https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y21d4zrrxo
https://news.sky.com/story/teacher-charged-with-murdering-baby-he-was-adopting-13383249
https://www.cps.gov.uk/north-west/news/cps-authorises-charges-against-two-men-following-death-13-month-old-boy-blackpool
Why wouldn't we let these fine upstanding gentlemen work with children, and adopt one. What could possibly go wrong.
https://x.com/brokebackusa/status/1933911588055978269?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
GVMLTT
This guy is making some great points about what has happened to pride parades and why "normal gays" (his term, not mine) are distancing themselves from the over sexualized spectacle.
https://x.com/rob_flaherty/status/1933597057140531570?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Over the past few years we've seen people marrying animals, plants, and themselves. Why would anyone balk at someone having an affair with AI?
https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1933505416077451557?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
1. Given that fact that voting is reserved for citizens only by the constitution, on what possible grounds could this judge make this ruling?
2. Thank goodness, as it will hopefully allow SCOTUS to reinforce the constitutionally protected prohibition on non citizens voting.
3. Beyond the constitutional prohibition, voting requirements are a state prerogative, not federal.
4. This notion that low level federal judges miraculously have this massive amount of power over an entire branch of government is insane.
https://x.com/efischberger/status/1933020283176362349?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Of course the pro-Hamas left isn't going to trumpet Hamas latest mistake.
https://x.com/claytravis/status/1933171061601841545?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/msmelchen/status/1932922441388732512?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Clearly DEI is in name only from those on the left.
https://x.com/davidsacks/status/1932933894317162546?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
This isn't getting much coverage on the MSM, is it?
https://x.com/tonylanenv/status/1934089285705380249?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Another instance of the facts going against the narrative.
14 comments:
First link goes to the “March to Gaza” nonsense.
These LEFTIST judges are getting out of hand. Common sense (not common to the LEFT) says only actual citizens be allowed to vote, with an requirement to prove they are indeed citizens of the USA.
Fixed it.
Yes, the notion that these lower level federal judges all of a sudden have veto power over anything the executive branch does is absurd.
1st three links of the post:
Sick and disgusting to say the very least. Though some who might read this are sure to object, the sad reality that this is disproportionately found among the "gay" community is unassailable. It is an extreme manifestation of their disorder.
4th link:
Rick Grennell is funny. He keeps saying "normal gays", as if there is such a thing. It's oxymoronic. He's just Dan saying his embrace of abomination is OK because he's not as extreme as the most radical of his kind. The lie of "1993" is still a lie. They are not like us. They are not even like actual normal people who indulge sexual immoral compulsions. They are extreme in their immorality by virtue of their choices. It was never about equality. It was about imposing their immorality upon the nation as moral behavior and their demand that we accept it as such. So now, they're truly treated unequally by virtue of their immorality being treated as moral or normal. It's neither and never will be. Equal treatment is acknowledging their behavior is immoral, just as acknowledging the immoral behaviors of normal people.
I can "accept" homosexuals but will always reject their behavior as the abomination it is. Acceptance is a two-way street and Grennell believes those like me should be pushed out of the GOP (not that I'm a card-carrying member) for continuing to speak truthfully about the issue. It's like he demands absolute agreement as the Dems do (as they reject pro-life women, for example) when he was "accepted" as one of us despite that part of him which is perversion. I prefer all conservatives believe exactly as I do, but I more than well aware that's silly. I "accept" him in the party despite his obvious defect and conscious embrace of it, knowing the principles of conservatism have wide appeal to intelligent people, which he is. But his presence among us will never mean his perversion is acceptable. It's exactly the same as our refusal to accept Trump's adultery while we accept him in his current position.
AI love: just heard of this story on the Glen Beck show this morning. Wild and the woman is educated in mental health and social work.
"on what possible grounds could this judge make this ruling?"
On the same grounds as the Roe and Obergefell rulings: The Progressive's Magic Rulings Book. This allows fantasy, fiction and personal preferences become reality when needed.
"pro-Hamas left isn't going to trumpet Hamas latest mistake"
How is it a mistake? They did it on purpose. Do stupid things, win stupid prizes. Gazans stupidly put these animals in power. Their prize is the ongoing suffering doing so provoked.
"Clearly DEI is in name only from those on the left."
That sounds like they're liars? Could that possibly be true? (end of sarcasm)
"This isn't getting much coverage on the MSM, is it?"
That Trump! So stupid, so incompetent...totally destroying our nation! BAD President Trump! BAD president Trump!
"Another instance of the facts going against the narrative."
You mean progressives aren't pacifists? Incredible!
Yeah, and folx like Dan fight for their right to adopt and to purchase babies.
It seems pretty obvious that "normal homosexuals" are the ones who just want to be left the hell alone. They fought their fight, and they don't need or want the rest of this crap.
Why I thought it worth posting is that it is highly likely that the Dan's of the world would be highly offended by the term.
Makes me wonder about the entire education establishment that teaches about mental health.
So, no grounds. It literally, directly, contradicts the constitution. Unlike Roe which made up a right out of thin air, this is blatantly unconstitutional.
The only possible way the ASPL can refer to this recent slaughter of aid workers is as a "mistake". It wasn't, but that's how they'll make excuses for it.
I don't think it's a lie in the sense that they know the Truth and choose the opposite as much as they truly believe that they actually are the paragons of DEI, all the while discriminating out the ass against demographic groups that aren't on the preferred list.
Why would any good economic news get covered in the revered MSM? It goes against the narrative.
Yeah, like every president there's some good and some bad. The two-three trillion added to the debt is the less good side of things.
Progressives have never been "pacifists" as far as it's some official requirement. It's just a fantasy of Dan's that allows him to excuse or minimize the actions of progressives.
I understood the distinction Grennell was trying to make between homosexuals like him and those who openly indulge their perversions in parades. It's just that "normal" is in no way an accurate description of any homosexual. "Restrained", "discreet"...words like those would've been better.
I don't believe lefties don't know what the truth is about the lies they perpetuate. They're explanations and excuses are too lame.
I guess it's a semantic distinction that really isn't important. If you knew what he was communication, I fail to see how adding complication helps.
Wasn't trying to add anything. I was just greatly amused by the oxymoronic notion of "normal homosexuals".
If you say so. You acknowledge that you understood the point that he was making, yet felt the need to add the additional "no homosexuals are normal" stuff on top of his point.
I'd understand it if Dan got worked up by "normal", you getting worked up makes less sense.
Post a Comment