https://x.com/cbsnewscolorado/status/1922507931959890076?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"The Arapahoe District Attorney's Office is defending its decision to give probation and community service to a teenager who was driving illegally and, in the country illegally, when he killed a woman.
The accident happened last July in Aurora. The victim, Kaitlyn Weaver, was headed home from work when a Jeep, barreling through a residential neighborhood, slammed into her car. The speed limit in the area was 45 mph. Investigators say the driver was doing more than 90 mph.
"She didn't even see him coming," her dad, John Weaver, said. "That's how fast he was going. She was effectively killed instantly.""
"Weaver says the prosecutor initially promised to pursue the maximum sentence of two years in youth corrections: "The DA's office said this would be a 'no plea deal' case, so they were not going to offer anything; any concession."
"That changed, he says, when the Arapahoe County District Attorney's Office changed hands a few months later.
Under the new District Attorney Amy Padden, Weaver says the teen was offered two years' probation if he pleaded guilty.
"Why the change? If he had taken a firearm and recklessly just shot it and killed someone, this would be a different case. They would be pushing it completely differently," Weaver said. "There's no deterrence."
There's also no financial liability, he says, despite his daughter's medical bills, which came to nearly $1 million"
https://www.9news.com/video/news/local/local-politics/no-2-prosecutor-in-denver-resigning-after-colleagues-say-he-bullied-intimated-them/73-d42ddb76-9eaa-4fd0-b20f-74bafc8ad2fe?fbclid=IwY2xjawKRxWJleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETEwUnFiZDBSYTdEV0pNNVVGAR7_AXQAsNSOdplLnPIojM40irTUp3RehU6fX-ef8HOSywsmAv82tEY8mIL5Bw_aem_7SSR8LkAZLhrJOeZkf97mg
Sounds like the prosecutor who did this deal was a total asshole.
https://bucketlistcommunitycafe.com/podcast-arapahoe-county-assistant-da-talks-operation-aurora/
https://gazette.com/news/denver-da-disciplines-2nd-in-command-over-baseball-bat-complaint-demeaning-acts/article_30c9197e-ace5-11e9-88d8-a365b3d2ae5a.html
And a democrat.
As Colorado in general and the Denver area in particular have become increasingly controlled by the DFL, we've strangely seen some negative consequences.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1918379585907183682?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1918360195371069711?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
We hear lots of people whining about "justice" and trying to force their vision of what "justice" looks like on the rest of us. Yet, those same people vote for and support people and policies that give us the above instances. How, pray tell, is "justice" served when criminals are arrested, tried (or not) and released MULTIPLE times? How, pray tell, is "justice served" when a criminal gets released after robbing a restaurant, then goes right back and commits the same crime again?
Do not crime victims deserve "justice"? Do we not hold people accountable for their actions?
How in the world can anyone bitch about "justice", and vote for/support the kinds of policies and politicians that give is this sort of "justice".
Let alone whine about oligarchy, yet ignore Soros who simply decided to buy as many DAs as possible to facilitate these sorts of miscarriages of justice.
Scripture talks about not showing favoritism towards any when it comes to meting out "justice". Don't favor the rich OR the poor. I thin it's reasonable to argue that that would extend out to not favoring certain demographic groups or immigrants either.
28 comments:
This is the perversion of justice by the same type of people who would dare refer to Trump as a "pervert prince"...the same type of people who pervert the very word "pervert" to further their perverted agenda. Are these criminals not acting on their "self-determination"? To throw around these terms in such a perverted manner ignores the self-determination of the law abiding and denies them actual justice.
To answer your questions:
How, pray tell, is "justice" served when criminals are arrested, tried (or not) and released MULTIPLE times?
ANSWER: It's not. Period.
Why would the GOP and conservative Christian types actually VOTE FOR a convicted felon and sexual predator?
How, pray tell, is "justice served" when a criminal gets released after robbing a restaurant, then goes right back and commits the same crime again?
It's NOT. Who, if anyone, is advocating for actually convicted people being released to do the same crimes (other than modern conservatives)?
Do not crime victims deserve "justice"?
YES, they DO deserve Justice. Why, then, do modern conservative types continue to elect and support an actual felon and sexual predator and corrupt con man?
Do we not hold people accountable for their actions?
YES, we do. WHY, then, do modern conservative types continue to elect and support an actual felon and sexual predator and corrupt con man?
