This appears to be a request from the father of the "children" of the "Maryland parent" requesting custody because their mother is dating a "gang member".
Oh, good. You've found another rumor but with no support, just another empty claim that appears to have come to nothing.
As long as you remain consistently faithful to rumor-mongering and gossiping and unsupported slander from vague, undefined "sources." At least you're consistently a gossip and a child of hell, we can't accuse you of being inconsistent.
The consistent point of rational, just, moral adults is DUE PROCESS. IF this guy is a rapist and puppy strangler, then take him to trial and hold him accountable. IF he's not, stop with the slander.
DUE PROCESS. That is what is missing in this scenario. How are you all failing to understand this?
RE: DOGE: IF there are proven wastes of money, let's remove them. DOGE is not doing that.
Re: "gang members and rapists": IF there are gang members and rapists (whether it's the president or an immigrant), THEN allow due process to happen and hold them accountable WHEN proven guilty.
Your pervert prince HAS been found guilty and yet, you don't demand he step down.
On the other hand, ALL these immigrants being deported without due process, you want to convict them in the court of gossip and public slander. THAT is the path to hell, as the biblical authors consistently point out.
But then, you all don't really give a damned about what the Bible does and doesn't say, do you, you little childish gossips?
1. You've provided an unknown image of an allegation that may or may not have happened...
2. You've provided no legitimate source for your image... you've provided no source at all. Who says that this is even a real document?
3. EVEN IF it were real, it's one sided. Why does Ramos (IF he's even a real person) not have any custody of his children? WHERE is his proof of any of his allegations? WHO is the "gang banger" he is alleging to be taking care of the children? WHERE is his evidence for this entirely unsupported claim in an an entirely unsourced document which may or may not have any basis in reality?
Do you see? You want SO BADLY to affirm your unsupported hostility towards Mr Garcia that you're just grabbing at straws and citing unsourced, unsupported allegations.
Didn't you say you have some background in journalism? Do you realize that any good editor would have fired you for publishing this nothing allegation?
Shame on gossips and slanderers, for you are not part of the realm of God, if you take the biblical witness seriously.
What an interesting response. Are you saying that the document pictured is falsified, doctored, or inaccurate? Are you saying that Garcia did not beat his wife or admit that his fear about returning home was because he'd run afoul of "another gang", in his own gang activities?
I'm merely posting publicly available information that's been reported by others.
As long as all you have is slander about "rumor mongering" with no facts to back up your slander, I'd suggest shutting up as your hypocrisy is showing.
As I pointed out elsewhere, this "due process" argument for those who refused to follow the due "process" to immigrate is specious at best.
That Garcia has had plenty of "due process" seems irrelevant. That Dan's solution is to try and incarcerate him in the US, rather than to send him home is bizarre at best. That one gang member might be at risk from another gang seems like a risk one accepts when one joins a gang known for violence and drug dealing.
But, hey, it's all about Trump. Because it always is. That the prosecutor who "convicted" Trump appears to have engaged in the exact same crimes as Trump has no bearing, that Trump has never been convicted of rape (yet Dan continues to act as if he had), has no bearing. It's simply "because Trump is bad, all of this other stuff should be ignored".
Really, DOGE has not found one "waste of money" or example of "fraud" at all? That's a claim that should be proven.
That Biden was appointed by P-BO to head a "proto DOGE" and that DOGE is simply using the actions of P-BO to do what P-BO and Joe didn't do is irrelevant.
Oh, I care very much about what the Bible says. I care very little about what you claim that the Bible says, there's a massive difference.
1. If it's false, doctored, or manipulated, prove it.
2. As long as you hold yourself to be the sole source for what constitutes "legitimate", I'm not concerned about it.
3. Excellent questions, maybe you can find your own answers instead of demanding to be spoon fed.
No, I'm merely adding to the various examples that are being reported that Garica is not the innocent, pure as the wind driven snow, person in the MSM narrative being pushed. If the MSM was covering this story as they should, then they'd be reporting both sides of the story. They aren't, but you don't care because you buy the narrative.
Unfortunately for you, both the MSM and you, have a history of raising up all sorts of unsavory characters to push your narrative and Garcia is just one more.
