https://winteryknight.com/2026/08/20/should-we-add-human-anatomy-to-the-list-of-evidences-for-design/
What if all of the miracles we really needed to see in order to believe in YHWH were contained within the human body? What if we acknowledged that our bodies bear the imprint of supernatural intelligence and design? How would we then look at things like abortion or "transing"?
Speaking of "transing", I was driving to work this morning and came across a high school cross country team out for a morning training run. Dozens of kids of all "shapes and sizes" out for a run, boys and girsl together.
You know what I noticed? It was incredibly obvious from a significant distance which runners were boys and which were girls simply be how they ran. Obviously the one boy who was lapping a group of girls was obvious, but it was very clear that boys/girls/man/women run differently and that those differences are obvious to the untrained eye.
https://x.com/melgibson_1th/status/2090945855696052405?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
This video of the ultrasound/MRI showing a 20 week old clump of cells should be enough to end the argument entirely, but it won't. Instead we'll see more bloodthirsty ghouls celebrating laws whic would allow this human life to be ended up to the very moment of birth.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DcWZmJNDULy/?igsi=MW80Z295YWlxaHBleQ%3D%3D&img_index=6
"Malta bans abortion in nearly all circumstances — yet has one of the lowest newborn mortality rates in the world and a low maternal mortality rate to match.
If restricting abortion access cost lives, Malta's numbers should show it. They don't. Protecting unborn life and protecting mothers were never actually in conflict."
2 comments:
Two links to two incredibly obvious truths.
Yet, somehow, they are not quite so obvious to everyone.
To celebrate the ending of a life through abortion as the MA governor did is vile and ghoulish. To arbitrarily deny the most basic right to those in certain stages of development (despite the tech that allows us unprecedented access to the process) glibly as Dan does is simply falling in lockstep with a political narrative. To try to redefine a living, growing, developing, unique, individual human as a "clump of cells" or as a "non-person" is to try to cloak killing with respectability via "Science". Much like the NAZIs stripped the "untermenschen" of humanity and the slave owners pretended that their slaves were not human or a lower form of humanity, the pro abortion crowd desperately wants to strip living human beings of their fundamental humanity.
The problem is that now we can see what they are trying to kill in much more detail than ever.
Post a Comment