https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1423659805402408
This is the best that the left has to offer.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2022343918511112
Feeeeeeeeeelings, nothing more that Feeeeeeeeelings.
https://x.com/defiantls/status/1966970142522585460?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
They brought out the genius right here.
https://x.com/katee_k1/status/1965804501476253957?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
Well educated, indeed.
It's doubtful that Dan will watch these, and likely that he'll complain that these people are being made fun of. To which I say that they chose to walk up to a mic and dialogue with someone who's got his shit together and they chose to act like morons. Of course we should make fun of them. They are the poster children for why college should not be for everyone.
4 comments:
Charlie was never the one being an ass but he had a lot of asses attacking him. I've seen many, many videos with his debates and the LEFT is too often unhinged like the one here.
What is amazing in these videos and in the series where they surround 1 conservative with 20 liberals is the rarity of actual arguments based in logic. Strangely enough, these idiots think that their garbage arguments based on their feelings are somehow impenetrable.
The fact that these are regularly accompanied by "You didn't go to college" is an argument against a college education for a significant number of people.
Indeed. The claim...Dan made it as well, if I'm not mistaken...is that these poor kids step up to the mic unprepared and, I guess, somehow that was something Charlie did? Is there any evidence that he only allowed the stupidest university students to engage with him? It's as you said. Kirk was the known commodity actually opening himself up to be schooled by university students...students about whom Kirk knew nothing. It's absurd, as are all leftists who criticized Kirk.
It's as if people like Dan and his ilk don't accept that these young adults have agency or responsibility for their actions. That they are stupid, uneducated, unprepared to argue facts over feelings, and step up to the mic is 100% their problem. How effective would TPUSA's events be if they were just a giant echo chamber?
Kirk repeatedly suggested that these fools bring professors down to argue in their places, but they didn't. What I think this reveals is the ASPL obsession with credentialism and "experts". That they blindly assume that a freshman who's majoring in Underwater Basket Weaving is automatically more intelligent, prepared, and educated that Kirk is simply the arrogance instilled by the left based on their reverence for credentials.
The best examples of this are the "98% of scientists" hoax and the "9/11 hoax" in both cases they compiled a bunch of people with credentials, but not expertise. "Scientists" with no training or experience in areas related to climate are no better than laymen, likewise "Engineers" who's expertise is not in structures, forensics, or materials bring little to the conversation about 9/11. The fact that architects were included invalidates the whole list.
Kids have been brainwashed by the left (the academy) that the only measure of intelligence and worth is the spend (finance) tens of thousands of dollars to get a college degree, even if that debt actually harms their ability to accomplish much.
Kirk was following in a proud tradition of those who educated themselves like Jefferson and Lincoln, that he was demeaned for that is the problem of the ASPL, not Kirk.
Post a Comment