That's only because the modern progressives are anti-Semitic. They do the same when conservatives, whites and Christians (or any combination of the three) are victimized by leftist groups. The modern progressives are the true threat to the republic.
Which is incredibly strange as the APL has convinced the Jewish segment of the population that they must support DFL candidates, when the DFL has not been particularly friendly to the Jewish voting bloc. With the exception of Truman recognizing Israel in '48, which was (I believe) as much about guilt from the Holocaust, and a desire to check Soviet expansion in the Middle East.
I don't know what in the heck you all are talking about (given that I don't even give a fart about Twitter opinions and conspiracies and nonsense - I prefer actual professional journalists and experts), but you're talking down to Jewish folk in much the same manner that you talk down to black folk and immigrants, women and LGBTQ folks. Oh, if ONLY, those oppressed groups would listen to you, THEN, they'd be much smarter and better off.
Even in Israel there's a significant percentage who are leftists. It is they who are mostly responsible for Bibi getting heat from within. It's as amazing they vote Dem as it is for so many blacks to do so, in the as yet unproven assertion the Dems give a damn about them. Among blacks and other minorities, however, we're seeing a true awakening taking place, particularly with the current waste of space in the White House. Many blacks concede Obama did nothing for them. What's important for all such people is for conservatives to reach out and explain reality to them.
I wonder if the savagery of Oct 7 will open any leftist Jewish eyes to their blunder. I can see no reason for the support given to the Dem party except that there are so many who don't pay attention. The biggest leftist loudmouths are simply straight up liars or insanely stupid.
"I don't know what in the heck you all are talking about (given that I don't even give a fart about Twitter opinions and conspiracies and nonsense - I prefer actual professional journalists and experts), but you're talking down to Jewish folk in much the same manner that you talk down to black folk and immigrants, women and LGBTQ folks. Oh, if ONLY, those oppressed groups would listen to you, THEN, they'd be much smarter and better off."
1. In case you haven't noticed, every Twitter link I post includes a video. This is a way that I can allow people to speak for themselves.
2. You keep bitching that I don't "listen to" whatever group you want to protect, yet here I am listening to those you want to protect in their own words.
3. It's strange how you expect everyone to listen to you and that they'd be better off to do so. Yet, you accuse me of this when I haven't/don't engage in this on a regular basis. I do occasionally suggest that (IMO) people/groups would be more effective of they did certain things instead of what they are doing. But rarely would I insist that anyone should do as I tell them to.
I would suggest that Hamas should stop butchering, raping, killing, and kidnapping innocent women and children, because that would not be barbaric, but that's just a suggestion.
There is a left wing everywhere. Yet I'm confident that even the Israeli leftists do their two years of mandatory service in the IDF, and report for duty when called up. Because they're smart enough to realize that to fail in that civic responsibility could lead to the death of Israel as a nation.
I think that it's better for groups who are manipulated by political parties to come to those realizations on their own. The likelihood that they'd listen to anything from the "other guys" no matter how well researched, logical, and supported is slim. It's a slower process, but allowing the natural discovery of these political manipulations will be much better in the long run.
Dan said he prefers "actual professional journalists and experts". That's funny. The "actual professional journalists and experts" he cites and defends are leftist hacks spewing the party line. They aren't "professional" in any true sense of the word since they go above and beyond mere bias and get right into leftist propaganda that sheep like Dan lap up like pigs with slop. I know this to be true because of how routine it is to find obvious fault with the few sources Dan deigns to provide. And he calls me "too far gone"! Ha!
As I pointed out, most of the X links I posted contain actual video, many produced by professional journalists. Obviously, Dan isn't interested in anything regardless of provenance that doesn't conform to his narrative.
He's previously disregarded anything from certain advocacy groups as having any value, while regularly offering work by advocacy groups he likes as "proof". He seems to have a very small and ever changing pool of acceptable "professional journalists" that he will unquestioningly accept as gospel when it's convenient for him. He also tends to show disdain for anyone who is a "professional journalist" who doesn't suck at the teat of the MSM/Legacy media. By any stretch of the imagination much of the best investigational journalism is being done outside of the MS/Legacy media, yet to Dan it's all worthless. Actual video of someone saying things that make Dan's side of things/narrative look bad (think PP), is worthless and has no value. But a report from the Sierra Club about climate change is the gospel truth.
