Saturday, February 27, 2021

Children

 In a thread a while back, I tried to get an answer to various questions regarding the "transitioning" of children.   Unsurprisingly I was unable to get a clear and direct answer, nor was there even any acknowledgement of the fact that children are being encouraged, pressured, or coerced into "transitioning" because they (at some point) fall outside of traditional gender stereotypes.   For example, a "tomboy" being told that she's really "trans", not that it's normal for girls to enjoy things that have been stereotyped as "boy activities"

The purpose of this post is to compile examples of this phenomenon, here are a few to start with.  

 

https://archive.is/qqIXL

  https://archive.is/LLPQ1

 https://www.thecollegefix.com/author-of-transgender-craze-seducing-our-daughters-offers-parents-advice-on-how-to-protect-their-girls/

 https://www.newsweek.com/we-need-balance-when-it-comes-gender-dysphoric-kids-i-would-know-opinion-1567277


https://winteryknight.com/2020/03/12/canadian-court-rules-that-child-can-change-genders-without-parental-consent/

Friday, February 26, 2021

Remember when

 Remember when gas was 30-40 cents per gallon cheaper than it is now?

Remember back in December when all we heard was if we'd elect the right senators in the GA run off, that we'd have a COVID stimulus ready for Biden on his first day in office?

Remember when people "desperately" needed a $2,000 stimulus check?

Remember when people "desperately" needed $2000/month?

Remember when we weren't bombing Syria?

Yeah, those were good times.  


But at least we fixed that damn sexist plastic potato, made the world safe again. 

Thursday, February 25, 2021

R.I.P

Poor Mrs Potato head, she was much too young to die.  

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Scale

 To me this seems like common sense, but maybe I'm in the minority.   


It seems like one of the most important factors in solving a problem, and in prioritizing which problems should be addressed in what order, is to accurately determine the actual scope of the problem.   


For example if one group of people believed that problem X had occurred significantly more often that the data indicated, then wouldn't it make sense to deal with the actual scope of the problem, than with the exaggerated scope of the perceived problem?

If nothing else is resources are allocated to a problem based on perception, rather than data, doesn't it make sense that those resources could be used more effectively elsewhere?    In effect aren't we taking resources that could be allocated to solve the actual scope of problem B and using them on the perceived scope of problem A?    Doesn't that mean that victims of problem B might suffer because of resources being spent on the perceived scope of problem A?

In all this talk of unity, wouldn't it make sense to start by unifying around the actual scope of problems?

Tuesday, February 16, 2021

What if the experts don't agre with the narrative

https://www.vox.com/2021/2/15/22280763/kids-covid-vaccine-teachers-unions-schools-reopening-cdc

 

A couple of months ago there was a bit of a stir when a leader of the Chicago teacher's union tweeted about how it was unsafe for teachers to go back into the classrooms, while she was on a beach in the Caribbean.   Some folks thought this was hypocritical, others just ignored it.  

Most of the teachers I personally know, would like to get back to teaching in person.  They're sick of the hassles, and miss their students.  They're pretty confident that they can safely teach in their classrooms.   Yet, some teachers unions seem to be resistant to reopening schools.  Despite the sciencey folks saying that it's workable,  and the fact that it's actually being done successfully in some places.   One wonders why that is.   But I think the above article makes some good points, and raises some worthwhile questions.   

On a related note.  I overheard a teacher friend saying that they were ending school year early because the state had "waived some requirements.  It makes me wonder why these things were "requirements" if they could be waived.  It also makes me wonder how many of those "requirements" actually benefit our kids and their education. 

One thing that I sincerely hope comes out of the events related to COVID is a serious discussion about how we do education, and how we can do a better job in the future. 

Monday, February 15, 2021

To all the fools

 To all the idiots who've been touting the wonders of wind and solar as long term replacements for fossil fuels or nuclear, thank you so very much from the millions of people living in actual physical danger from the recent cool weather.   While wind turbines look like green renewable energy, it's amusing to watch the petroleum powered helicopter, spewing carbon into the air, to spray de icer on the blades.    This ignores the fact that wind farms don't have the capability to store electricity for emergencies, and if they did it would involve batteries which contain all sorts of nasty things.    It'd be amusing to watch the bird carnage spawned by these things, if it wasn't so sad and disgusting.   How about those solar panels?  Not so effective when they're covered with show and there's no sunshine.  


The bottom line, at this point, is that all y'all who've been advocating for "renewable", wind and solar, need to be begging forgiveness from the millions of people who are literally at risk of freezing themselves, as well as massive damage to their homes.   Well played, greens, well played. 

Friday, February 12, 2021

Unity

 I was glancing through Dan's screed on unity, and I find myself torn.   I find his characterization of Trump as an abuser, over the top and pointless.   But, I will grant his point that it's time to move on from trump and move forward into something.   

Where I struggle is the assumption that the only option is to unify around Biden.  In his short time in office Biden has done nothing that would encourage any principled conservative to support him.   It's strange how, during the waning days of the campaign, we kept hearing the horror stories about the people who would be devastated because they didn't get a $2,000 check.  Yet, despite hearing how easy it would be, there's been virtually nothing done to help those desperate people.  

