https://x.com/danburmawy/status/1942404445746147480?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
"In 1378 CE, a Muslim named Muhammad Sa’im al-Dahr defaced one of humanity’s most iconic monuments the Great Sphinx of Giza. He saw it as an idol and that it offended Islamic teachings against graven images. In 2011 when the Muslim Brotherhood briefly took power in Egypt, calls to cover or destroy ancient Egyptian statues, including the Sphinx, resurfaced. In Syria, ISIS bulldozed Palmyra, a UNESCO World Heritage site, smashing priceless pre-Islamic artifacts. In Iraq, they obliterated the ancient city of Nineveh. In Lebanon, statues of the Virgin Mary or different saints are regularly vandalized even in Christian-majority areas. Across the Islamic world, Catholics and followers of other religions that permit statues are forbidden from publicly displaying them. Islam is a system frozen in a 7th-century ideological frame, unable to tolerate competing identities, symbols, or interpretations of the world. Other religions that reject idol worship, such as Judaism or Protestant traditions, do so by refraining from creating or venerating statues themselves. They don’t make it their mission to obliterate the cultural heritage of others.
But Islam operates differently. It doesn’t merely discourage idolatry for its own adherents, it seeks to enforce its definitions of blasphemy, modesty, and worship on everyone, believer or not. Islam inserts itself into every layer of society, public and private, past and present. This should be one of the thousands of signs of what Islam would do in the West if ever granted enough power to enforce its worldview."
The number of historical sites and artifacts destroyed by Muslims is vast, that their religion is so insecure that it's followers feel the need to conquer nations and destroy cultures tells us much about their belief.
Thank God for Jan Sobieski.
https://x.com/peterstopcrime/status/1942256900369678706?s=51&t=cLq01Oy84YkmYPZ-URIMYw
This is one more example of a "justice system" that bends over backwards to avoid offending Muslims. This is simply beyond vile. That this scum was released because the 10 YEAR OLD BOY didn't "say no" is bullshit. In what freaking world is it acceptable to rape a 10 YEAR OLD BOY and walk free. This is vigilante justice level stuff. I would have absolutely no problem if this kids parents hunted this vermin down and castrated him with a very dull knife.
I'm sick and tired of hearing ASPLs bitch about their commitment to justice, while simultaneously making excuses for this sort of Muslim bullshit.
Justice being blind IS a Biblical concept, unless your a Muslim. In which case, feel free to rape as much as you want. I'm beyond deporting these scum, death is the only appropriate option. If they want to expedite the process, load them in a C-17 get up to 30,000 feet over the Med, open the back ramp, and go into a steep climb.
16 comments:
When an author leads with a false claim intended as part of an attack on a whole religion, that's a big strike against that author.
https://www.historyhit.com/who-broke-the-giant-sphinxs-nose/
Also, of course, iconoclasm is not isolated to some Muslims. Christians also have destroyed structures/icons.
"Between 1566 and 1567, a campaign by Franciscan missionaries destroyed another 300 Hindu temples in Bardez (North Goa). In Salcete (South Goa), approximately another 300 Hindu temples were destroyed by the Christian officials of the Inquisition..."
"Over the course of the last decade [1990s] a fairly large number of Buddhist temples in South Korea have been destroyed or damaged by fire by Christian fundamentalists. More recently, Buddhist statues have been identified as idols, and attacked and decapitated in the name of Jesus."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iconoclasm
etc.
Of course, biblically, we have God ordering the destruction of sites holy to other religious traditions.
"Josiah got rid of the mediums and spiritists, the household gods, the idols and all the other detestable things seen in Judah and Jerusalem."
2 Kings 23
Since you hold a rather literalist understanding of histories told in the Bible, would you agree with those Muslims who would say that at least sometimes, it IS a good thing to destroy holy sites and idols?
Also:
Al-Azhar: Sunni Islam's leading institution, issued a statement declaring the destruction of heritage sites "forbidden in Islam and rejected in total…[and is] a major crime against the whole world".
more...
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-05660-4_14
Also, your second story is almost certainly not factually correct.
No, because I am able to distinguish between a command from thousands of years ago and whether or not it's applicable in 2025.
