Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Fun Election News

 https://twitter.com/polishprincessh/status/1770424923242017057?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

This seems bad.  Is it bad?  Is that not supposed to happen?

 https://twitter.com/collinrugg/status/1784333756738031876?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

This also seems like it could be bad.  Is it bad?  Are these actions acceptable and encouraged?  

 https://twitter.com/collinrugg/status/1784333756738031876?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw

These seem like really shitty poll numbers.  

 

 

3 comments:

Marshal Art said...

Your second and third links are the same stuff. In fact, these two links are the same link as was in the post above this one, which was supposed to show something about bad coverage of muslims when they kill other muslims or Christians. Don't know how this is happening for you, but at least in this case it seems to relate to the first link of the three. Sounds like evidence enough to impact the outcome of the 2020.

Craig said...

It could be. Unfortunately, that doesn't change anything. It does give the GOP things to focus on during 2024 though.

Marshal Art said...

There are at least a few groups trying to address the problem of fraud. I don't know how much good they're doing, though one in particular seems to have a solid method of uncovering issues which can be directly addressed. It seems to have played a roll in the Wisconsin situation which resulted in Ron Johnson winning a tight race which could have gone against him without the intervention of the group. Jay Valentine is the founder, and claims he has been banned from AmericanThinker, though his articles can still be found there by a search of his name among the many contributors. I once emailed him for info, as I liked what I had read and hoped to promote him to my state and local governments. His response conveyed what I felt was an unnecessarily defensive or combative tone. I get emails from his outfit and he does get snarky. This might have something to do with why he was banned from AT, if indeed he actually has been. But I think his attitude is provoked by frustration with not only the clear cases of fraud so prevalent throughout the nation, but with what he regards as ineffective measures to combat it which often are after the fact methods which don't result in reversals or re-votes.

Even with this dude's methods, the time is now and that time is running out to mitigate the cheating. But I like his angle, which is comparing voter roles with property tax rolls to determine of mail-in ballots are actually being sent only to legitimate destinations. That alone would severely reduce the ability of Dems to cheat.

In any case, his outfit is Omega4America.com.