire projection was driven by data anomalies from one country, Uzbekistan, where economic data from 1995-1999 was inaccurate. Remove Uzbekistan, fix the math errors, and suddenly the economic harm from climate change is no longer distinguishable from the costs of doing nothing. The Network for Greening the Financial System, a group of central banks including the Federal Reserve, had already incorporated this junk study into their climate stress tests. The Fed withdrew from that network in January. Why didn't peer reviewers catch obvious errors? Conformity bias. Nobody wanted to question findings that supported the narrative. This is why Americans don't trust climate "science." Source: Wall Street Journal / Nature"
https://x.com/alphanews/status/1998860940196892830?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
The more you know.
3 comments:
1st two links are to the same punk pretending ICE agents quake in fear of him. I would suspect the second link is supposed to for the fake climate fear mongering story.
As to the first, that video alone should be enough to jail him, and if not an actual citizen, to deport him immediately with a dire warning against returning. If he should suffer some mysterious bruising and blood loss during his detainment, that would be a shame. He's proved himself unworthy of breathing our air.
The climate change story is fantastic. It relates what normal, truly rationally people already knew about the fear mongering of the climate alarmists. Seems someone should face jail time for spreading that bullshit like butter.
The third piece refers to an issue I doubt too many believe is non-existent. To what extent it does is now more certain with whistle blowers exposing the rot the progressive left brought about for non-assimilating muslim Somalis to exploit. I've no doubt they're not the only people who are exploiting these "loopholes", but that they exist so easily exposed for abuse is just evidence of the stupidity of electing progressives to public office.
Fixed #2.
I know, free speech and all, but this is crazy.
The climate change narrative keeps crumbling, yet some folx cling to the hope of disaster.
There are more and more examples of significant problems that come from the suicidal empathy peddled by the DFL. Yet the folx who benefit from these programs or enrich themselves through fraud will keep voting for it.
It's strange how committed Dan is to the "peer review" process when we continue to see so much evidence of the abject failure of the system over the last few decades. From research that is completely made up and fabricated, to research based on interviewing ONE person and filtered through some bizarre framework, it's reasonable to be skeptical of much of what passes for "peer reviewed" these days.
UNLESS, that "peer reviewed" work doesn't align with Dan's political convictions. Then it can be ignored.
Post a Comment