It's strange that you can't come up with better examples to counter the wide spread destruction of historic and religious sites that the freaking Inquisition, and some random incidents in Korea from 40 years ago.
The presence of a few outliers, doesn't disprove the fact that Islam has a long history of destroying the religious sites of other religions as they conquered.
Again, one outlier statement against centuries of actions, isn't definitive.
Well, if you say so. Strangely enough, a quick Google search of actual news sources disagrees with you.
FYI, the larger point remains, Muslims is Europe get held to a different standard of "justice" than Europeans. That the issue of a 10 year old boy consenting to sex is even an issue in this sort of case, defies any notion of justice.
The destruction of statues and other relics or representations of other religions by islamists is just one example of the islamic determination to force compliance with their beliefs. It continues today in ways not common of other religions. Unlike other religions (and with regard to islam, I use the term "religion" very loosely), islam is a threat to all other religions in a most direct manner. The organic spread of other faiths, Christianity for example, is only a threat by virtue of displacement, not of direct force.
It's strange that apologists for Islam like to pretend that Islam is not a religion built almost entirely on conquest and totally eliminating the culture of the lands they brutally conquered. They also like to pretend that Spain was somehow stolen from the Muslims, while ignoring the fact that the Muslims stole it first.
Craig:
It's strange that apologists for Islam like to pretend that Islam is not a religion built almost entirely on conquest and totally eliminating the culture of the lands they brutally conquered.
...he said, ironically missing out on a good portion of Jewish and Christian history. Just ask the native peoples of this continent. And many others.
Those who fail to read and understand history are doomed to repeat it, little brother.
[BIG eye roll!]
You see, the RIGHT answer to all these questions and topics is:
Good people should consistently come down against abusive, molesting, oppressing religious extremism, whether that's in Muslim history, Christian, Jewish, Mormon or Zoroastrianism.
Be consistent. Just oppose oppressive, harmful religious extremism, period. Stop picking out one religion to abuse and accuse. That's (ironically) precisely what religious extremists have always done.
Consistency has its advantages.
Again with the condescending "little brother" bullshit. You've been asked nicely to stop that crap, yet you continue. From now on any comments with that condescending bullshit will be deleted. It's your choice, so don't blame anyone but yourself when it happens.
If one is going to condescendingly prate on about reading history, then one should not be so selective.
Every society in history has engaged in conquest. In some cases that conquest improved things, in some cases it did not.
That this is your best response to ignore the reality that Islam as a religion which is primarily spread via conquest, forced conversion, and genocide, is your choice.
I'm confused by your use of the term "accuse" in this context. Is it accusatory to look at the hard data for things like rapes and the demographic groups that have the highest rates of rape? Is it accusatory to point out the threatening "protests" at various Christian churches over the last couple of weeks? Is it accusatory to post clerics advocating for things like rape, conquest, genocide, subjugation, and imposition of Sharia on non believers?
The problem you have is not that I'm "accusing" anyone of anything, it's that I'm simply pointing out the obvious. That you choose to ignore the obvious and remain silent is your problem.
Of course the "RIGHT" answer really is to follow the precept of Leviticus 19:15.
“‘Do not pervert justice; do not show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly."
Stop perverting the "justice system" to protect those who rape children or to attack one's political enemies.
Dan needs to really study the history of Islam, which is a political/religious system vs a religion.
There is much that Dan needs to study. The history of Islam, the current state of Islam, the actions of 3rd world primarily Muslim immigrants in Europe, current events, and the two tiered "justice system" in the UK and other European countries to start.
For someone who prates on and on about "justice" his silence on the total lack of justice in cases like the rape of a 10 year old boy, and hundreds of girls in the UK, speaks volumes abut his commitment.
Dan does ignore far more reasonable requests from us than he demands be respected of his at his Blog of Lies and Perversions. He does so on the lie that he's using terms of endearment when we see it for the condescension it is. What makes it especially bad is how unjustly he believes himself of superior moral understanding without having a true basis for any moral understanding at all.
Dan's MO is to demand much, and provide little. He has no problem demanding things of others, that he does not expect from himself. He does seem to base his "moral understanding" in various subjective factors all of which are completely grounded within himself. This is why he's effectively banned me from his cesspool, and why I wouldn't waste time there otherwise.
Post a Comment