Are the MSM and the APL so desperate for things to bash Trump with that they'll sink to telling bold faced lies? Apparently, the answer is yes.
Trump did a campaign stop in a restaurant and because of the inconvenience he said he'd pay for everyone's food. Seems like a nice gesture, it'd be interesting to see of Biden does the same.
But since the MSM didn't see Trump pull out his wallet and hand over payment, the story was that Trump didn't pay for everyone's meals. The reality is that the meals were paid for by one of Trump's staff, and the Trump campaign ordered take out from the restaurant as well.
Look, I understand that dislike of Trump from the MSM and APL. I agree that there is plenty about him to dislike, and have no problem with reporting on those things, when they are True. But this, is simply absurd.
Speaking about real news that'll be under reported by the MSM. There's video of Biden inappropriately touching (groping) Eva Longoria's breasts.
13 comments:
I've always maintained the position that it's unnecessary to make crap up in order to disparage Trump. He's certainly got enough flaws to which a hater can cling as if there's nothing ever good to say about him. But as we all know, all a lefty has to do is make an accusation and the horde of lefties in the land will take it as gospel. It's how they roll.
"Speaking about real news that'll be under reported by the MSM. There's video of Biden inappropriately touching (groping) Eva Longoria's breasts. "
Good Lord. Your partisan bigotry has driven you crazy. You want to understand sexual predators, listen to Trump's own words, not that innocent hug. "Groping..."? What a damned liar.
Shame on you for defending actual perverts while making up false accusations that minimize the actual rapists and sexual predators you and your side give a pass to.
When Ms Longoria speaks out to say that Biden behaved inappropriately, I'll take it seriously. Perverts and pervert-defenders like you making visibly false claims? Not so much.
What is WRONG with you all?
Once again Dan defends Biden for his inappropriate behavior just as he did with Franken. You can literally see Longoria push his hands away from her breasts. But hey, you believe what you want to believe. It's good to see that you keep trotting out the "defends perverts" line, even though we all know it's a made up, bullshit, fantasy that you cling to as a way to attcak me because you can't defend Biden.
I'd ask for the evidence of you claim that I'm a "pervert and pervert defender", but I know you don't have any. FYI, it's possible to defend someone who might engage in perverted behavior for things other than their perverted behavior without defending that behavior. You know I have never defended "perverted" behavior, yet you still make the misleading claim that I have. Now you add a new false claim that you can't prove.
Art,
Trump has enough "flaws" as you call them to make even those who don't "hate" him cringe. He's a narcissistic, serial adulterer, who's amoral (at best), and who's notion of Truth changes regularly. That doesn't mean he hasn't done good things.
You can literally see Longoria push his hands away from her breasts.
No, you can't. Or at least, I can't in the video that I've seen.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/06/16/biden-hugging-eva-longoria/
But by all means, let's listen to the women and IF they claim groping happened in this very public event, then let's LISTEN to what she says.
But Longoria is not making that claim, is she?
Again, it would be easier to take you all seriously about concerns for "groping" women IF you had condemned the over the top vulgarity and sexual harassment of your pervert king. IF you had listened to the women who were actually saying "He did something wrong," INSTEAD of telling us on behalf of Ms Longoria, "He did something wrong - take it from men like us, WE know best."
Do you not SEE how you're being sexist and harmfully patriarchal in speaking FOR Ms Longoria what she did not say?
I will also say that men DO need to be more careful in how they touch women, if they touch women. But that was not a "grope," not unless Ms Longoria says it is.
Good Lord in Heaven, YOU can consider voting for a man (you actually did, didn't you) who can BOAST and LAUGH about actual sexual assault and grabbing women by the crotch and that gets NOTHING from you but another vote. And yet, you want to condemn a hug where the woman is not complaining/saying anything was amiss??
Lord, have mercy on those who defend sexual assault and rapists and misogynistically use "protecting women" as a political ploy when they find it convenient.
