https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/scholarly-writings/christian-doctrines/is-penal-substitution-unjust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIaRSLG2_vw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bpAtKdJHNM
https://forum.evangelicaluniversalist.com/t/william-lane-craig-defends-atonement-and-penal-substitution/6020
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/scholarly-writings/christian-doctrines/is-penal-substitution-unsatisfactory
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/scholarly-writings/christian-doctrines
I know that the doctrine of Penal Substituionary Atonement generates a fair amount of controversy so I thought I'd provide some expert information.
3 comments:
Obviously, if they disagree with Dan and his troll, they can't possibly be experts.
Wow. I just started reading the first link (thanks for providing them rather than supposing one must look such up one's self), and I can't wait to get to the rest. This first one dives deeper than I ever felt necessary for me to go to feel PSA is indeed a Biblical teaching, but I'm certainly not against seeing how others have. What could the rest of your links have in store? Can't wait to find out!
Obviously William Lane Craig is a mental midget and completely uneducated compared to Dan, but still...
Obviously, these links needed to be provided because they are related to something that is not being extensively covered on various media outlets.
Enjoy. Secure in the knowledge that Dan will never read them, never refute even one single point, and continue to insist that the answers to his questions do not exist anywhere and have never been addressed.
Post a Comment