France is literally on fire. Centuries old buildings are being destroyed. Innocent people are being attacked and businesses destroyed. It’s incredibly obvious what worldview is driving this rampage.
Hitler did less damage to the historic buildings of France than these mobs. Think about that, Adolph Hitler was more concerned about protecting the history and architectural of France than the thugs.
Yet the ASPL says nothing. Dan’s blog and FB don’t even have a cursory mention of this violent uprising. While the ASPL, the DFL, and the DSA candidates all openly advocate for importing more of those destroying France.
More later.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DenrWz3s2SD/?dlrf=ZmtvM2V2bzZzNnhk
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Depd7WjxAdG/?exln=emU3cW8wemF5ZzFw
18 comments:
Once again and as always, I almost never do posts on other nations and what's happening there. Only insofar as it impacts what our nation is doing to and in other nations. It's just the reality of my limited time that I don't choose to post on problems in other nations, whether that's conservative problems or progressive problems or otherwise.
But what does Dan think of people who engage in violence to accomplish an end? Well since Dan is consistently against stupid violence to accomplish stupid ends - or even good ends - I'm opposed to it. That would be true here as well. That I don't comment on every conservative or liberal or otherwise act of aggression in other nations doesn't mean I'm not opposed to it. Since I'm consistently opposed to acts of violence, you know the answer. Once we've stopped the violence in our nation, the violence and abuse and oppression and corruption of the current party in power, and things are cool here, then I'll be glad to start commenting on the politics of other nations. We're not there yet. Maybe in three weeks.
In the meantime, since you refuse to stand up against and fight against the corrupt aggression and oppression that's currently in power by your own party, your concern about violence overseas is relatively meaningless. First remove the plank from your own eye, son, as a wise guy once said.
Also, don't wonder about questions when you already have the answer to them. It's a waste of your time.
Also, don't make stupidly false claims. It just makes you look like an incompetent moron with allegiance to oppression when it's your party in power. Be better.
Dan
In a sane world, there would be sixty or seventy military aged muslims lying dead in the street.
For starters, the immigration policies that have lead to France burning are virtually the same immigration policies that the DFL has championed for years and existed under Biden, and that the DSA is championing going forward. In short, this is a preview of coming attractions if we adopt the immigration policies that your side is proposing. Presumably you support the immigration policies supported by the DFL/DSA candidates. That you ignore the results of policies that you and those you support politically when they are so obvious, speaks volumes to how you spend your precious time. (It's obviously not spent answering questions. I know that this should be in moderation due to your refusal to do what you were asked previously, but it is instructive as an illustration of how myopic your political vision is so I allowed THIS ONE COMMENT as an example. Any further comments will remain in moderation until you take care of your unfinished business and I can finally answer the one burning question you claim I did not answer.)
Again, you hide behind vague, general, broad, platitudes instead of specific and direct condemnation of the results of the very policies you vote for.
Your vague, nonspecific, allegations are themselves meaningless (as if much of your blather) because of their lack of specificity.
I don't wonder about non existent questions, because I didn't ask any questions. There is no question that a repeat of the Biden era immigration policies (or the adoption of the DSA policies) will inevitably lead to the kind of things we see in the UK and France.
Making a stupidly false claim, as a response to some unknown BS is like encouraging promiscuous sex and a way to preserve virginity.
I suspect that your problem is that you don't actually listen to what those on your side are saying, but retreat to your rose colored, Pollyannaish, world where everyone on the left adheres to your hunches. Try living in the real world.
That is probably correct.
1. This is what happens what you import limitless numbers of immigrants who are dedicated to leeching off of society, and eventually destroying the host society.
2. This is what happens when you neuter law enforcement, and intelligence and sacrifice them on the alter of multiculturalism.
3. This is what happens when you neuter and disarm your population and pretend that the state will protect them.
At one point, a while ago, I posited that Europe is now simply a museum. It offers virtually nothing to the modern economy that can't be found elsewhere. It has no raw materials which are in high demand. It has capitulated to progressive nonsense to the point that public disagreement of flying one's national flag are criminalized.
I now wish to modify that statement. Europe will be a museum until everything worth seeing is burned down or moved away to protect it's history.
In case I wasn't clear, my restriction on you commenting was not limited to the thread where you refused to fulfill my request. It is a blanket restriction (unless I decide that one of your nonsensical comments has illustrative value) which will remain in place until you simply fulfill my request, so that I can answer your mystery question. The fact that you haven't done as, seems to indicate that you didn't care about the answer you demanded, but needed an excuse to avoid answering my questions.
https://x.com/asiandawn4/status/2111847875479269723?s=46&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
This isn’t important enough to rouse Dan from his myopic lethargy. Furthermore, Dan and his ilk make no distinction between Aline who came to France and worked her ass of for decades, and the immigrants who destroyed her dream and wounded her when it comes to immigration policy. They’ll let anyone in, and refuse to expel the ones who are destroying things, while Aline and those like her pay the price for progressive immigration policy.
