https://twitter.com/i/status/1788247105460740457
https://twitter.com/i/status/1788189426058690747
As we continue to see bits and pieces that seem to support the notion that there were significant irregularities in the 2020 election, I eagerly await the responses from the States where these things occurred. I know that the beneficiaries of these shenanigans will keep insisting that it just wasn't a big deal, but at some point these things have to be addressed.
5 comments:
"Significant", as in, "enough to swing the election"?
Well, if we continue to search for the Truth, we'll probably find out.
There's so much which had already come to light shortly after the 2020 election that I'd say we've found out already. All we lacked was the willingness to actually look at, scrutinize and come to e legitimate judgement as to how much is valid and how much that valid evidence demonstrates the election resulted in a fraudulent outcome.
The problem, I think, is that eventually this will be adjudicated in court. Which presumes a certain level of proof will be required. I'm definitely seeing more and more evidence coming out. Hopefully the states affected will put measures in place to prevent this in the future. This does seem to reinforce the need for paper ballots.
At this point it must still be adjudicated in court. But it's far less that proof ever failed to exist, but that scant few courts chose to look at any of it. So it won't matter if any of this gets to a court, but it must get to a trial where evidence can be weighed on their merits...for a change. Evidence of all kinds has been abundant since early on. The Electoral slates of at least two states should never have been certified, Georgia being one and Penn likely the other.
Paper ballots should never have been abandoned for "technology". And those paper ballots must be cast on one day only, with absentee ballots returning to stricter criteria for allowing them at all.
Post a Comment