https://x.com/hazelappleyard_/status/1970863097670947149?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
The aspect of the "trans" agenda that the zealots don't want to talk about.
https://x.com/journalismseen/status/1971099473024778569?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
I mean he IS a scientific expert and all of that, and don't we slavishly listen to the experts?
8 comments:
The hateful Charlie Kirk addressed this warning to a "trans" person at one of his events. He encouraged her to focus on the feelings and work to resolve them before choosing the more threatening probabilities of surgeries and hormones.
I've heard and read these types of testimonies for some time now. There's this one old dude, whose name escapes me, who had "de-transitioned" and began warning others against doing what he found to be a really bad idea. Among the suicides are those who are filled with regret after putting themselves through only to realize it did not lead to the results for which they had hoped. I would not be surprised that most of the post surgery suicides are heavily influenced by this sad realization. Most were likely suicidal prior, but the failure to find the surgeries didn't provide simply added to it. Very sad.
Those who rail against opponents of these "sex reassignment" surgeries ignore these testimonies. They've been around for quite a while now so that there is no excuse for those feigning compassion for these sad and pathetic people.
We need to hear more of these stories. The zealots push the irreversible, surgical, pharmaceutical options as a panacea for confused children and young adults. Of course so much of the encouragement comes from those who have a financial incentive in the Trans Medical Industrial Complex. Why stop the millions upon millions of dollars that comes from pushing confused young people into irreversible mutilation.
I know this may highlight where we part company on this issue, but I think part of the problem is that the LGBs would have to be reassessed with regard to their claims about themselves, which are almost identical in the "can't help how I feel" aspect of their claims. That is to say, to expose the flaws of one can't help but shine a light on the flaws of the other given how similar their claims are.
More importantly with regard to this specific issue is that for a young person to be drawn in to the "T" part of the equation, the dangers are truly irreversible. At least for the LGBs, there's less physical damage which is so life altering.
But hey...kids are sexual beings, right? We can't deny them a thing, right?
I'd suggest that the LGB folx are simply using the parts they were born with for purposes other than intended. I'd argue that this is not much different than any other sexual sin. People are taking that which YHWH created to be used on one context, and using it in another. Which, is pretty much any sin. Taking something created good, and using it in unintended ways. While the "T" folx are destroying perfectly functioning parts to accommodate what they believe to be true rather than what is True.
To acknowledge the good of the decoupling, does not automatically validate the LGB folx. It merely acknowledges that they've come to realize that being coupled to the "T" agenda and the "trans" Medical Industrial Complex and/or the rising justification for pedos, is a good thing. If the LGBs, and the underlying narrative that goes with them, gets pulled out from under the "T", then the "T" loses some legitimacy.
You note the obvious physical damage that the "T" life does to young people, which the LGB folx do not have. Not that the LGB folx don't have health issues that go along with the lifestyle or domestic violence issues, but it's not part and parcel of the lifestyle.
Any alternative expression of sexuality (adultery, prostitution, sex slavery, pedophilia, LGB, "T", necrophilia, or bestiality) is life altering, it's just a question of how much.
To your first paragraph, it's just a matter of degrees, with the Ts going to an extreme with the misuse of their parts.
To the 2nd, to what extent the LGBs have "de-coupled" from the pedo crowd is not entirely known at this time, though I acknowledge that not all of them have a positive or neutral opinion of it. I'll give them a pat on the back for doing what moral people ought to do. But they can separate themselves all they like. I will not separate them as I see them as variations on the same theme... because they are.
For the third, this too is a matter of extremes, as so far as I've been able to determine, only lifespan expectation has improved for the LGBs with advancements in treatment of HIV (long delayed thanks to Anthony Fauci). Normal people don't have health issues that go along with the lifestyle of the LGBs and domestic violence issues are more common as well. (I recall Law Enforcement testimony that domestic violence was more severe with homosexual/lesbian couples)
If you think that putting tab A in slot C (when tab A, and slots B & C already exist), is just a few degrees of separation from cutting off healthy body parts, I can't help that. I guess mutilating healthy body parts and distorting body chemistry is "misusing", but "misusing" certainly undersells the damage.
That is correct. As I note, they are currently coupled to the pedo folx because the pedo folx are piggy backing on the LGB arguments. At some point, you'd hope that the LGB folx would consciously decouple themselves but the fact that they are decoupling at all, seems like a good idea.
The alphabet lifestyle brings with it multiple health concerns besides AIDS, it also brings higher rates of domestic abuse, higher rates of divorce, and other outcomes that most would consider negative. The evidence of all of these outcomes is robust.
Again, for clarity, I agree that (from a Biblical/Christian worldview regarding SIn) that all sexual sin (obviously not including rape/sexual abuse/sex slavery) is created pretty equal. I don't see how it can be argued that "misuse" of our bodies to engage in sexual activities beyond our design, is not all bad. Every single sexual sin starts with placing one's human judgement above that of YHWH. Really, that's the start of pretty much all sin. "Did YHWH really say, that sex is reserved for marriage between one man and one woman?" Is pretty much the beginning of every sin involving sex. You could argue degrees if that makes you happy, but that's essentially what Dan is doing with his "minor sin" bullshit. Is masturbation a "minor sin" and gay sex a "major sin"? As I see it, it's all sin, and it all can be repented of and forgiven.
Don't know why you felt "just a few degrees" accurately represents what I said, but whatever. But degrees of misuse is irrelevant to the fact that they all misuse their body parts. This makes them all birds of a feather and thus deserving to be grouped as one.
I would disagree with this as well, based on articles I've read which highlight the historical connection of "minor attraction" with the homosexual movement. I think it's more accurate to state that in recent years there's been a push by some who disapprove to distance themselves from the rest. I would also insist that such distancing is an attempt to further normalize their abnormality, just as they try to distance themselves from the more outrageous marchers in "Pride" parades and festivals. Like Rick Grennell, they regard themselves by the oxymoronic "normal gay people".
Yes. There's really no medical way to say it's all the same. "Gay" sex carries way more risk without even getting into the various diseases.
Indeed. One needn't worry about "major" or "minor" if one is devoted to avoiding both in favor of pleasing God.
Maybe when you said that it's "just a matter of degrees". I mean you could describe 359 degrees as "just a matter of degrees" if you'd like.
I guess I see engaging in activities that are exactly the same as a hetro couple could as significantly different than lopping off perfectly functioning body parts and construction non functional replacements. But that's me.
The whole movement is based on making each predilection "more normalized". It's why they all use the same arguments.
Obviously there has always been a "minor attracted" section of both hetro and homo sexuals. That we're seeing an attempt to normalize sex with children across the board seems problematic. As far as my earlier comment, it should go without saying that the failure of the "mainstream" of either "orientation" to stigmatize pedos will be a problem.
Post a Comment