8 comments:
That's only because the modern progressives are anti-Semitic. They do the same when conservatives, whites and Christians (or any combination of the three) are victimized by leftist groups. The modern progressives are the true threat to the republic.
Which is incredibly strange as the APL has convinced the Jewish segment of the population that they must support DFL candidates, when the DFL has not been particularly friendly to the Jewish voting bloc. With the exception of Truman recognizing Israel in '48, which was (I believe) as much about guilt from the Holocaust, and a desire to check Soviet expansion in the Middle East.
I don't know what in the heck you all are talking about (given that I don't even give a fart about Twitter opinions and conspiracies and nonsense - I prefer actual professional journalists and experts), but you're talking down to Jewish folk in much the same manner that you talk down to black folk and immigrants, women and LGBTQ folks. Oh, if ONLY, those oppressed groups would listen to you, THEN, they'd be much smarter and better off.
[rolls eyes]
Even in Israel there's a significant percentage who are leftists. It is they who are mostly responsible for Bibi getting heat from within. It's as amazing they vote Dem as it is for so many blacks to do so, in the as yet unproven assertion the Dems give a damn about them. Among blacks and other minorities, however, we're seeing a true awakening taking place, particularly with the current waste of space in the White House. Many blacks concede Obama did nothing for them. What's important for all such people is for conservatives to reach out and explain reality to them.
I wonder if the savagery of Oct 7 will open any leftist Jewish eyes to their blunder. I can see no reason for the support given to the Dem party except that there are so many who don't pay attention. The biggest leftist loudmouths are simply straight up liars or insanely stupid.
"I don't know what in the heck you all are talking about (given that I don't even give a fart about Twitter opinions and conspiracies and nonsense - I prefer actual professional journalists and experts), but you're talking down to Jewish folk in much the same manner that you talk down to black folk and immigrants, women and LGBTQ folks. Oh, if ONLY, those oppressed groups would listen to you, THEN, they'd be much smarter and better off."
1. In case you haven't noticed, every Twitter link I post includes a video. This is a way that I can allow people to speak for themselves.
2. You keep bitching that I don't "listen to" whatever group you want to protect, yet here I am listening to those you want to protect in their own words.
3. It's strange how you expect everyone to listen to you and that they'd be better off to do so. Yet, you accuse me of this when I haven't/don't engage in this on a regular basis. I do occasionally suggest that (IMO) people/groups would be more effective of they did certain things instead of what they are doing. But rarely would I insist that anyone should do as I tell them to.
I would suggest that Hamas should stop butchering, raping, killing, and kidnapping innocent women and children, because that would not be barbaric, but that's just a suggestion.
There is a left wing everywhere. Yet I'm confident that even the Israeli leftists do their two years of mandatory service in the IDF, and report for duty when called up. Because they're smart enough to realize that to fail in that civic responsibility could lead to the death of Israel as a nation.
I think that it's better for groups who are manipulated by political parties to come to those realizations on their own. The likelihood that they'd listen to anything from the "other guys" no matter how well researched, logical, and supported is slim. It's a slower process, but allowing the natural discovery of these political manipulations will be much better in the long run.
Dan said he prefers "actual professional journalists and experts". That's funny. The "actual professional journalists and experts" he cites and defends are leftist hacks spewing the party line. They aren't "professional" in any true sense of the word since they go above and beyond mere bias and get right into leftist propaganda that sheep like Dan lap up like pigs with slop. I know this to be true because of how routine it is to find obvious fault with the few sources Dan deigns to provide. And he calls me "too far gone"! Ha!
As I pointed out, most of the X links I posted contain actual video, many produced by professional journalists. Obviously, Dan isn't interested in anything regardless of provenance that doesn't conform to his narrative.
He's previously disregarded anything from certain advocacy groups as having any value, while regularly offering work by advocacy groups he likes as "proof". He seems to have a very small and ever changing pool of acceptable "professional journalists" that he will unquestioningly accept as gospel when it's convenient for him. He also tends to show disdain for anyone who is a "professional journalist" who doesn't suck at the teat of the MSM/Legacy media. By any stretch of the imagination much of the best investigational journalism is being done outside of the MS/Legacy media, yet to Dan it's all worthless. Actual video of someone saying things that make Dan's side of things/narrative look bad (think PP), is worthless and has no value. But a report from the Sierra Club about climate change is the gospel truth.
Just more of the double standard.
Post a Comment