Monday, July 7, 2025

BOT (Sorry, I had to clear my backlog)

 

  Image

 

https://x.com/johndavisjdllm/status/1941286898967904678?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

This is an interesting topic.  The Pro-Abortion crowd insist that the "woman" (a term they can't define) has total and complete control of the decision to end the life of her child.   The father of the child, clearly has no say in the decision, even if the father wants to raise the child.    So, if the mother decides to keep the child without consulting or ignoring the father, should the father be obligated to pay child support for the next 18 years?    

 https://x.com/divinelydesined/status/1941473178116870446?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

The argument for Intelligent Design & Creation is NOT "I don't understand, therefore God." It's the opposite. We know exactly how chemistry works and we know exactly what makes biological systems function. We know that chemistry does not naturally move in a life friendly direction without explicit, highly controlled conditions and extreme intelligent guidance. And we know biological systems function based on highly sophisticated interconnected systems, requiring a specific number of engineered parts to function properly. We know nature cannot engineer these systems through sheer chance and step-by-step natural processes. Natural Selection only works if each part of the system has function at each step - but none of the parts function outside the complete system. The systems in life require intentional planning & intelligent guidance. The argument for Creation is based on what we know about how the world works - not what we don't."

 

 

 

 

No comments: