it looks like there will soon be another GOP bill that addresses the immigration situation that has everyone so upset. Seems pretty simple and straightforward, I guess we’ll see if the DFL can put politics aside and solve this.
I know you can do so much better than that. I’m confident that with a little effort you can come up with a great plan, full of details and well defined that will allow you to get your commenting privileges back.
I have faith in you, that you can show the rest of the world your glorious plan, then you regain the privilege of posting whatever hate filled comments you’d like.
Clearly you don’t mean a damn thing you say here. This blog is just your fake cover to sound right. You made yourself clear on that.
“My outrage is channeled into action not words. I see no value in being a banging gong, or clanging cymbal. I’d rather invest time in feeding the hungry and helping provide clinics for the poor, than in yelling and screaming on the internet.”
You won’t find these abused children where you *claim to put in time on MLK day.
All Jesus did, by the way, here on earth was to heal a handful of people on a couple of occasions but...
I’ve noticed two responses from my friends on the left to Trump doing what they’ve demanded he do.
1. “Trump took a long time, but at least he finally did something.” 2. “It doesn’t matter what Trump did, he’s still an evil murderer”. “Nothing he can do will ever make up for this.”
I’m sorry, for a significant slice of the left this isn’t about kids, it’s abour politics.
God chastens who He loves. Jesus said “Live your enemies.” When Jesus spoke harshly to people it was to correct them, not to berate. Sadly, you don’t speak from a place of love, but anger, bitterness, and hatred. It grieves me to see people who call themselves followers of Jesus representing Him with such filth and vitriol.
Trump's latest move is still tricky. The reason for separation is the same as we see in cases involving citizen law-breakers. The law cannot determine intent...only law enforcement can. As such. Separation may is appropriate until a determination can be made that, at the very least, the claim of the law breaking asylum seeker is likely true.
I would love to hear more details from thise officials directly involved with separations, instead of the deceitfully slanted version from open borders leftists. In the meantime, I don't see why it can't be calmly explained to the law-breaking parents why procedures must be followed despite the inconvenience to them and their kids and that they can help expedite those procedures by assuring their kids that there's no reason to fear. Instead, it appears that fears are being stoked making things more difficult than they need to be.
It’s dissapointing that your thoughtful and helpful comments have to be deleted because you can’t provide a simple and detailed plan to end gun violence. I know you can do it if you try.
I’ve politely but firmly, out of a spirit of loving correction, that your commenting privilege is withheld until you deal with your previous obligation.
I apologize that your choice has caused you negative consequences, and have faith that you can provide what’s been asked of you and regain the privilege of posting your uplifting comments.
I've been trying to respond to your comments in as kind an loving a manner as I can. But, there are only so many ways to kindly and lovingly communicate that while I believe that you have the ability to produce the plan you've been asked to. Therefore, until you can accomplish that particular task, I'll just delete your comments.
Know that I'm still hoping that you'll know your plan out of the park and impress everyone with how good it is, I'm just not going to repeat it every time you comment.
I’m not sure specifically what Art asked for, but I specifically asked for definitions of terms and details of how your “plan” would work. Your list of talking points had neither of those things.
I know it might hurt your pride, but after months of asking and you dodging, that doesn’t concern me much.
What I've requested can easily be reviewed by going to any comment on my blog where I've reiterated that the terms must be met. I typically refer to the time and date of the request, and have even done so in a hyperlink to more easily jump to the blog post wherein it appears. One need only begin at the last comment and work backwards and within a dozen or so comments, perhaps a bit more, find the request. It pretty much is Craig's request at the same time.
There was a comment made about “racism” “dehumanizing” people. It’s interesting that we hear silence from the one industry and it’s defenders which is literally built on “dehumanizing” people, a disproportionate number of whom are black and brown.
The left and it’s casual acceptance of double standards is interesting.
What's worse is that the accusations are not only false, but those making them know they're false. It's further indictment of their own well-known low character. This is especially true for two reasons:
1. No evidence is ever provided to prove the accusations.
2. The various forms of aid, including immigration and asylum to name just two, belie the charge most assuredly.
No. It's just a lie intended to smear the character of those who are actually just the opposite of what is claimed by these who pretend their own support of far worse is not well known.
20 comments:
I know you can do so much better than that. I’m confident that with a little effort you can come up with a great plan, full of details and well defined that will allow you to get your commenting privileges back.
I have faith in you, that you can show the rest of the world your glorious plan, then you regain the privilege of posting whatever hate filled comments you’d like.