If by "background in journalism" you mean an actual BA in it, then yes. If I was acting as a journalist and I didn't pursue every aspect of a story like this, I'd be a shitty journalist. Of course, any good editor would have fired you JUCO Journalism class ass because you'd have ignored any evidence that contradicted the narrative and hidden this sort of stuff.
That you insist on calling this "slander" yet cannot prove it to be so, is just you engaging in that which you bitch about in others.
Truth is the only defense against "slander/libel", by all means produce that Truth and I'll apologize.
I don't either. Given that his asylum application states that he was in fear of retaliation from "another gang" seems to quite clearly demonstrate that he was in a gang himself.
The other crap is just additional reasons why he should have been sent home.
In essence, this is venue shopping. Garcia was engaged in gang activities that put him at risk from another gang, so he runs away to the US and lands in a city where his risk of prosecution is low. Of course, if he is prosecuted, he'd much rather do time in a US prison than in one elsewhere.
Is this a rumor, Danny Boy (and I mean BOY!)? https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-bodycam-maryland-mans-suspected-human-trafficking-stop-finally-released/
Glenn, unless it's reported by one of those on Dan's list of "revered" purveyors of "real journalism", then it's automatically false. It cannot be any other way in order for Dan to retain his self image.
Are you saying that the document pictured is falsified, doctored, or inaccurate? Are you saying that Garcia did not beat his wife or admit that his fear about returning home was because he'd run afoul of "another gang", in his own gang activities?
I'm saying, quite clearly (read again, it's. not. hard to understand), that when YOU ALL make unsupported, gossipy claims with NO source, NO proof, just an empty photo/image/drawing, then no one has any reason to take you seriously.
This is especially true when one group has become known for passing on frivolous and sometimes overtly false, slanderous, dangerous claims as the modern "maga" movement has become known for.
Craig:
I'm merely adding to the various examples that are being reported that Garica is not the innocent, pure as the wind driven snow, person in the MSM narrative being pushed.
No. You're literally gossiping and, if it turns out to be unsupported, you are literally slandering someone you don't know the first thing about. A complete stranger who ALL you know is that the racists in this administration are telling you is that they are criminal rapists and threats to society. And THEY are doing so with no proof.
Did you see your idiot pervert prince claiming that Mr Garcia had gang tattoos on his hands, when it was clearly a photoshop of MS13 added to a hand, not an original photo? Does it not bother you that that KNOWN felon and pervert is passing on such stupidly false claims and, worse (maybe?) that he doesn't even understand that it was clearly a photoshop image?
I understand. You have no proof that you are correct in your hunches so you choose to play this game instead. I understand, you can't demonstrate that I've done or said anything factually wrong, and all you have in this bullshit.
With the track record of outright lies coming from the DFL, and gladly repeated by the MSM, your unsupported claims about the "maga" movement is amusing at best.
No, I'm merely repeating what has been reported. I understand that it's easier for you to play this "gossip" game and pretend like this isn't out there being reported in multiple places. I literally linked to two local sources, but you've ignored those.
Yes, I did see the tattoos which seem to be symbolism or code for MS13. I've seen the added context to explain what the tattoos symbolize.
I have to admit that your wholehearted defense of this guy would be mystifying, if I hadn't seen y'all slavishly doing the same thing for multiple upstanding citizens that y'all are stuck with to further your narrative.
Again, if what I've re posted, turns out to be wrong, I'll gladly acknowledge my mistake and apologize. That you can't demonstrate anything to be factually incorrect, and have to resort to name calling is interesting.
I don't know what "rumors" Dan is referencing since there's been plenty of official support for Garcia being a scumbag. What drives Dan's defense of this scumbag, as well as his defense of Khalil, is the fact that actions taken against these dudes are those of the Trump administration. That's all that Dan needs to know that gang-members and Hamas supporters are being unjustly treated...because Trump's team is behind those actions. Dan's hatred of Trump taints his positions.
Yeah. Like I said, it's all about Dan's Trump hatred. I can't say for certain, but I seem to recall something in Scripture where Jesus equated hate with murder. But like so many lefties I encounter one way or another, Dan simply parrots that about which he has no true knowledge.
As far as "due process", it works like this: can you prove you have a legal right to be in this country? If not, out you go. That's all the "due process" necessary for illegal aliens, especially those with connections to gangs and terrorists, like those Dan defends.
It's the love of the double standard that motivates them. Screw the proper "process" on the way into the US, but enforce every possible jot, tittle, and delaying tactic in the process of trying to get them to go home.
Hypothetically, let's say that the US sent Senor Garcia back to his homeland. Senor Garcia claims he's in danger from "another gang", yet how would the members of this other "gang" know that Garcia was to be harmed? Are the alleged people who in "another gang" even still alive or on the streets? Is it possible that Senor Garcia is concerned that his tattoos might lead those in "another gang" to identify him as MS13?
I'm thinking that whenever Dan, an absolutely, unequivocal supporter, enabler, celebrator and promoter of perversion anytime refers to anyone as "pervert prince", or other such proofs of his hatred, his comment should either not see the light of day at our blogs, or they should be edited out before publishing. The latter isn't hard to do or time consuming, as I've done it myself in the past. I know he's just embracing grace, but we don't have to put up with it.
I had heard that the other gang who Garcia claims seeks to do him harm has been eradicated or otherwise no longer exists. Don't know how exactly that mitigates any actual threat to Garcia...someone from the other gang may still act as if the gang has not been disbanded and would "harm" Garcia if the opportunity presented itself. But in general terms, that BS asylum claim holds even less water than when he illegally entered this country.
If that's the case, then what possible reason would there be for not deporting him. We know he entered illegally, we have plenty of evidence that he's not a fine upstanding illegal alien, and if the danger to his is gone then he should be as well.
23 comments:
Oh, good. You've found another rumor but with no support, just another empty claim that appears to have come to nothing.
As long as you remain consistently faithful to rumor-mongering and gossiping and unsupported slander from vague, undefined "sources." At least you're consistently a gossip and a child of hell, we can't accuse you of being inconsistent.
The consistent point of rational, just, moral adults is DUE PROCESS. IF this guy is a rapist and puppy strangler, then take him to trial and hold him accountable. IF he's not, stop with the slander.
DUE PROCESS. That is what is missing in this scenario. How are you all failing to understand this?
RE: DOGE: IF there are proven wastes of money, let's remove them. DOGE is not doing that.
Re: "gang members and rapists": IF there are gang members and rapists (whether it's the president or an immigrant), THEN allow due process to happen and hold them accountable WHEN proven guilty.
Your pervert prince HAS been found guilty and yet, you don't demand he step down.
On the other hand, ALL these immigrants being deported without due process, you want to convict them in the court of gossip and public slander. THAT is the path to hell, as the biblical authors consistently point out.
But then, you all don't really give a damned about what the Bible does and doesn't say, do you, you little childish gossips?
Look at where you're going wrong:
1. You've provided an unknown image of an allegation that may or may not have happened...
2. You've provided no legitimate source for your image... you've provided no source at all. Who says that this is even a real document?
3. EVEN IF it were real, it's one sided. Why does Ramos (IF he's even a real person) not have any custody of his children? WHERE is his proof of any of his allegations? WHO is the "gang banger" he is alleging to be taking care of the children? WHERE is his evidence for this entirely unsupported claim in an an entirely unsourced document which may or may not have any basis in reality?
Do you see? You want SO BADLY to affirm your unsupported hostility towards Mr Garcia that you're just grabbing at straws and citing unsourced, unsupported allegations.
Didn't you say you have some background in journalism? Do you realize that any good editor would have fired you for publishing this nothing allegation?
Shame on gossips and slanderers, for you are not part of the realm of God, if you take the biblical witness seriously.
Do you?
At this point, I don't think there's any disputing the reality of Garcia's gang associations. The left just pretends they believe the opposite.
What an interesting response. Are you saying that the document pictured is falsified, doctored, or inaccurate? Are you saying that Garcia did not beat his wife or admit that his fear about returning home was because he'd run afoul of "another gang", in his own gang activities?
I'm merely posting publicly available information that's been reported by others.
As long as all you have is slander about "rumor mongering" with no facts to back up your slander, I'd suggest shutting up as your hypocrisy is showing.
As I pointed out elsewhere, this "due process" argument for those who refused to follow the due "process" to immigrate is specious at best.
