https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2090492515254157767?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"Liberal women will jump in front of ICE agents to stop illegals from being deported, tear down the country so they can keep killing unborn babies, and show up in droves to support a woman who strangled her kids to death and the media will keep telling us that "young white men" are actually the ones becoming radicalized in our society."
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2090428303970562133
"Lindsay Clancy brutally strangled her 3 kids to death Current scene outside the courthouse:"
Watch the video.
https://x.com/wil_da_beast630/status/2090623493935165677?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
" I mean, reading through the case record, what specifically happened is that Clancy lied to her husband, told him she was fine, and sent him out on an errand that took enough time for her to brutally murder all of the kids. He was THERE and supportive at the start of this time. A talented nanny/au par was literally on call, had he not been. This woman had a talk therapist and a prescribing psychiatrist. This is one of the least sympathetic perps I have ever seen. Millions of women are, for some insane reason, simply operating from the starting premise that her actions must somehow be the fault of an Evil Man."
https://x.com/nettermike/status/2090475949967962554?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"Where are all of the feminists NOW?!?!?! A California Islamic scholar just declared that women captured in war become slaves who can be s*xually used because the Quran makes it “halal.” Uthman ibn Farooq, based in San Diego, has taught that intimacy with female prisoners of war is not adultery or sin because Allah made it lawful. The UK banned him from entering the country in 2025 over exactly these views. In the video he calmly explains the classical rule: captives become property and s*xual access is permitted. This is not an isolated fringe rant. Similar radical statements keep surfacing. Preachers and online voices continue to cite the same doctrine to justify taking non-Muslim women as s*x slaves during conflict. Recent calls have even targeted specific communities. The pattern is clear and documented across classical texts and modern extremists. America cannot pretend this teaching is harmless or theoretical. When scholars in California openly promote s*xual slavery of captives as religiously approved, it demands attention and rejection. This ideology has no place here."
The outcry of liberal women in support of a woman who brutally killed three of her own children is almost drowned out by their silence on the role that women play in Islamic society as they overwhelmingly vote for Muslim candidates.
5 comments:
I've been seeing videos by a guy named Harris Sultan...a former muslim...who presents a host of muslim "clerics" and others expressing vitriolic threats, as well as how they intend to conquer western nations. They're well into these plans in most every western nation including our own, and somehow, we're wrong to deny them entry on the "they're not all bad" principle, without any means of any kind to determine whether that's true of any of them. We are free to allow whom we want...high skilled people for whom we might have need to fill various positions...but only after these select individuals pass a grueling vetting process to assure against Trojan horses.
There are plenty of people who are broadcasting these sorts of plans, yet the Dans of the world choose to ignore reality.
Obviously not 100% of Muslims are 100% bad, the problem is that the less bad ones won’t do anything to stop the bad ones or secretly support them.
Also obviously, our immigration policy should prioritize need in the US and genuine refugees before even considering anyone else.
Hey Shithead, if you’re going to unload a rage‑soaked screed on the internet, at least try to anchor it to something resembling verifiable reality instead of the fever‑dream mashup you posted. Your entire argument collapses the Lindsay Clancy case, women in general, Islam, terrorism, political ideology, and judicial procedure into one giant slurry of emotional outrage that has almost nothing to do with actual facts. The Clancy case is a documented medical‑legal dispute about postpartum psychosis, supported by psychiatric evaluations, medication records, and clinical deterioration noted by multiple professionals. It is not a feminist cult ritual, it is not a leftist plot, and it is not evidence that “women fawn over murderers.” The GoFundMe you’re ranting about was created for her extended family, not as a trophy for homicide, and the donors explicitly stated they were supporting the surviving relatives, not endorsing the killings. Hybristophilia is a rare paraphilia studied in forensic psychology, not a universal female instinct, and criminological research does not support your cartoonish claim that women are “notorious” for supporting violent criminals. You’re repeating a myth, not a fact.
Your attempt to rope Islam into this mess is even more detached from reality. Islam is a global religion with 1.8 billion adherents, the vast majority of whom are not terrorists, not extremists, and not connected to Hamas, ISIS, Al‑Qaeda, or any other violent extremist organization. Those groups are responsible for severe harm, loss of life, and human rights violations, but they do not represent Islam as a whole. Obama’s “workplace violence” classification of the Fort Hood shooting was a bureaucratic designation tied to military benefits and internal policy, not a moral endorsement of the attack. And your claim that “the left” defended or minimized the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre is simply false. The overwhelming majority of Americans across the political spectrum condemned the attack. A fringe of activists expressed extreme views, but fringe activists do not define an entire political ideology any more than extremists define an entire religion.
Your rant about “mostly Democrat women judges releasing violent criminals” is pure fiction. Judicial release decisions follow statutory guidelines, risk assessments, bail statutes, and case law. Gender and party affiliation are not predictive factors in release decisions, and no credible legal study supports your claim. You’re inventing a pattern because it fits your anger, not because it exists. And your attempt to tie all of this together into some grand narrative about national danger is nothing more than emotional projection dressed up as political analysis. You’re not identifying a real threat, you’re venting your own frustration and calling it insight.
What do you know? This is the same troll's comment which appeared at MY blog! Who do we know who posts the same comment at multiple blogs?
Yeah, I thought I aborted this in moderation, but must not have.
It's just a typical left wing screed, nothing new or creative.
What's hilarious is that even the "moderate" Muslims are perfectly OK with oppressing women to some degree. That the "vast majority" of Muslims don;t left a finger to stop the "terrorists" or "extremists", seems to be the biggest problem with Islam which gets ignored.
He also ignores the recent research which seems to suggest that liberal women have a far higher incidence of mental illness.
Post a Comment