Thursday, August 27, 2026

BOT

 https://www.instagram.com/reels/Dcd-qRlA6e8/

Since when does one show love by ending the life of one's own child?

 https://www.instagram.com/reels/DceEALbx167/

https://x.com/msmelchen/status/2092097257164145097?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Btw this is not a brain fart: El-Sayed obviously knows the difference between circumcision and castration. He just can’t say it out loud without pissing off the trans activists who make up his base now. This is pure queers for palestine brain rot and it’s hilarious watching Muslim DSA types get caught out in non-Euclidean moral geometries that collapse the moment anyone measures them. Because he is locked into defending every absurd piece of gender ideology, he can’t actually answer Jesse Waters’ simple question of whether he supports gender-affirming care for under 18 year olds. So his pivoting to “what about circumcision” is just a tactic to appear as gender-affirming as he possibly can."

This guy in a freaking nut and a liar, yet Dems will vote for him in droves while also bitching about Trump and his lies.   

 https://x.com/conservmillen/status/2092272555881046267?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Prosecution’s witness, forensic psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, who assessed Lindsay Clancy over a 3 day period, testified yesterday and today that, in his assessment: - Lindsay suffers from bipolar 2 and depression - she was not suffering a manic episode when she killed her children - she did and does not have psychosis - postpartum or otherwise - she maintained full awareness of the criminality of her decisions and planned them deliberately - she committed “altruistic filicide” - killing those you love because you think it will help them but was of otherwise sound mind when she did so."

It seems a given that anyone who would kill their child(ren) because they think that death is the best option for the child (see above)  has some degree of mental problems. Yet this woman clearly planned the deaths of her children and should absolutely be convicted of murder. Had she killed them in the womb, she'd be a hero. 

 https://www.instagram.com/reels/Dcb7zn3uhBX/

This is absolutely True, and seems like a reasonable way to determine who gets to immigrate into the US. Shouldn't we be able to decide that certain cultures are antithetical to  US culture and refuse to engage in cultural suicide?  BVMLTT!

 https://x.com/larryelder/status/2092057795713774006?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

  "“Genocide isn't established by polling Jews, celebrities, activists, human-rights groups, or even scholars. It requires evidence of an intent to destroy a people as such. “And intent is precisely where this argument has a problem. Hamas started the war with the deliberate massacre of Israeli civilians, operates among Palestinian civilians, and continues fighting rather than surrendering. Israel, meanwhile, possesses overwhelming destructive capacity yet has repeatedly issued evacuation warnings and taken measures intended to reduce civilian casualties. “That doesn't look like compelling evidence of a state attempting to exterminate the population it has the military capability to devastate far more extensively. It looks far more consistent with a state fighting an enemy that deliberately makes the distinction between combatant and civilian as difficult and costly as possible. “You don't prove genocide by counting how many people agree with the accusation. You prove genocidal intent with evidence. Consensus is not a substitute for it.”"

  Image

 https://x.com/foxtruecrime/status/2092100215272869918?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 "A veteran child abuse prosecutor is firing back at the wave of public support for Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mom who admitted to strangling her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — with exercise cords. Jonathan Hatami, who prosecuted the high-profile Gabriel Fernandez murder case in Los Angeles, says postpartum illness and mental health system failures deserve scrutiny — but none of it erases responsibility for killing children. "Nobody who murders children is a victim no matter what they're suffering through," Hatami told Fox News Digital. "You're never a victim if you murder people because victims don't do something. Something happens to them.""

 https://x.com/realjustfacts/status/2091926752532582444?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

 https://x.com/PattyMurray/status/2090804679697371338

REMINDER: The single biggest driver of our national debt for the last 25 YEARS have been Republican-led tax cuts."

"IN FACT, federal taxes have consumed a roughly level percentage of the U.S. economy for more than 60 years, and the main driver of the national debt is actually increased spending on social programs. Here are the specifics: • Since 1960, federal revenues in every decade have averaged 17% to 19% of the U.S. economy with no upward or downward trend. • In contrast, federal spending has risen from 18% of the U.S. economy in the 1960s to 24% over the most recent decade with a definitive upward trend and a spike to 31% during the Covid-19 pandemic. • Over the same period, federal spending on social programs has risen from 21% of all federal outlays in 1960 to 60% in 2024 with a steep upward trend and a spike to 74% during the Covid-19 pandemic. • Social programs — which provide healthcare, income security, education, nutrition, housing, and cultural services — are mostly mandatory programs in which spending continues indefinitely unless Congress and the president pass new laws to change the status quo. • Thus, the Congressional Budget Office projects that even though taxes will remain above the historical average for the coming decade, increased spending on mandatory programs and interest on the debt will cause the national debt to grow “well above the previous record.” • In total, social programs and interest on the national debt currently account for about 76% of all federal spending. • Contrary to media outlets that blame the national debt on military spending, federal outlays for national defense and veterans’ benefits have plummeted from 53% of all federal expenditures in 1960 to 17% in 2024. • Contrary to media outlets that blame the national debt on tax cuts, most “tax cuts” are actually “tax evens” that correct for “bracket creep” that consumes an ever-growing share of people’s incomes over time due to tax laws that aren’t indexed for inflation or wage growth. • Murray cites no source for her claim, but it accords with a 2024 study by the Committee for Responsible Federal Budget that places all tax cuts into one bucket while splitting the added spending into three buckets. • When all of the spending is placed into one bucket, the study shows that added spending accounted for 61% of the growth in debt from 2021 to 2023, while tax cuts accounted for 37%. • More importantly, the study states that the figures above don’t account for the “effects of the built-in spending growth in certain parts of the budget, while it takes for granted the built-in growth in revenue.” • That methodology overstates tax cuts by ignoring the effects of bracket creep, and it understates added spending by excluding the soaring growth of mandatory social programs. • Putting aside the study’s methodology, it still conflicts with Murray’s claim that “Republican-led tax cuts” are to blame for the debt, because the study states that “77 percentage points of debt-to-GDP can be explained by legislation with some meaningful level of bipartisan support,” “while highly partisan Democratic actions explain 12 percentage points, and highly partisan Republican actions explain 8 percentage points.” Hyperlinks to the sources of all the facts above are available at justfactsdaily.com/in-fact/n00008"

One more idiot DFL senator.  

 https://x.com/AndrewCFollett/status/2091622801576997374

 "47% of government spending is on some form of welfare. Only 8% is on defense. Reducing welfare spending is profoundly difficult politically...but it must be done or we will go the way of Rome."

 

 Image

 

1 comment:

Marshal Art said...

I just read an article which made it plain that tax rate cuts by the various presidents who got them enacted (from JFK to DJT) produced revenues which without ever rising federal spending would have gotten us to low to no debt. It's ALWAYS spending which does it, and arguments are never about cutting spending, but how big the increase will be over the previous year.