That Garcia has had plenty of "due process" seems irrelevant. That Dan's solution is to try and incarcerate him in the US, rather than to send him home is bizarre at best. That one gang member might be at risk from another gang seems like a risk one accepts when one joins a gang known for violence and drug dealing.
But, hey, it's all about Trump. Because it always is. That the prosecutor who "convicted" Trump appears to have engaged in the exact same crimes as Trump has no bearing, that Trump has never been convicted of rape (yet Dan continues to act as if he had), has no bearing. It's simply "because Trump is bad, all of this other stuff should be ignored".
Really, DOGE has not found one "waste of money" or example of "fraud" at all? That's a claim that should be proven.
That Biden was appointed by P-BO to head a "proto DOGE" and that DOGE is simply using the actions of P-BO to do what P-BO and Joe didn't do is irrelevant.
Oh, I care very much about what the Bible says. I care very little about what you claim that the Bible says, there's a massive difference.
1. If it's false, doctored, or manipulated, prove it.
2. As long as you hold yourself to be the sole source for what constitutes "legitimate", I'm not concerned about it.
3. Excellent questions, maybe you can find your own answers instead of demanding to be spoon fed.
No, I'm merely adding to the various examples that are being reported that Garica is not the innocent, pure as the wind driven snow, person in the MSM narrative being pushed. If the MSM was covering this story as they should, then they'd be reporting both sides of the story. They aren't, but you don't care because you buy the narrative.
Unfortunately for you, both the MSM and you, have a history of raising up all sorts of unsavory characters to push your narrative and Garcia is just one more.
If by "background in journalism" you mean an actual BA in it, then yes. If I was acting as a journalist and I didn't pursue every aspect of a story like this, I'd be a shitty journalist. Of course, any good editor would have fired you JUCO Journalism class ass because you'd have ignored any evidence that contradicted the narrative and hidden this sort of stuff.
That you insist on calling this "slander" yet cannot prove it to be so, is just you engaging in that which you bitch about in others.
Truth is the only defense against "slander/libel", by all means produce that Truth and I'll apologize.
I don't either. Given that his asylum application states that he was in fear of retaliation from "another gang" seems to quite clearly demonstrate that he was in a gang himself.
The other crap is just additional reasons why he should have been sent home.
In essence, this is venue shopping. Garcia was engaged in gang activities that put him at risk from another gang, so he runs away to the US and lands in a city where his risk of prosecution is low. Of course, if he is prosecuted, he'd much rather do time in a US prison than in one elsewhere.
Is this a rumor, Danny Boy (and I mean BOY!)?
https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-bodycam-maryland-mans-suspected-human-trafficking-stop-finally-released/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDt7y10iIrY
https://nypost.com/2025/04/29/us-news/kilmar-abrego-garcia-accused-of-being-gang-banger-in-2018-court-docs/
https://www.baltimoresun.com/2025/04/18/fox45-more-documents-emerge-possible-connecting-abrego-garcia-to-gang/
If local media in Baltimore is covering this, then I fail to see your problem.
Glenn, unless it's reported by one of those on Dan's list of "revered" purveyors of "real journalism", then it's automatically false. It cannot be any other way in order for Dan to retain his self image.
Craig:
Are you saying that the document pictured is falsified, doctored, or inaccurate? Are you saying that Garcia did not beat his wife or admit that his fear about returning home was because he'd run afoul of "another gang", in his own gang activities?
I'm saying, quite clearly (read again, it's. not. hard to understand), that when YOU ALL make unsupported, gossipy claims with NO source, NO proof, just an empty photo/image/drawing, then no one has any reason to take you seriously.
This is especially true when one group has become known for passing on frivolous and sometimes overtly false, slanderous, dangerous claims as the modern "maga" movement has become known for.
Craig:
I'm merely adding to the various examples that are being reported that Garica is not the innocent, pure as the wind driven snow, person in the MSM narrative being pushed.
No. You're literally gossiping and, if it turns out to be unsupported, you are literally slandering someone you don't know the first thing about. A complete stranger who ALL you know is that the racists in this administration are telling you is that they are criminal rapists and threats to society. And THEY are doing so with no proof.