Since you're citing "x" and not an actual journalistic source, I have no idea what is getting you all snitty, but at the same time, you all have no credibility, given your constant support for actual criminals, felons, sexual predators, cop assailants and otherwise actually perverse, deviant, corrupt criminal types.
To quote Nathan: "YOU are that man."
(It's an actual Bible story addressing people like modern "conservatives", in case you're not familiar.)
To answer your questions:
How, pray tell, is "justice" served when criminals are arrested, tried (or not) and released MULTIPLE times?
ANSWER: It's not. Period.
"Why would the GOP and conservative Christian types actually VOTE FOR a convicted felon and sexual predator?"
Because they couldn't vote for a senile fool and his incoherent sidekick. Why do liberals continue to vote for people who (or who appoint) continually release violent felons with little or no punishment? Why do liberals remain silent while the "justice system" continues to release these scum?
I"t's NOT. Who, if anyone, is advocating for actually convicted people being released to do the same crimes (other than modern conservatives)?"
y'all keep voting for exactly the people who allow this sort of thing. You (almost certainly) voted for Walz under who's administration this travesty happened.
"YES, they DO deserve Justice. Why, then, do modern conservative types continue to elect and support an actual felon and sexual predator and corrupt con man?"
Why do y'all keep electing people who keep giving these scum a free pass? But excellent job of avoiding the point.
"YES, we do. WHY, then, do modern conservative types continue to elect and support an actual felon and sexual predator and corrupt con man?"
Well, the "YES, we do" is a lie. The rest is a dodge.
"Since you're citing "x" and not an actual journalistic source, I have no idea what is getting you all snitty, but at the same time, you all have no credibility, given your constant support for actual criminals, felons, sexual predators, cop assailants and otherwise actually perverse, deviant, corrupt criminal types."
No, I'm citing the "journalistic source"(s) referenced in the X post.
Strange that these cases primarily seem to only happen in jurisdictions controlled by the DFL, and how you seem to ignore them when they're pointed out.
All you had to do, before your off topic attack on Trump, was to simply acknowledge the gross injustice being overseen by those that folx like you vote for and support. Yet you couldn't even muster up that tiny bit of courage/sympathy.
Of course Dan is incapable of acknowledging truth and facts. He's a liar. That's why he goes on about referring to Trump in the manner he does. Being a liar, he's a pervert as well, as perverting the truth is what liars like Dan does. Thus, either term..."liar" or "pervert"...are equally accurate in describing Dan's character.
The trial of Trump which unjustly resulted in his conviction, was intended to provide pervert liars like Dan...and other Trump-haters...the ability to refer to Trump as a "convicted felon". The trial was rife with errors, it's verdict was determined before the trial began, and being leftists, those who tried Trump were perverting the law and judicial system in order to appear as if his conviction was legitimate. Note how the perverts rejection the plea for a change of venue, to try Trump in another city or state not so populated with lefty pervert liars. If the case against Trump was legitimate, the outcome would have been no different, aside from the process being run legitimately rather than as the circus kangaroo court it was.
Conservatives voted for Trump because he was a beneficially effective president the first time, in a way none of Dan's preferred politicians have been or could be or even care to be. No one on the Dem side can match Trump's love of country and willingness and determination to return the nation to its former greatness as conceived and imagined by the founders.
The con men are the lefties who lie about Trump being all the things perverts like Dan calls him. They're the lefties who con people into believing there are more than two genders, that abortion is ever necessary to save the life of a woman enduring a difficult pregnancy and that as that's a perverse lie, it's also a lie to say murdering one's own child in utero is a private decision between her and her hired assassin. They con people into believing recent conservative tax policies, including Trump's, are screwing us but enriching billionaires. That illegal aliens are not "illegal". That SCOTUS ruled homosexuals could marry each other because of a legitimate citing of the Constitution and that not recognizing what isn't marriage as if it is some infringement of rights.
All of these are perversions and constitutes a very short list of lefty perversions. But Dan pretends Trump is the "pervert prince". But we vote for him because of how his presence before us as our president makes lefty pervert liars wet themselves. And at our worst, conservatives are nowhere near the con artists, liars, perverts and defenders/enablers/supporters of such as is so common of lefty liar perverts like Dan and those like him.
