https://x.com/matt_vanswol/status/1967938461962473597?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
What have we here. A Pulitzer Prize winning "journalist" unable to provide a source for a "quote" she used to defame Charlie Kirk, how could that be?
Aren't we supposed to "revere" the MSM as "real" journalists who'd never choose to use a "quote" which had been proven to be false?
I'm more and more comfortable with the "We don't hate (I'd say distrust) the MSM enough." crowd.
2 comments:
It shows how lazy the leftist MSM is, and how unreliable.
Is there a decent parallel one can present of the right-leaning media sources doing the same thing?
I have no idea, although I can't imagine that there isn't a right leaning journalist who's let ideology get in the way of the Truth. The problem is that the institutional MSM is so heavily left wing and has so much control of the narrative that the effect is magnified.
Post a Comment