Did you see your idiot pervert prince claiming that Mr Garcia had gang tattoos on his hands, when it was clearly a photoshop of MS13 added to a hand, not an original photo? Does it not bother you that that KNOWN felon and pervert is passing on such stupidly false claims and, worse (maybe?) that he doesn't even understand that it was clearly a photoshop image?
I understand. You have no proof that you are correct in your hunches so you choose to play this game instead. I understand, you can't demonstrate that I've done or said anything factually wrong, and all you have in this bullshit.
With the track record of outright lies coming from the DFL, and gladly repeated by the MSM, your unsupported claims about the "maga" movement is amusing at best.
No, I'm merely repeating what has been reported. I understand that it's easier for you to play this "gossip" game and pretend like this isn't out there being reported in multiple places. I literally linked to two local sources, but you've ignored those.
Yes, I did see the tattoos which seem to be symbolism or code for MS13. I've seen the added context to explain what the tattoos symbolize.
I have to admit that your wholehearted defense of this guy would be mystifying, if I hadn't seen y'all slavishly doing the same thing for multiple upstanding citizens that y'all are stuck with to further your narrative.
Again, if what I've re posted, turns out to be wrong, I'll gladly acknowledge my mistake and apologize. That you can't demonstrate anything to be factually incorrect, and have to resort to name calling is interesting.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/01/kilmar-abrego-garcia-wife-domestic-abuse-audio/83395817007/
"Abrego Garcia “grabbed me from my hair, and then he slapped me,” Vasquez Sura said in her 2020 testimony to a judge."
"In 2021, Vasquez Sura filed for a protection order a second time, citing instances of violence in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
Abrego Garcia “punched and scratched” Vasquez Sura, ripped off her shirt and grabbed and bruised her, she said in 2021."
Look at that, USA Todat spreading gossip.
I don't know what "rumors" Dan is referencing since there's been plenty of official support for Garcia being a scumbag. What drives Dan's defense of this scumbag, as well as his defense of Khalil, is the fact that actions taken against these dudes are those of the Trump administration. That's all that Dan needs to know that gang-members and Hamas supporters are being unjustly treated...because Trump's team is behind those actions. Dan's hatred of Trump taints his positions.
Yeah. Like I said, it's all about Dan's Trump hatred. I can't say for certain, but I seem to recall something in Scripture where Jesus equated hate with murder. But like so many lefties I encounter one way or another, Dan simply parrots that about which he has no true knowledge.
As far as "due process", it works like this: can you prove you have a legal right to be in this country? If not, out you go. That's all the "due process" necessary for illegal aliens, especially those with connections to gangs and terrorists, like those Dan defends.
Dan needs everything negative about Garcia to stay as rumors otherwise it undermines the narrative.
It's the love of the double standard that motivates them. Screw the proper "process" on the way into the US, but enforce every possible jot, tittle, and delaying tactic in the process of trying to get them to go home.
Hypothetically, let's say that the US sent Senor Garcia back to his homeland. Senor Garcia claims he's in danger from "another gang", yet how would the members of this other "gang" know that Garcia was to be harmed? Are the alleged people who in "another gang" even still alive or on the streets? Is it possible that Senor Garcia is concerned that his tattoos might lead those in "another gang" to identify him as MS13?
I'm thinking that whenever Dan, an absolutely, unequivocal supporter, enabler, celebrator and promoter of perversion anytime refers to anyone as "pervert prince", or other such proofs of his hatred, his comment should either not see the light of day at our blogs, or they should be edited out before publishing. The latter isn't hard to do or time consuming, as I've done it myself in the past. I know he's just embracing grace, but we don't have to put up with it.
It's something to consider.
I had heard that the other gang who Garcia claims seeks to do him harm has been eradicated or otherwise no longer exists. Don't know how exactly that mitigates any actual threat to Garcia...someone from the other gang may still act as if the gang has not been disbanded and would "harm" Garcia if the opportunity presented itself. But in general terms, that BS asylum claim holds even less water than when he illegally entered this country.
If that's the case, then what possible reason would there be for not deporting him. We know he entered illegally, we have plenty of evidence that he's not a fine upstanding illegal alien, and if the danger to his is gone then he should be as well.
Post a Comment