I know that with just a little effort, you can astound everyone with your plan and regain your commenting privilege.
I know you can do so much good for the children with your words on my blog. Thank you for everything you are doing to make their lives better.
Clearly you don’t mean a damn thing you say here. This blog is just your fake cover to sound right. You made yourself clear on that.
“My outrage is channeled into action not words. I see no value in being a banging gong, or clanging cymbal. I’d rather invest time in feeding the hungry and helping provide clinics for the poor, than in yelling and screaming on the internet.”
You won’t find these abused children where you *claim to put in time on MLK day.
All Jesus did, by the way, here on earth was to heal a handful of people on a couple of occasions but...
speak words all day.
How little you follow him.
Your concern is touching, if misplaced.
Jesus said many things.
I’ve noticed two responses from my friends on the left to Trump doing what they’ve demanded he do.
1. “Trump took a long time, but at least he finally did something.”
2. “It doesn’t matter what Trump did, he’s still an evil murderer”. “Nothing he can do will ever make up for this.”
I’m sorry, for a significant slice of the left this isn’t about kids, it’s abour politics.
God chastens who He loves. Jesus said “Live your enemies.” When Jesus spoke harshly to people it was to correct them, not to berate. Sadly, you don’t speak from a place of love, but anger, bitterness, and hatred. It grieves me to see people who call themselves followers of Jesus representing Him with such filth and vitriol.
Trump's latest move is still tricky. The reason for separation is the same as we see in cases involving citizen law-breakers. The law cannot determine intent...only law enforcement can. As such. Separation may is appropriate until a determination can be made that, at the very least, the claim of the law breaking asylum seeker is likely true.
I would love to hear more details from thise officials directly involved with separations, instead of the deceitfully slanted version from open borders leftists. In the meantime, I don't see why it can't be calmly explained to the law-breaking parents why procedures must be followed despite the inconvenience to them and their kids and that they can help expedite those procedures by assuring their kids that there's no reason to fear. Instead, it appears that fears are being stoked making things more difficult than they need to be.
It’s dissapointing that your thoughtful and helpful comments have to be deleted because you can’t provide a simple and detailed plan to end gun violence. I know you can do it if you try.
I’ve politely but firmly, out of a spirit of loving correction, that your commenting privilege is withheld until you deal with your previous obligation.
I apologize that your choice has caused you negative consequences, and have faith that you can provide what’s been asked of you and regain the privilege of posting your uplifting comments.
I've been trying to respond to your comments in as kind an loving a manner as I can. But, there are only so many ways to kindly and lovingly communicate that while I believe that you have the ability to produce the plan you've been asked to. Therefore, until you can accomplish that particular task, I'll just delete your comments.
Know that I'm still hoping that you'll know your plan out of the park and impress everyone with how good it is, I'm just not going to repeat it every time you comment.
No, you put up a list of random talking points, with no detail and no definition. Both of which I’ve been asking you for over several months.
I believe I said it was a start, certnly not a finished plan.
I did point out how nice you were to allow single shot muzzle loaders to be exempt from your talking points list.
I can’t imagine why I’d tell lies just to get you to stop, nor why you’d ask me to lie.
If you want to comment, submit a plan.
I’m not sure specifically what Art asked for, but I specifically asked for definitions of terms and details of how your “plan” would work. Your list of talking points had neither of those things.
I know it might hurt your pride, but after months of asking and you dodging, that doesn’t concern me much.
What I've requested can easily be reviewed by going to any comment on my blog where I've reiterated that the terms must be met. I typically refer to the time and date of the request, and have even done so in a hyperlink to more easily jump to the blog post wherein it appears. One need only begin at the last comment and work backwards and within a dozen or so comments, perhaps a bit more, find the request. It pretty much is Craig's request at the same time.
There was a comment made about “racism” “dehumanizing” people. It’s interesting that we hear silence from the one industry and it’s defenders which is literally built on “dehumanizing” people, a disproportionate number of whom are black and brown.
The left and it’s casual acceptance of double standards is interesting.
What's worse is that the accusations are not only false, but those making them know they're false. It's further indictment of their own well-known low character. This is especially true for two reasons:
1. No evidence is ever provided to prove the accusations.
2. The various forms of aid, including immigration and asylum to name just two, belie the charge most assuredly.
No. It's just a lie intended to smear the character of those who are actually just the opposite of what is claimed by these who pretend their own support of far worse is not well known.
Post a Comment