As to the stories you've posted here, Dan has no defense of them and no way to mitigate the reality of them. His diversion toward spewing bile about Trump is just to deflect from his complicity in such things which are far worse for the population than anything Trump has ever done.
I had asked the reasonable question...
I"t's NOT. Who, if anyone, is advocating for actually convicted people being released to do the same crimes (other than modern conservatives)?"
You didn't answer, but said, instead (with no support):
y'all keep voting for exactly the people who allow this sort of thing. You (almost certainly) voted for Walz under who's administration this travesty happened.
I still have no idea of what specific situation you're speaking about. I've pointed out some very specific real world instances of the MAGOP world supporting known criminals and sexual predators (Trump with his overt sexual predation on women and girls and his actual felonies... Trump pardoning the convicted felons who assaulted police officers, Trump who cheated students and his charity, etc) and I'm quite clear: NO, I do NOT support voting for/defending criminals.
You, on the other hand, allege there are some news stories about some alleged Democrats doing... something... but all you cite are some X accounts. I'm not on X and I don't go to X for news. (one big difference between me and thee). But if you have actual credible news sources or research or scientists or established DATA that you'd like to cite, then I could address whatever concern you have IF there is any data to support it.
Until then, in THIS conversation, the ONLY ones who are defending known convicted criminals are you and your GOP "conservative" allies.
Until then, you're just gossiping and you know how I and the biblical authors feel about gossip.
I had asked the reasonable question:
"Why would the GOP and conservative Christian types actually VOTE FOR a convicted felon and sexual predator?"
You replied with...
Because they couldn't vote for a senile fool and his incoherent sidekick.
That is, you ALLEGE that Biden's age and mind were a concern for you, even though he was not a criminal, and so you knowingly chose a convicted felon, one who promised to (and did) pardon convicted felons who assaulted police officers.
You see, that's another difference between my type of people and the modern magop: Y'all are willing to give a pass to clearly corrupt, sexual predatory and convicted felons and you're EVEN WILLING TO VOTE TO PLACE HIM in the White House because you didn't feel comfortable voting for his opponent.
But me and my people, we would NOT vote for known sexual predators and criminals just because we didn't like the other candidate.
That's just the facts of the case. You all will live in infamy because of your choices. Your descendants will ask you "Why did you vote for the bad men?" and you'll have no good answers.
That's the shame on the modern GOP.
I'm citing the "journalistic source"(s) referenced in the X post.
So, I stooped to look at your X reference and found mention of a man named Rojas who alleged committed an unspeakable crime. If it's factual, the man is almost certainly deeply disturbed and in need of mental health care.
I didn't see any mention of Democrats defending him or releasing him. I looked up the story in multiple news outlets. NO mention of Democrats defending the rape of a dead body or acting to get him released without holding him accountable and/or getting him help.
Because of course, we aren't. That would just be another example of the vile, anti-Christ-ian slander and gossip of modern so-called "christian" so-called "conservatives."
So, once again, we find that the ONLY ones in THIS conversation defending a sexual predator, corrupt con man, deviant felon is YOU... and not only are you defending him, YOU PUT HIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
That shame and disgrace will rest on y'all for eternity.
Look at what you're doing, son. Stop. Be better. Repent.
Speaking of justice and remaining silent in the face of the most vile oppression, I wonder if any of you all will take a stand and gladly condemn racist mother, Shiloh Hendrix and her abusing a five year old child, calling him the N word...?
She has become a folk hero for many on the right for yelling the N word at a CHILD.
Will ANYONE on the right come forward and condemn this unequivocally?
Or what of Trump finally helping out some immigrants - and immigrants from Africa, at that! - But wait! It's only for white Afrikaaners...
Y'all can't keep acting like and defending (or ignoring) overt racism and not be considered not racist.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/shiloh-hendrix-woke-right-viral-racist-crowdfund-trump-maga-rcna205251
That you are unaware of the Soros DAs and the recent upswing of criminals released due to policies and appointees of those you vote for, isn't my problem.
I'll note that in two recent examples recently (the MPLS criminal who'd been released 50 times, and the Illegal alien who raped a dead body) both happened is states/cities where the DFL has ruled for years and both under people you've voted for (Walz) or would have voted for if given the chance.
It's fascinating that you bitch at Trump for his pardons, yet fail to even mention Biden's pardons.
