https://x.com/jonatanpallesen/status/1875253382992085163?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/dec/15/child-sexual-abuse-gangs-white-men-home-office-report
There is so much wrong with this. Most obviously that a UK newspaper is blatantly trying to mislead people as to the nature of the rape ring problem in the UK. Of course the notion that there are a significant number of "sexual abuse gangs", regardless of their ethnic background, doesn't seem to be a big concern at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWP9LxnYmy4
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1875054148489732250?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
UK police asking if a 5 year old had consented to sexual abuse. What in the hell is going on in the UK?
https://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/your-rotherham/girl-by-age-of-16-id-slept-with-100-asian-men-court-told-4323693
1. Nice victim blaming by the Rotherham Advisor.
2. Nice job trying to hide the fact that the Asian men were Pakistani.
https://x.com/msmelchen/status/1875229883044901288?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
For whatever reason Musk has jumped on this rape ring story and has been writing and forwarding relevant tweets on the story. Yet somehow, the thing that has certain brits pissed off is that Musk is exerting pressure on the UK to deal with the problem, not that there is a decades long history of Pakistani men raping young girls and getting away with it.
https://x.com/msmelchen/status/1875229883044901288?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/astor_charlie/status/1874924677820461073?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
If I was one of the victims, I'd be suing the UK government, the Labour party, the MP's and officials personally, and the media for how this has been handled.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/zakir-naik-courts-fresh-controversy-says-rape-murder-accused-can-be-forgiven-if-/articleshow/114119663.cms?from=mdr
I though that we'd gotten past the "she was wearing..." defense.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1874668504835817491?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/msmelchen/status/1874945562912670024?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://winteryknight.com/2025/01/07/how-the-uks-secular-left-government-covered-up-sex-trafficking-of-children/
8 comments:
I haven't read any of the links, yet, but I just wanted to note how the situation in the UK is just a step or two beyond our own. The "progressive" left in this country is not much different, though I believe our Constitution still prevents them from pushing us over the cliff as they did the UK. They're cancelling of opposing views is far more aggressive than it is here, with some people being arrested for praying silently in front of their abortion mills. Silently. As in, not speaking out loud. It is only the honesty of the praying person which can indict said person.
Anyway, the language issue ("asian" instead of "Pakistani") is no different from prohibiting terms like "illegal alien" here, or never identifying a non-white perpetrator of a crime as a non-white person, nor printing a suspect's name if it is muslim or in any way foreign.
And of course, what Tommy Robinson has reported illustrates the width and breath of the UK government turpitude, which seems to extend from the federal down to the local level.
I agree that the difference in legal/constitutional systems will help to some degree. But the push from the left to cancel anyone who addresses these issues honestly and the refusal to properly vet immigrants will (likely) place us in a similar situation at some point. And folx like Dan will whine about Islamophobia as being the bigger problem than rape. Just like the UK.
Technically Pakistanis are Asian, so it's an excellent example of using a term that is technically accurate, to obfuscate the Truth. Yet somehow the Dans of the world revere these paragons of journalistic integrity.
Yeah, the UK government bears significant responsibility for this problem continuing as long as it has and to the degree that it has.
The whole thing started because no one wanted to be considered racist when saying who was doing the raping. 23 years!!!!
https://patriotpost.us/articles/113229-uks-migrant-grooming-gangs-and-the-ensuing-outrage-2025-01-06
https://gellerreport.com/2025/01/its-only-taken-23-years.html/
Glenn,
Because obviously it's worse to be racist than it it to facilitate 23 years of raping children.
What I find most troubling is the complete refusal of anyone in power in the UK to simply acknowledge that this was wrong and that they're going to fix the problem.
Absolutely, Glenn. We see it here as well.
Craig...what I find troubling is this refusal to not give a flying rat's behind over how a people...in this case, Pakistanis...would respond for exposing the worst among them as the scum they are. To have their religious leaders organize protests against those who seek to inform the people of what's going on, and then knuckle under to those religious leaders, is rank cowardice of the progressive leftist kind. I can't imagine allowing, say, a Polish leader in my country whining about discrimination against Poles after someone exposed criminality by or from within the Polish community. I'd speak out against such a person daring to do so in my name and so fraudulently.
Art, I agree that it's troubling that there is no one in the UK Muslim/Pakistani community that is acknowledging how bad this is. If the broader Muslim community in the west is going to have any legitimacy they would need to vocally support assimilation and condemn those who engage in these sorts of behavior.
What I think might be worse is that the global left wing is either silent or quietly supportive of the rapists, and while condemning Israel for defending itself, refuses to condemn this sort of behavior in the various cultures that practice it.
Craig,
So long as this disparity exists, I cannot see that denying muslims entry into our country isn't the best policy. Again, it's sad for those who don't adhere to the cultural evils of the muslim world, but it is not for us to risk our own in order to welcome in those who might only be faking it in order to gain a foothold here, much like the birthright citizen people. I really don't care how the world, or our own "progressive" imbeciles, view us for daring to protect ourselves from a culture anathema to ours.
I understand that you hold that position. I don't begrudge your position, nor am I trying to suggest that you should change that position. I find that your position has various factors that concern me and therefore I cannot agree with your position. That you "cannot see" or "believe" something is not convincing.
Good, because I'm not basing anything on how people see us. I'm concerned that we don't discard things that have made US culture great (innocent until proven guilty, guilt by association, personal responsibility, and the like) permanently in order to solve a temporary issue. I'd rather not waste bandwidth on implementing a simplistic policy that will likely not be implemented for years, when we could focus on factors that provide more immediate relief.
My point being, that in the absence of some really compelling evidence (more than "I believe" and "cannot see", I see no reason to accept your "Muslim ban" blindly.
Post a Comment