The MPLS police chief just quit after allegations of some sort of sexual misconduct, months after Frey renominated him with all sorts of glowing accolades about what a great guy he is. Now the acting chief has been credibly accused of perjury in the Chauvin trial among other things. How does she even hold her subordinate position with these accusations against her?
Just a thought. How about choosing people for these jobs who have somewhat higher standards of behavior?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DY3BIaHuiMc/?igsh=aGR2cHFlNmh2Njdt
Well this doesn’t make the child mayor look any better.
14 comments:
Incredible!
Yeah, it's crazy how badly MPLS manages to screw up such basic things as hiring a competent police chief who won't have sex with his employees or perjure themselves. It's a pretty low bar.
Of course for me it goes without saying that if anyone in Minneapolis law enforcement has engaged in credible instances of sexual predatory behavior, they should be fired and it should be investigated. If crimes are committed, they should be held accountable for the crimes. Would that the GOP would do that with their leaders.
Sorry, I aborted your stupid comment in haste. I should have left it as a demonstration of your foolishness and poor memory. My bad.
May 28, 2026 at 10:28 AM
Well, if this administration was truly concerned about his behavior (which they've know about for quite some time), the child mayor probably shouldn't have renominated him for a second term and spoken so glowingly about him.
Of course it goes without saying that having the acting police chief and high ranking police official credibly accused of perjury should also be investigated as well, should it not? Perhaps she should be fired as well.
I appreciate your decision to quickly jump to "predatory behavior" with absolutely zero information on which to base your decision.
Finally, let's keep in mind that this whole situation happened under the stewardship of a mayor and city council that are incredibly progressive and haven't been able to hire a good police chief for years, and have presided over the MPD being at @70% of authorized patrol officers, and a current rash of car vandalism.
Lots to be proud of.
Of course it goes without saying that those accused of this conduct should be investigated and prosecuted before anything else.
Of course the DFL is proudly running the idiot in Maine with a Totenkopfverband tattoo on his chest and a slew of evidence of all sorts of disgusting behavior (some of which appears sexual in nature), but I don't hear a big outcry to get him off of the ticket.
I guess all the sexual behavior of MLK JR was consensual and not "predatory". After all, just because he was a "leader" in the cause of "civil rights" isn't the same as a person of authority abusing his position for sexual self-gratification...something Dan accuses of Trump and more recently, of King David. No. "Saints" like MLK can do whatever and it's just peachy with Dan.
No, MLK was a saintly man who did "good" things and couldn't possibly have ever done anything even close to sexual harassment/rape.
You'll note that Dan doesn't seem to be particularly concerned that one of the 5 highest ranking MPLS cops has been credibly accused of perjury. It's not like a cop perjuring themselves isn't a conflict with their job or anything.
Craig...
"No, MLK was a saintly man who did "good" things and couldn't possibly have ever done anything even close to sexual harassment/rape."
King was an imperfect human like all of us who nonetheless was a force for great good and justice in our world. That white perverts and pervert defenders like Marshal want to try to attack him and minimize his saintliness (while defending an actual sexual deviant and voting for him three times for president!) is a sign only of Marshal's perversions and lack of moral reasoning, and perhaps yours. The difference between Dr King and King David, on the one hand, and your pervert president on the other hand it's that these are clearly good men doing good work, living lifetimes of good work, who, like all humans, had imperfections nonetheless.
While your president is a clear moral degenerate, a damaged human being with deep mental illness and deep immorality that defines his life, with no hints of any kind of strong moral groundwork. He most likely has fairly severe mental illnesses and is clearly deeply narcissistic and possibly sociopathic. That is to say he is amoral without any moral grounding. In short he is not in any sense a good man who lived a good life. Just the opposite.
That you all don't see that is a testimony to his one strength, the ability to con people and to go along with him in spite of his deep rationality and moral failures. Open your eyes men.
That’s pretty much exactly what I said, let’s hide the deplorable things King did and not expose his sexual deviance/harassment/assault because he was part of a movement that did “good things”.
Let’s pretend that the fight wasn’t against the DFL, and that none of the legislation would have passed without the GOP, because King did “good things”. How many “not good” things are enough to balance out the “good things”.
Seems like this is pretty much a summation of your myth about sins. As long as Dan thinks you did more “good things”, than not, you’re a “good person”.
Trump is merely an imperfect human like the rest of us.
If he’s mentally ill as you claim, without proof, (or any of the other vile things you accuse him of with little or no proof ) then aren’t his flaws merely the result of his imperfection and mental illness?
The very comprehensive research of Chad O. Jackson has done much to minimize his "good works" compared to the moral failings of what truly drove his "mission". And I haven't seen him focus at all on King's sexual debauchery, affirmed by even those who knew him well, such as Ralph David Abernathy. The tales are so ribald and outrageous that Kind would likely be a fixture on Epstein Island! Clearly a moral degenerate of the kind Dan can only wish Trump is simply because he likes hot babes.
Indeed, I would not put King in the same sentence with King David in order to pretend Trump is worse than either. Aside from having a guy bumped off in order to have free access to his wife, David more like Trump in terms of the benefits of their leadership for those of their nations. Jackson's research finds that there is far less benefit to the black community from the civil rights era than many suppose (not to say there were none, as even Dr. Carol Swain regards that era as impacting her ability to succeed as she has).
Dan's defense of King is truly a case of one of King's sheep knowing no better and caring not at all for knowing all the facts. He bases his hero worship on legend and myth and the repetition of it by other sheep and sheep herders. But then, Dan's clearly a marxist, too, so his man crush is unsurprising.
Dan obviously didn't watch the videos. MLK was a rank marxist.
That goes without saying.
Post a Comment