As I've noted repeatedly, if I "cite" something from Twitter, I do so because it contains a video or some other media in the post. For example, if I post a CNN segment from Twitter, It's still a CNN segment. Further, if I post a twitter post from CNN's Twitter account, it's literally CNN you idiot.
This is a great example of you playing childish games about the limits on where Truth can be found. Ignoring the fact that if, for example, someone on Twitter posts a video of something, it's on you to prove that the video does not represent the Truth.
Except, that you can't point to one example of me "defending known criminals" for their crimes, so you just throw out this unsupported bullshit while you make up false accusations of "gossip".
Well, I do have the ability to observe Biden and Harris' action and draw conclusions from them, I also have the ability to rely on the testimony of eyewitnesses to Biden's condition, so there's that. Not to mention Biden's decade long history of lying and plagiarism, as well as the appearance of criminal activity.
None of that even matters. The chances of me doing anything that might result in a Biden/Harris/Walz ticket winning are virtually zero. I've seen what a buffoon Walz is, and mentioned (multiple times) at the lengths the MSM went to in order to cover up his various lies about himself.
Yes, we have an electoral system where we (essentially) have the choice between only two candidates. This results in every single vote for president being a vote for someone who has flaws and aspects of their history that are problematic. Like it or not, it's the system we have.
Bullshit, you and "your people" elected Bill Clinton twice and supported Hillary (despite her enabling Bill's affairs,vitriolic attacks on his accusers, her unsavory business history and multiple lies about her history). Not to mention that "your people" elected FDR, JFK, and supported Teddy Kennedy.
It's the "shame" of our political system and of fallen, imperfect humans.
Interesting admission. Admitting that you didn't even look at the source cited but simply jumped to conclusions based on your prejudices. That the Rojas story is easily accessible in multiple places seems immaterial to your lazy ass. That "you and your people" have been defending a freaking cold blooded murder for months also seems to ignore your limited view.
That you've chosen to misrepresent both the reality of the Left supporting vile criminals, and the literal text of the post, tells me that you are more interested in attacking than in acknowledging the reality.
I'm so very sorry that I don't comment on every story you wish to use as a cudgel to your satisfaction. I'm one person with limited time and I saw no reason to interrupt my vacation to satisfy you by stating the freaking obvious.
I've seen multiple people on the right condemn her actions, I (again) saw no reason to belabor the obvious. Of course, I've not seen to condemn any of the multiple examples I've posted of those on the left behaving badly.
I'm confused. Are immigrants who wish to avail themselves of legal means to immigrate due to the official government policies of the SA government and the "Kill the Boer" chants to be discriminated by folx like you because they're "white"? Or are you unaware of the persecution of Boers in SA? Or are you unaware of the fact that conservatives are not opposed to immigrants who follow the legal path, or are actually the victims of governmental or societal actions? I suspect that your won ignorance, racism, or myopia, has caused you to be unaware of the official and unofficial risks to the Boers as SA descends further into a black racist society just as bad as the previous white racist society.
FYI anything labeled "opinion" (regardless of it's source) is (by definition) not reporting actual "hard news".
Or are you doubling down on racism yourself?
"That is, you ALLEGE that Biden's age and mind were a concern for you, even though he was not a criminal, and so you knowingly chose a convicted felon, one who promised to (and did) pardon convicted felons who assaulted police officers."
Once again, pervert queen Dan perverts reality.
First, Biden's incompetence was clearly and widely known by honest people after half a century in government. At what point his stupidity crossed over into senility is of no consequence as regards rejecting him for president. It was a no-brainer to deny this no-brainer for the position and instead select a proven commodity who actually accomplished so much which benefited all Americans. The fact that other perverts like Dan choose to abide a false and unjust conviction and other false and unproven allegations is par for the pervert progressive course. The fact that other perverts like Dan choose to pretend those Trump would pardon were far less guilty of serious criminality than so many thugs perverts like Dan defend and ignore because actual thugs align with the perverted progressive narratives is just another example of the perverted hypocrisy of those like Dan.
Should my grandkids...or anyone else...ask why I voted for a "bad man", my first response will be: "What pervert progressive told you Trump was a "bad man?" Then I will begin listing all the good things he's done as president which benefited so many here and abroad throughout both his presidential terms until eventually I will ask them how can a man who's done so much good be regarded as "a bad man". Finally, I will encourage them never to take the word of a progressive, because they're perverts and liars who hate goodness, truth and facts.
