Wednesday, July 15, 2026

The DFL Is More Interested In Pushing A False Narrative, Than In Doing The WIll Of The People

https://x.com/HouseDemocrats/status/2077077816189800800 

Yet the Fed just revealed that the affordability crisis was driven by unchecked immigration, and the data shows that inflation is lower now than during Biden.   

 

https://x.com/bskimike22802/status/2077119191371673797?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

Ah yes. "Partisan voter suppression legislation." That's a fascinating way to describe a bill that 80-84% of Americans support — INCLUDING roughly 70% of your own voters. Quick question, and I genuinely want an answer: at what point does a policy stop being "partisan" and start being "something four out of five Americans agree on regardless of party"? Asking for a country. Let's do the math you skipped. Pew (August 2025): 83% of adults favor requiring photo ID to vote — 95% of Republicans, 71% of Democrats. Gallup: 84%. Rasmussen (March 2026): 82%, including 70% of registered Democrats. Break it down by race and the "suppression" narrative collapses further — 85% white support, 82% Hispanic, 76% Black. So either three-quarters of Black America signed up to suppress itself, or the premise is wrong. I'll let you sit with that one. The SAVE Act accepts a REAL ID, a passport, a military ID with service record, OR a birth certificate plus photo ID. Four separate paths. That's not a wall, that's a buffet. You need photo ID to buy Sudafed, board a flight, or get into most DNC events with credentials — but somehow verifying who's electing federal officials is where you draw the line. Curious hill. And "cost-of-living crisis they created" is a bold sentence from the caucus that just spent weeks holding a clean CR hostage to preserve COVID-era ACA subsidies you yourselves wrote to expire. Not one Republican voted to end those subsidies. Your own party did that in 2021. Own it. Quinn's Law #6 applies neatly here: facts are the enemy of liberalism. That's precisely why the post leads with a slogan instead of a citation."

 Image

 

We know that the founders did not want, and took steps to prevent, a direct democracy.   Yet, if we were to put voter ID to a vote of the people it would pass overwhelmingly.  Even among the ASPL and minority voters.  This issue has as much or more bipartisan support as anything,   Yet the DFL insists on preventing the legislature from doing to clearly expressed will of the people.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 comment:

Marshal Art said...

"Partisan voter suppression legislation."? It's almost as if the Dems are lying!