So, while I am excited for the conservative movement to move of from Trump, and towards a future where our candidate isn't a 78 year old whit guy.    What I'm not excited about is being told that the only way to achieve unity is to uncritically support Biden. 

Political CYA

https://winteryknight.com/2021/02/12/new-york-democrats-admit-they-covered-up-15000-deaths-caused-by-their-decisions/



Cuomo and anyone else involved in this should be removed from office immediately, prosecuted if possible, and sued by every surviving family member.   If this is what liberals mean by compassion, then I think I'll pass. 

Thursday, February 11, 2021

Interesting, I wouldn't have expected it this soon.

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/ 


Time magazine, surely a bastion of right wing orthodoxy, ran the above article under the headline "The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election".   What's interesting is the implication in the headline that this "Shadow Campaign" was necessary to "save" us from the possibility of Trump winning.   I'm not sure that this is the smoking gun that many of the Trump zealots wanted, but it's clearly an indication that those who opposed Trump were open to anything no matter how unseemly that would "save" the election.




Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Who'd have thunk?

https://winteryknight.com/2021/02/08/crime-rates-up-after-democrats-sided-with-blm-and-antifa-against-police/

https://news.yahoo.com/amphtml/twin-cities-rocked-uptick-serious-133710796.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS91cmw_c2E9dCZyY3Q9aiZxPSZlc3JjPXMmc291cmNlPXdlYiZjZD0mdmVkPTJhaFVLRXdpUXU1cTA4OV91QWhXTVpzMEtIUXJRQnlNUUZqQURlZ1FJQVJBQyZ1cmw9aHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZuZXdzLnlhaG9vLmNvbSUyRmFtcGh0bWwlMkZ0d2luLWNpdGllcy1yb2NrZWQtdXB0aWNrLXNlcmlvdXMtMTMzNzEwNzk2Lmh0bWwmdXNnPUFPdlZhdzAxZEw4MDFvTnBOOXNVcUM4T1h2TUg&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEtYYO8xNvryaQcMLF_OCZyQksJFvoBtCFL0O7o-BuwI2mzHjn2tljs_89Hw7vyf0oUcjghEkkIVnmqcmC177fkbvgbXRywCdlI0MFsHvxbC-Hca1fWp31KQUbnlROt0D0eiGoby3zcYcRkKyFDKNjx6T9-GRISU2CuKStOkUxDU




This is a lot of unanswered questions.

"IF you’re so big on local decision making, then you shouldn’t have a problem if Roe is overturned. You shouldn’t be against local governments expecting all medical facilities to meet some minimal standards. You shouldn’t have a problem with all our patient medical facilities being expected to have admitting privileges at hospitals. Do you support those common sense measures?"

"Are you referring to Biden’s attempt to allow biological males unfettered access to bathrooms and locker rooms which have previously been reserved for biological females?"

 

I'll grant that you attempted to answer the questions above, although you simply did not answer the question as asked.  You essentially, said that you only support local decisions as long as they agree with your political views.  Clearly, the fact that you had to qualify your response, instead of simply address the items asked about, indicates that your support of local decisions is not as unlimited as you claim.  If it was, then you'd support the repeal of Roe.  

"In what sense? Do I support the family in deciding where to seek pre natal care? Yes. Do I support the father of the child having an equal say in decisions about the child he's fathered? Yes. Do I support underage children having elective surgery without parental consent? No. Do I support the decision of "the family" to end the existence of the life of a unique human being based on what's convenient?"

 

 "Do you support that "higher authority", addressing the harm to one group, by choosing to inflict harm on another group?"

 

" Do you understand that by giving biological makes the choice to use whatever restroom or locker room they choose based on how they feel, that you are removing the choice from biological women/girls to feel uncomfortable changing or showering with biological males? Can you explain specifically why the "rights" of an incredibly small group of biological males override the privacy rights of women/girls?"

 

" In the case of the 2020 violence, do you realize that you have now placed the blame on the local governments of the Twin Cities, Seattle, Portland, Louisville, ATL, DC, etc., all of which are (and have been for decades controlled by the political left?"

 " Why are you so obsessed with this being decided at the federal level, NOT at the state or local governments you claim to be so enamored with?"


"1. Doesn’t the fact that you have to add a qualifier to the term woman simply point out the reality that biological men aren’t women?

2. Are you suggesting that scientific disciplines such as biology and forensic medicine are not science?"

 

" If by society, you mean the governmental entities that control the city/state/country where the oppression is occurring, then why wouldn't you be all for wholesale replacement of those in power who are actually doing the "oppressing"?"

 

" Please provide one actual example where police simply walked up to "peaceful protesters" and started shooting rubber bullets at them with absolutely zero provocation."

 

 "Really? Are you sure you want to stick with this hunch of yours?"

 

 "Can you explain specifically why the "rights" of an incredibly small group of biological males override the privacy rights of women/girls?"

