https://x.com/datarepublican/status/1967821704438354295?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1967947208193343545?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/what-we-know-about-the-armed-queers-group-under-scrutiny-in-charlie-kirk-investigation/ar-AA1MIU66?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Why wouldn't the ani gun left be speaking out loudly against a group called "Armed Queers SLC"?
What could possibly go wrong?
To be fair, I have no objection to anyone exercising their second amendment right to own firearms. But, c'mon where this group seems analogous to the "right wing extremist" groups the left constantly has their panties in a wad about. Except these folx are not off in the woods wanting to be left alone.
2 comments:
I agree. For a perv to arm up due to legitimate fears of potential harm against the perv's person is no different than normal people bearing arms due the potential for harm where they are.
But this group seems to be a definite threat, based solely on its ideological animus toward our American way of life.
To be clear. I have no objection to anyone availing themselves of their 1A right to bear arms. This group seems to have definite terrorist connections/leanings, which is a whole other level.
Post a Comment