"You see, that's another difference between my type of people and the modern magop: Y'all are willing to give a pass to clearly corrupt, sexual predatory and convicted felons and you're EVEN WILLING TO VOTE TO PLACE HIM in the White House because you didn't feel comfortable voting for his opponent."
The REAL and TRUE difference, you vile pervert queen, is that you are willing to falsely portray your political opponents in the worst terms you can conjure and pretend opposing Joe Biden was based on "discomfort" rather than his long history of being a worthless piece of leftist pervert shit. Given his destructive presidential record, our concerns were more than justified. Given Trump's very beneficially effective record his first time around, in addition to the wonderful things he's been doing since Jan 20, 2025, our selection of him for president is well validated. Trump is NOT "corrupt", he is NOT a sexual predator (you continue to ignore charges against Biden and his defense of his sexual predator son), and he is FALSELY convicted by a pervert leftist judge, prosecutor and jury.
Being a pervert progressive, who lies as if lying gets him Heaven, Dan focuses on crap while ignoring what matters, and what matters is that Trump is a far, far better president than any pervert lefty Dan could ever support. When Trump's term has ended, and God willing he's followed by another conservative like Vance or DeSantis, pervert progressives like Dan will begin lying about them, too. That's what they do.
You're a pervert liar, Dan, and your kind are a stain on our national character.
Progressive pervert queen Dan fails to accept his complicity in the presence of vile individuals like Rojas. Many have spoken of the many criminal types infesting our land due to the policies of those Dan supports and regards as "embracing grace", pretending the negative consequences are unrelated to the false notion that foreigners can cross our borders on their terms rather than on ours and we must accept it.
I hadn't heard of this Hendrix situation before Dan brought it up. I don't know that raising $700k through crowdfunding represents evidence of widespread right-wing racism. Indeed, the suggestion is ludicrous and a desperate attempt by the left to further that false narrative. I've no doubt some who list to starboard politically can be racist, though how much of that is the result of the overboard progressive perversion of the current condition of the black population would require serious polling data carefully constructed.
In the meantime, I don't recall Dan concerning himself with yet another case of a black person's knifing of a white kid and the very public support for the perpetrator, including a far greater sum of donations to his crowdfunding efforts.
I don't mention the above as a "what-about-ism" response, but to again highlight pervert queen Dan's hypocrisy and willingness to over-hype the sins of his opponents. It's typical and a manifestation of his perverted dishonesty, as well as that of the left's in general.
I only did the slightest of research after rejecting Dan's link, which was nauseating in it's progressive perversion, but in reading a People article...(you know..."People"...that bastion of conservatism)...I now recall I didn't notice anything referring to who Hendrix supported in the last election. I'm also wondering how it came to be believed that contributors to her crowdfunding site were all Trump-supporting MAGA people. Maybe pervert queen Dan has a more reliable source which can provide some enlightenment on that question.
Good points, Craig, regarding Dan the progressive pervert queen and his suggestion that providing for white refugees of black aggression in SA can only be proof of racism on Trump's part. Dan's clearly embracing grace again to lie in that manner.
Given that Rojas was repeatedly arrested and deported, he was a felon before he ever touched the guy on the subway.
We know which party favors unrestricted immigration.
A man accused of raping a corpse on a Manhattan subway train ..
Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/120843820.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Of course he doesn't. Yet he intuitively understands that his only option is to attack the messenger, instead of dealing with the actual stories.
Looks like just another case of a migrant's self-determination being denied.
As happens now and then, an introduction to a story results in hearing more about it without my desiring to do so. It's like being aware of, say, Nissan Altimas all over the place after buying one (and it's happened with the purchase of other vehicles throughout my life). While all I know about this Shiloh Hendrix case has been acquired since reading Dan's comment and link earlier in the day, I've now seen more than I care to see about it (because frankly, I just don't care enough about it), and now have randomly come across this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJR8245bH2o
One can always get some good insights and logic and reason when catching a Matt Walsh piece, and this one is truly good. It touches on so much about which I already felt and with which I certainly agree with regard to the story itself and also the many things he says arise from it. The only aspect with which I might disagree is with his certainty that this story will spell the end of cancel culture. That's not how the left rolls, because attacking others where doing so will demonize all which truly indicts them only serves to provoke more of the same and too often to a far more destructive degree. One can see this in the manner so many have responded to the story, working hard to identify this woman and suggesting all manner of harm they feel should be visited upon her for what amounts to a rather insignificant thing, despite how much one might oppose it (and I do...just not so insanely as is common among lefties of all races).
