"No one banned Jimmy Kimmel from every major social media platform.
That happened to President Donald J. Trump.
No one tried to throw Jimmy Kimmel in jail for daring to speak his mind.
That happened to Trump.
And no one ever fired a bullet at Jimmy Kimmel.
That happened to Trump.
And it happened to Charlie Kirk… who paid the ultimate price for daring to stand boldly for truth and for this country.
What happened to Jimmy Kimmel?
His bosses at a corporate media empire decided he wasn’t profitable anymore.
That’s it.
His “edgy comedy” stopped drawing ratings, advertisers weren’t impressed, and the suits pulled the plug.
That’s not censorship.
That’s the free market at work.
But let’s not confuse that with what conservatives face every single day.
Donald
Trump was systematically deplatformed… erased from the digital public
square because Silicon Valley thought Americans shouldn’t hear him.
Charlie Kirk was assassinated for speaking his mind… gunned down because his faith and patriotism inspired millions.
Regular
conservatives across this country have lost jobs, been “canceled,”
silenced, and targeted for nothing more than refusing to bow to the mob.
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.
But here’s the truth: the consequences should come from the people, not from a ruling elite that rigs the system.
If you bomb on TV, the audience tunes out. If you’re unfunny, the market moves on.
That’s what happened to Jimmy Kimmel.
His ratings tanked.
His bosses looked at the numbers and saw the writing on the wall.
The advertiser-coveted 18–49 demographic—the one that keeps shows alive—collapsed.
Kimmel averaged only 129,000 viewers in that bracket this August.
That’s down from 212,000 in January and less than half of his June peak of 284,000.
That’s a nosedive.
Advertisers bailed.
Audiences tuned out.
And ABC saw him for what he was: unprofitable.
But when you are silenced, banned, jailed, or shot for your political beliefs—that’s not “consequences.”
That’s tyranny.
That’s persecution.
That’s an attack on the very fabric of America.
The left wants to blur the line.
They want you to think losing a TV contract is the same as being stripped of your voice, your freedom, or your life.
Don’t fall for it.
Kimmel’s problem is ratings.
Trump’s problem is a corrupt system that will do anything to stop him.
Charlie’s problem was that he was so effective, so fearless, so inspiring, that evil targeted him with deadly violence.
Kimmel’s story is the story of a washed-up entertainer who couldn’t cut it.
Trump’s story is the story of a man hounded, prosecuted, and even shot at for daring to fight for you.
Charlie’s story is the story of a Christian warrior taken from us because he refused to be silent.
We are at a crossroads. One side cheers when conservatives are silenced.
The other side—the side of freedom—believes that even when we disagree, the answer is more speech, not less.
That’s the America we’re fighting for.
So no, Jimmy Kimmel isn’t a victim.
He’s a failed late-night host whose corporate handlers tossed him aside.
The real victims are the conservatives who are banned, prosecuted, silenced, and even killed because they dared to speak truth.
We will not be silenced.
We
will not back down. And we will not let the media gaslight us into
thinking Kimmel’s firing is anywhere near the persecution faced by
Trump, Charlie, and millions of patriots across this country.
We are all Trump.
We are all Charlie.
And together, we are the movement they cannot cancel."
Ken Blackwell
2 comments:
I see so many spot on commentaries by Blackwell on FB. He's awesome.
I think by the time Kimmel spoke stupidly about the Kirk murder, he was already as good as gone and his vile rhetoric was simply the last straw.
I mentioned earlier about Clay Travis weighing in on this as a form of the cancel culture he opposes which he contrasts with a company/boss dismissing an employee who isn't making money for the company. He rightly has no problem with the latter, even though he might personally feel bad for the nice guy who couldn't make the grade. But in a case like Kimmel's, setting aside his already dismal ratings, if the speech or behavior of an employee is seen as likely to hurt the bottom line, to dismiss that person is preemptively the same thing as one who's speech or behavior has proven to hurt the bottom line.
Kimmel wasn't funny. It's hard to believe he was actually paired with Adam Corolla for a time (AC is not Dave Chappell level funny, but he still does provide laughs despite also being more political than he used to be). Part of the reason he wasn't funny was his choice to be political in a highly partisan way. Humor requires truth to a significant degree to provoke hearty laughter. With politics, especially when the point is to simply attack someone because of the victim's politics, only those who believe the message of the comic will laugh. Those who support the victim won't because they know what the joker (pun intended), such as Kimmel, is saying is not true. They can't relate, so they don't laugh.
Based on what I've seen Kimmel's ratings were in the tank anyway.
I keep hearing people saying that he's been "silenced" which is an insane claim to make. The notion that he's got a 1A right to a late night show is absolutely nuts.
Carson was correct in his choice to avoid politics on the Tonight show. While I don't particularly like the show, Fallon seems to minimize his political stuff and when he does go there he takes shots at both sides.
There's a video of some guy doing a bit that Kimmel did years ago, where he walks up to random women as asks if they'll have sex with him. It's amusing.
Post a Comment