Of course the narrative coming from those in the media and on the left is that we just need more "common sense" or "reasonable" or whatever new gun restrictions.
This narrative ignores several facts.
1. CA already has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the US.
2. The very restrictions that are advocated are virtually identical to those in place in France
3. Virtually all of these attacks take place in "gun free zones".
Given those facts, one wonders what additional restrictions could be implemented that would have prevented either of these two recent incidents? Why do we just get vague platitudes instead of specific proposals?
Our state auditor took to Twitter to advocate for some vague new something, but when pressed for specifics was able to provide nothing. Oh, but she did delete Tweets from people who asked for specifics.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment