https://x.com/javiernegre10/status/2080377188356964710?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"The two great cities of the Anglo-Saxon world are governed by Muslim-communists, London and New York. Can you imagine the two largest cities in the Arab world governed by conservative Christians? Multiculturalism is the greatest scam of the century and of the West. It is an invasion."
In all seriousness, can anyone imagine a Christian (conservative or not) being the leader of Cairo, Riyadh, Damascus, or Tehran?
16 comments:
No. I cannot imagine a conservative Christian, especially a modern MAGA-type Christian, running a very large city but think about what that means....
To run a very large city like London or New York City - full of a great diversity of humanity - in a free republic, that means you have to WIN the election. You have to convince the majority of the people that your ideas are the best.
And so, no, I can't imagine a Christian extremist or a Muslim extremist winning in a large diverse city because their ideas are just not winnable or convincing. In fact they are often dangerous or at least sound dangerous and a threat to human rights.
Are you thinking about this from that point of view? What is it about religious extremism, whether Muslim or Christian or otherwise, that is failing to convince large cities everywhere to vote for them?
Isn't it just possible that their views and policies are considered untenable and ill-advised at best, and contrary to a free republic at worst?
I suppose you can easily support the idea that people in large cities should only vote for the candidates that they think are the best and present the best, most practical, most rational ideas?
Dan
Also do you see how problematic and xenophobic and irrational it is to call it an invasion when people win elections and you really wish they hadn't?
That's not, literally not, an invasion. It's a free republic. It's the idea, the marketplace of ideas where the best ideas should win.
This plays into the racist Great Replacement Theory conspiracies.
"These people are not like us. They are invaders. They are monsters. They are a threat! Cats and dogs living together! Mass hysteria!! Aaaagghhhh!!!"
Don't do that. Be better. If you can't present ideas that win people over, the problem is either your ideas or your presentation or both.
Dan
I couldn’t have aborted this for anything. The spectacular degree to which you’ve missed the point is truly astounding. The level of idiocy surpasses anything I’ve ever seen from you.
That you think a communist with absolutely zero accomplishments in the real world is somehow a paragon of ability to govern is confounding. His actions so far are already having a negative effect on NYC, but who cares, right?
I’m gobsmacked by the display of a complete lack of comprehension.
The stupidity continues.
I repeat:
Isn't it just possible that in large diverse cities, conservative "Christian" views and policies are considered by fellow citizens untenable and ill-advised at best, and contrary to a free republic at worst?
If not, how are you trying to explain it? Do you have any data for that theory? Maybe people of color who are more urban in nature or more foreign or not as smart as you are as a white Christian. Is that your guess?
Dan
You repeating stupidity doesn’t magically make up for how spectacularly you’ve missed the point.
Your ignorance, bias, stupidity and partisanship has blinded you.
Maybe reading for understanding is the problem.
This is hilarious on so many levels. But then, as a text-book example of a useful idiot, Dan's incapable of recognizing the success of his kind toward their ultimate goal. I'm certain a montage of Dems explicitly promoting the notion of exploiting immigration to alter the ideological leanings of the voting public away from the GOP, and thus American principles. It was never a conspiracy "theory". That's just what people like Dan are told by their overlords. This actual conspiracy is pretty much achieved or we'd never have an ashhole like Mandami running our largest city. His doing so isn't a matter of "diversity". It's a matter of stupidity, apathy and the fact that so many believe his bullshit is feasible.
Dan's kind has so badly moved our culture away from the founding principles that it would indeed be next to impossible for a conservative Christian to be elected to high office. It wouldn't be because proposed policies are detrimental in any way. Dan certainly can't explain which policy of even a bad example of a believer like Trump is bad! So, if the following is true:
"Isn't it just possible that in large diverse cities, conservative "Christian" views and policies are considered by fellow citizens untenable and ill-advised at best, and contrary to a free republic at worst?"