In any case, I don't want to take this thread too far off course, but I thought it was worthy posting the link given the story came up. It sure makes Dan and his link look all the more stupid than it did prior to my coming upon Walsh's video.
At some point the appeals process in Trump's "felony" trial will run it's course and we'll have a definitive answer. It's interesting that his prosecutor engaged in almost the exact same behavior in her personal life (overvaluing her assets) as Trump was accused of. Which is, strangely enough, another example of the double standard inherent on the left.
In a broad sense all of us are "perverts" to some degree. If a "pervert" is someone who "alter(s) (something) from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended", then we're all "perverts". Than Dan chooses to only focus on the "perversion" of one person, and of one manner of "perversion", again reveals his double standard.
It's obvious that a presidential election comes down to voting for one flawed, imperfect, person over another. Dan has acknowledged that he votes on the same criteria as everyone else (He voted for Harris because she wasn't Trump), yet criticizes those who voted for Trump for the same reason.
Strangely enough, I suspect that Paul would have referred to himself as the "chief of perverts" if forced to use Dan's vernacular.
As far as the Hendrix situation, it's obvious that she shouldn't have said it. Yet, this kid was probably referred to, or heard other black people, referred to using the same term multiple times.
I think that Matt Walsh and Jason Whitlock are on to something on this topic. I think that too many people are tired of seeing black people get away with the most vile behavior on a regular basis, or seeing a black murderer raise huge amounts of money, and see this as a way to push back. Right/wrong, I don't know. But starting with the riots of 2014-present, we've seen more and more instances of black (probably a minority of blacks) people behaving badly (on video) and simply would like to push back against the double standard.
Excellent point, why are some migrants denied "self determination" for a few (49) who are literally being threatened simply because they're white?
The amount of hypocrisy and racism from the left brought up by this story is absolutely amazing.
Millions of unvetted, undocumented, unscreened, "brown" immigrants allowed in after violating US law is perfectly OK and they should immediately be considered just as "american" as everyone else (especially egregious during COVID), but 49 "white" immigrants who went through the legal process...
I'll hit this elsewhere, but the fact that the Episcopal church is turning it's back on these few people is hilarious. Beyond the fact that it goes against their principles, these few immigrants likely need or want much help at all. The odds are that they'll be productive and assimilated in short order.
As noted, Dan (as usual) has already taken this "off topic" (a deletable offense at his cesspool), so I'll allow this.
I haven't watched the whole thing, but from what I've seen, I think he makes some interesting points.
It's interesting that the "heroes" of the left are all generally despicable people. Hamas, Floyd, Mangione, and the like get put on pedestals by the left. I'm not aware of anyone putting Hendrix on a pedestal or pretending like she's some exemplar of anything. She seems to be a person who said the wrong thing, while being videotaped (which makes me wonder why) and who was attacked for what she said. That people are willing to help her get out from under the attacks isn't the same as encouraging her behavior.
Ah, Craig, but don't you know that casting a vote for Trump in 2024 was "defending a known criminal" in the perverse imaginings of Dan Trabue. In his grace embracing way, he'll ignore all the legal errors of the trial in which Trump was found guilty, which gives Dan the liberty to insist that Trump is a felon, because he needs to demonize this man who is far better a human being than a pervert like Dan could ever be in order to deflect from that many sins of the progressive/socialist/Democrat kind.
Except it really wasn't in any real sense. It was acknowledging that the political nature of the prosecution, and the reinterpreting of the laws, were an attempt to harm Trump's campaign. That there was no victim of any crime, and that they magically turned two misdemeanors into 30 felonies, was a pretty clear indication.
But, beyond that, Dan's shtick is that voting for Trump is somehow equal to supporting/condoning/endorsing/defending everything he's ever done. Instead it's an acknowledgment that we were faced with two less than perfect (or even great) choices and had to choose the one that aligned most with our positions.
I had, and have, plenty of problems with Trump. Yet, I have/had more problems with BIden/Harris/Walz.
I'll reiterate that my vote, from a POTUS standpoint, was more of a protest vote than anything else. We know that the People's Republic was never going to vote for Trump, so the best option was to try to keep the margin close.
Post a Comment