https://x.com/collinrugg/status/1970560320847651001?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Election denial is bad, unless Kamala and Hillary do it.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/charlie-kirk-left-wing-terrorism/684323/
While I appreciate the honesty, and hope that this shifts the focus to the growing problem, I'll not that this is limited to "terrorism" and for some reason excludes the left wing terrorism in the '60s and '70s. Is it safe to say the "terrorism" is worse than simply "violence"?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/charlie-kirk-left-wing-terrorism/684323/
If this is accurate, and a quick bit of research suggests that it is, then the whole ASPL narrative just got blown out of the water. The fact that it was hysterical and based on exaggerating what Trump and Kennedy said is something else entirely.
https://x.com/spencerpratt/status/1970522234713448958?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Well, CA just implemented actual censorship which does seem to violate the 1st Amendment.
https://x.com/westernlensman/status/1970516688064975143?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DQSlPV_NGti4&ved=2ahUKEwjnsZWX6fGPAxUlg4kEHXQxF98QwqsBegQIFxAG&usg=AOvVaw12NgIxXlnLxiShlf43uYJp
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6380016323112&ved=2ahUKEwjnsZWX6fGPAxUlg4kEHXQxF98QwqsBegQIGBAF&usg=AOvVaw2Rzxv20--D4QqaA9WNRG7M
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/23/youtube-creators-banned-covid-election-misinformation-apply-reinstatement.html&ved=2ahUKEwjnsZWX6fGPAxUlg4kEHXQxF98QFnoECDUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2y_ZyGf6VRSmxokz9i9N
More actual censorship, by the actual government.
2 comments:
---There were all manner of "illegitimate president" election denying by the left for each of Trump's presidency, and of course, Al Gore has a stick up his ass over Bush 43's win over him. Bush was also referred to as an illegitimate president. So the difference between the two sides is that the election we know was illegitimate had mountains of evidence to support the claim, while the left were just pissing themselves every time they lost.
---This Atlantic piece references the very CSIS "study" which falsely portrayed the right as being more violent in decades past, by the use of restricting what used to make that case so that the predetermined conclusion could appear supported. We don't really need to see another "study" to know what all obvious evidence indicates.
----Was this third link a duplicate of the second and thus inadvertently posted as a different link? In any case, I won't be quick to rely on the Atlantic for much of anything.
----Wow! Leftism at it's most vile and again doing exactly what they project onto the right as unique to the right (when it's not even hardly done!).
----
----
----
----All good to admit and expose leftist stifling of free speech rights. Those of us paying attention were already well aware.
Election denial for me, but not for thee, seems to be the credo of the left.
I'd just like to see an actual compilation of all of the instances of "political violence" (or threats of) from the mid '60s until today, which accurately identifies the side of the aisle the perpetrator was on, if it is possible to do so. Then we can actually draw a more accurate conclusion.
It's possible.
Yeah, why would anyone want actual censorship by the actual government to be discussed.
Post a Comment