AGain with the "grabbing the crotch" lie. Dan is a vile, evil hater. It's what "embracing grace" looks like with Dan.
She clearly redirects his hands away from her breasts.
Well, Craig has spoken for li'l miss Longoria, so we know he must be right.
2. He's obviously a Biden supporter, so it's possible that she considers a Biden victory more important than has groping
Well, Craig has spoken for li'l miss Longoria, defaming her by suggesting she'd place sexual assault behind her partisan interests. So, we know Craig must be right.
Those old white men always are, right?
You're a pig and a useful tool for sexual predators and you don't even know it, do you?
I'm sorry, what specific woman complained that she was "grabbed" by Trump?
There are over 20 of them. If you hadn't been a defender of sexual predators/perverts who are conservatives, you'd know that.
You're a pig and a defender of sexual predators and you don't even know it. EVEN NOW, when your own words condemn you, you don't see it.
Sick, sick, sick modern conservatism.
You and the patriarchal Southern Slavery-defending Baptists can just go to hell with your patriarchal mansplaining misogyny.
"Well, Craig has spoken for li'l miss Longoria, so we know he must be right."
Well, Dan decides to make shit up and attribute it to me, so we know he must be right. I watched the video and I saw her hands redirect his hands off of her breasts.
"Well, Craig has spoken for li'l miss Longoria, defaming her by suggesting she'd place sexual assault behind her partisan interests. So, we know Craig must be right."
See above. That little word "possible" seems very confusing to Dan.
"Those old white men always are, right?"
No.
"You're a pig and a useful tool for sexual predators and you don't even know it, do you?"
Well, when all Dan has is ad hom attacks, and slander instead of substance, we know he's got nothing else.
Art,
I think that Dan really believes that Trump actually went around grabbing women by the crotch. I truly think that he doesn't understand what Trump was saying when he made those comments. I'm not trying to excuse of defend Trump for what he said, I am pointing out that he was giving an example of how certain women will allow the rich and famous to get away with almost anything. That reality doesn't make him less of a vile and amoral person, but it does acknowledge the difference between and hypothetical and reality.
"There are over 20 of them. If you hadn't been a defender of sexual predators/perverts who are conservatives, you'd know that."
I apologize, I wasn't clear. I am aware that Trump has been accused (but not convicted) by multiple women. I was referring to your constant use of his "grab them by the crotch" comment as if he actually was walking around grabbing women by the crotch. That should have been obvious by the context, but I take full responsibility for not explaining my question is more detail. I apologize for any confusion I might have caused.
"You're a pig and a defender of sexual predators and you don't even know it. EVEN NOW, when your own words condemn you, you don't see it. Sick, sick, sick modern conservatism. You and the patriarchal Southern Slavery-defending Baptists can just go to hell with your patriarchal mansplaining misogyny."
Back to the ad hom, attacks. Thank you for letting us know that all you have is false personal attacks, slander, and more bullshit.
Dan likes to believe that the "20" women who accused Trump are "credible". This is true in his feeble and lying mind because they're accusing Trump. Never mind that he has no legitimate evidence to support the "credible" claim. They just are because...you know...it's Trump and every allegation is true because it was made. That's all it takes for the small minded like Dan.
He also refused to respond to my own review of these "20", in which I presented arguments against the credibility of a good percentage of them (most accusers having little to no info provided in the press to make a judgement).
The rest of Dan's whimpering is typical lefty projection. There are none so sick, twisted and perverted as a "progressive" "Christian" who promotes, celebrates, enables and defends the actual perversion and disorder of the LGBTQ agenda. What's more, sexual predatory behavior is far more rampant in our country because of people like Dan and the vile politicians he supports.
I don't see any defense of sexual predators here. I do see false accusations of sexual predatory behavior by the grace embracer.
Worse than that, the grace embracer's defense of LGBTQ perversions results in assaults on women very often, as men who pretend they're women use enabling grace embracers to ease their ability to prey upon women and girls. This makes the grace embracer a hypocrite as well as a liar.
Post a Comment