C
I think your response to Dan is spot on. While everyone is entitled on their own blogs or social media sites to comment only on that which they personally regard as of great importance or significance (some simply post on family matters, for instance), to weigh in on anything beyond those things on the blogs of others suggests there is interest there. And of course, we see that if one cares about what happens in one's own country, we clearly see examples, illustrations and consequences in other countries who do what one might wish to see happen here. Thus, to pay attention to them and speak on them would seem appropriate if one wishes those policies to be implemented here. Dan has no demonstrated no problem referring to other countries...and other periods in history...when he believes it helps him make his point (despite that it never really does), so it's not unreasonable to wonder when he's closed-mouthed about something as wildly outrageous as these "protests" by those of the ROP. With such stories such as this one, it seems more likely to mention it at all invites criticism of Dan's own policy preferences which resulted in these violent episodes, and thus, he doesn't wish to draw attention to the connection between those policies and the consequences. Here's an example I saw in an article today. It has Dan's mindset written all over it:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/10/suicidal-christian-empathy-in-minnesota/
I have to admit, while I saw one report which showed masked individuals who clearly seemed to be muslim, others compel me to think otherwise. One never knows who is throwing in with muslim miscreants or if it's just a horde of moronic "progressives". In any case, this is SOP for leftists. The more conservative protesters do not destroy when they protest.
I think I posted that picture/video somewhere. At this point, it seems undeniable that this is a bunch of angry Muslims looking for a BS excuse. Hopefully the French are learing something.
Thanks. If Dan wants to put his head in the sand and pretend that what is happening due to progressive immigration policies akin to those he supports, he's welcome to. Yet, to comment here reveling in his self imposed ignorance is something else entirely. The problem Dan has is that he's argued that these immigrants have a fundamental human right of "self determination" and they are exercising that fundamental right. Whether it's taking over entire sections of cities and declaring them "no go zones" or rioting to get what they want, this is a direct result of progressive immigration policies which Dan supports. If he's going to ignore the results of those policies and continue to champion them, then he needs to be silenced.
As I note in another post, this it is insane to think that this isn't coming to the US at some point.
Somewhere I have a story that uses government data to show that every single rapist in one of the Scandinavian countries is an immigrant. But clearly to draw any conclusion from those facts is wrong.
Dan,
I aborted your stupid comment, but I’ll respond to it anyway.
I’m “blaming” the fact that France is burning on those who enacted the progressive policies which allowed unlimited, unchecked, immigration into France. Those who’ve allowed those immigrants to coalesce into lawless zones where French authorities have no control. Those who’ve bent over backward to give immigrants all the social programs they possibly could. Thats who’s to blame. That the immigrants are rioting is unsurprising given the license they’ve been given.
Are you suggesting that the rioters are not primarily immigrants?
Are you going to spout your pet King quote that you use to justify riots again?
Are the rioters merely exercising their human right of self determination?
I’m suggesting that those who implement political and social policies that lead to the riots in France are the rapes in the UK are to blame. Just like the policymakers who set up the system that resulted in billions of dollars in fraud are to blame for the fraud. Or that those who advocated for and promulgated the policies that result in criminals being returned to the streets or allowed into the country are to blame for the fares of the victims.
C
This is what comes from choosing ignorance.
I see what you did there! ;D
Ignorance, arrogance, hubris, and stupidity are a bad combination.
11 comments in moderation because Dan somehow thinks that he’s above being held to the standards he demands of others. Because he’s chosen to argue from ignorance (bolstered by a google search or two, lead by the algorithm to sources that confirm his biases). Because he arrogantly believes that he’s above complying with one simple request and exempt from the consequences of his choice.
I’ll note a trend in what I’ve read of his comments. He tends to be unable to differentiate between items that are clearly someone’s opinion, and those which are not. This inability and his irrational biases give most of his rambling the appearance of being unhinged. Because actual video of news reports is obviously not an acceptable source of information.
What an arrogant moron.
12 comments clogging my moderation folder, because Dan is simply too proud/stubborn to simply do what he's been asked.
The abject arrogance and ego of Dan does nothing for anyone!
Especially when the arrogance and ego are coming from a place of intentional ignorance.
Post a Comment