...that citizens in large "diverse" cities view conservative Christians in such a negative way, it's not because the policies are truly "untenable and ill-advised at best, and contrary to a free republic at worst". It's because the citizens are stupid, selfish and immoral. Again, Dan's wholly incapable of finding fault with any policy a Christian conservative might propose. He just asserts they would be, mostly because his perversions would be outlawed or restricted.
Re: missing the point...
What pray tell do you think the point is coming from your far right extremist dude?
https://globalextremism.org/post/convicted-spanish-agitator-joins-maga/
I'm just dealing with your literal quotes, which say...
"The two great cities of the Anglo-Saxon world are governed by Muslim-communists..."
He is correct in noting these two gentlemen are Muslims. He is incorrect in stating that they are communist. New York's mayor is a democratic socialist, not a communist. The London mayor is not even a democratic socialist. He's more of a slightly left democrat.
So the dude is leading with what he thinks is inflammatory language, making false claims about these two mayors, who were elected by the majority of their constituents. A free democratic-republic.
He then asked the question...
"Can you imagine the two largest cities in the Arab world governed by conservative Christians?"
I literally just answered the question. No, I can't imagine a conservative extremist winning an election in a diverse metropolitan city in a free republic.
That's a literal answer to his literal question.
Now I know he's likely trying to inflame passions of people who are concerned about great takeover theories and that sort of thing. "These people are not like us!" Do you think he's NOT doing that in asking this question? If not, what do you think the point of his question is?
He then made two unsupported claims, which are both objectively false claims.
"Multiculturalism is the greatest scam of the century and of the West. It is an invasion"
Multiculturalism is not a scam. That's just stupidly false. It's just the reality that we live in a big diverse world with all sorts of cultures. Multiculturalism just affirms that this is generally a good thing. Do you think, in your head, that multiculturalism is not a good thing?
He also falsely states that this is an invasion. That's inflammatory language suggesting an organized attack by outsiders. People from different cultures just have to move to places where there is the liberty to do so. It points to the success of free republic ideals. Are you suggesting that there's some sort of invasion happening, organized and malignant? If so, do you recognize how insane that sounds?
So what DO you think the point is if not that? You know, what he just literally said.
Dan
It’s been hilarious and it’s just getting better.
Please, please, keep this up. The utter ignorance is astonishing. Do not stop, this is so freaking hilarious.
The level of ignorance and stupidity is staggering, but the arrogance and confidence in the ignorance and stupidity just makes it better.
False claims and dodging reasonable questions and repeating conspiracy theories do not speak well of any of y'all. You should be ashamed and may that shame cause you to repent and be better.
You were caught. You endorsed stupidly false claims. Just admit it, apologize, and move on.
Dan
Oh Dan,
So predictable. You make yourself look like a moron, miss the point, double down on missing the point, then pivot to your same old BS script.
Last time you pulled out the tired old “don’t answer questions” script I went back and answered everything at least once.
You continued to ignore questions and didn’t even have the common courtesy to acknowledge that I’d answered your BS questions.
Now you’re reduced to the same old BS, because you don’t even know what you’ve missed and all you have is to fall back on your stock attempts to establish dominance.
Dear Dan Trabue,
I have a sincere question for you to answer if you do not mind me asking. Are you better educated than Marshal Art and/or Craig?
Here's the problem you're having.
I'm pointing out what the fellow objectively literally said.
You said I'm missing the point.
I pointed out the literally objectively false claims in what the guy said.
You're saying I missed the point.
You don't answer questions and say it's me not answering questions.
I ask you to clarify and you run and hide. You're beaten on every point and this is the sad low state you've reduced yourself to. You're a cowardly pig wallowing in mud and I'm not sure that you even know it.
This is just sad.
Dan
Yes, it is sad that you so quickly and so obviously revert to type. Big claims, announcing that you’re retiring that, claiming that everyone but you is making false claims. It’s predictable, tired, boring, ridiculous, absurd, and completely uncreative. Just the same old crap.
I’m laughing at you because you still haven’t figured out what you’ve missed and choose bluster and empty accusations.
Thanks for the entertainment.
Post a Comment