 

 "re these experts really suggesting that biological men who have undergone extensive alterations in their quest to appear to be women, are 100% indistinguishable form biological women? Are they suggesting that the forensic science that can identify bodies years after death, will identify these biological males as females"

 "If you show a podiatrist the x-rays of the foot of a biological male, and a biological female, the podiatrist would likely be able to differentiate between the two with a 90+% degree of accuracy, does that medical expertise help prove your hunch?"

"If a surgically altered biological male, and a surgically unaltered biological female were both being treated for the same form of cancer, would a medical expert give them the same dosages of the same medicines?"

"How many medical professionals would diagnose a surgically altered biological male with cervical cancer?"

"Would a medical professional be able to distinguish between a surgically altered biological male, and a biological female using objective testing? (X-rays. blood work, etc)"

 

 "You still haven't explained why you think the metaphysical is more real and reliable than the physical?"

 

" The question then is, which is the more reliable metric. The physical or the metaphysical? Do we really posses enough understanding of the human mind to say with confidence that what we think is more real than what we are?"

" The bigger problem is that this whole notion clashes with those who believe in a materialist/Darwinian worldview. If one accepts that the "mind is a computer made of meat", or that matter is all that there is, then how does one diminish the material in favor of the immaterial?"

 

" One has to wonder why, if those differences in the physical, material, biological, body are so insignificant why so much effort is expended to remove or alter them?"

" The question is then raised, what makes something a "female body part"?"

"For example does skin, a nipple, and a bag of silicone actually become a breast? Or does an actual breast require all of the component parts of a breast?"

"Does surgically removing the penis, cutting a "hole" in the body, and refashioning part of the penis into something that gives sensations similar to a clitoris, turn into an actual fully functioning vagina, or is it a less capable substitute?"

"Are things like bones, brains, muscles, lungs, DNA and chromosomes considered "body parts"?"

 " Where, (quote and link required), have I ever made a scripture bared argument in this thread? Or anywhere else for that matter?"

" Why would I ask people about your claims?"

 "Why wouldn’t the burden of proof be on you for claims you’ve made?"

 " Why wouldn’t the burden of proof be on you for claims you’ve made?'

" At what age is a person mentally, emotionally, and physically at the point to determine if they are prepared to make permanent surgical and biological alterations to their body?"

"If a trans women (presenting as a man)has cancer, should the oncologist prescribe the dosages intended for a male?"

" You realize that you’re arguing for the elimination of women as a unique biological and legal category, don’t you?"

"That these laws being imposed on the 98.58% (I know you claimed that nothing was being imposed on anyone) actually render the current protected classes of women and homosexuals meaningless, don’t you?"

"One of the proudest achievements of the political left had been Title 9 and the positive affect it’s had in women in sports and education. Well, if you can’t identify what a woman is, how does one extend legal protection to that which can’t be identified?"

" Do you realize that your "question" is essentially an unproven claim of fact, disguised as a question?"

" Are you suggesting that it is "WRONG/IMMORAL/UNJUST" to imprison ANY consenting adult for ANY sexual activities, or for "falling in love" with ANY other adult who reciprocates their feelings?"

" Are you suggesting that you know better then the experts?"

" Do you realize that the Bible DOES specifically condemn stealing? Do you realize that you have argued that there are cases in which stealing is appropriate? Are you saying that IF the Bible DID specifically condemn "being a transgender person" or "gay folks getting married", that you would change your position and align your position with what the Bible said? Does this mean that you align your position on issues 100% with the Bible when it contains clear, direct, unambiguous condemnation of behaviors or actions?"

" Do you believe that God encourages (applauds/blesses/allows/cheers on/approves of) either of those?"

" Are you seriously suggesting that cutting of perfectly functioning body parts and replacing them with semi functional facsimiles is not self mutilation?"

 " Are you seriously suggesting that cutting of perfectly functioning body parts and replacing them with semi functional facsimiles is not self mutilation?"

" If a woman (after “transitioning to a man) was admitted to a hospital (checked female on the admitted documents), is the hospital required to give “her” the drug dosages for a female or for a male? If it’s the female dosage, is the hospital liable for malpractice?"

" Hell, there’s a worldwide organization dedicated to furthering gay statutory rape, but no harm done there, right?"

" Are you seriously saying that an 8 year old had the ability to make an informed decision about undergoing medical procedure that will take years, make irreparable changes to their bodies, and make them even more different?"

" Do you agree with Biden? Do you think that an 8 year old has the capacity to make an informed decision on a medical procedure of this magnitude? What other medical procedures are 8 year olds capable of informed consent to undergo?"

"Which raises the question. If a woman undergoes extensive surgery to fashion her vagina into something that resembles a penis, does it magically become (on a cellular level) a fully functioning penis, indistinguishable form the penis on a male?"

"If it’s not all about penises, why is surgical alteration necessary?"


"FYI, if sex and gender are unrelated, then what scientific principle declares that “gender” is infallibly correct?"

" What harm did I ever claim there was?"

 "Are the Bison and penguins involved in loving monogamous relationships, or are they promiscuous?"

"Wouldn’t that mean that only promiscuous homosexual sex is good?"


"Of course, the implication in this I’d that penguins and humans are morally equal, how do you prove that?"