As the days and weeks go by, we keep seeing more and more people testifying under oath regarding the dealings of the Biden family. Leaving aside the questions of why these people weren't testifying in front of the prosecutor that cut Hunter such a sweetheart deal, I have a question.
How much witness testimony under oath will it take before the Biden supporters acknowledge that their sainted Joe Biden might not be quite as ethical as they thought?
7 comments:
As SOON as any data comes out that implicates J Biden in crimes, I will support him being removed from office.
If he's just found to have engaged in the sort of legal but questionably ethical behavior that some have engaged in, I will REMAIN supportive of changing our rules to improve ethics guidelines for our elected officials, for our judges and justices and for the extended families of those in power, to the degree that we can legally do so. I've supported this for years.
But once again, and as always, it's hard to take conservative concerns about J Biden seriously when they've by and large given a pass to an obvious conman/pervert/corrupt individual devoid of moral character.
And if, in J Biden's case, it turns out that he truly has done nothing wrong, then I would hope that those who've regularly implied that there "probably" is something going on will admit that they were wrong for harping on a good man, suggesting that he's "probably" engaged in criminal activity.
But that we would support J Biden being held accountable and DENOUNCE those liberals who supported him IF AND WHEN illegal activity were discovered, that would be the difference between modern progressives and modern "conservatives," who simply don't have any moral credibility any more.
Part of the reason that we don't really expect any indictment of J Biden is that, 1. He's always presented as a decent fella and, 2. The conservatives have cried wolf so loud and long over J Biden, H Biden, H Clinton, B Clinton, Obama, etc, etc... ALL when there was never any serious wrongdoing done that, again, the conservatives have lost all credibility. And that they do these ACTUAL costly "witch hunts" repeatedly with NO serious wrongdoing being found WHILE ignoring their great pervert/conman in chief just makes it even more difficult to take them seriously.
Can you at least understand WHY we aren't especially worried/why we don't take as credible or serious about these endless allegations and hints of "wrongdoing..." coming from the modern GOP?
Do you recognize and understand why most people consider Trump an historically dishonest and corrupt and inept criminal/borderline criminal?
"Can you at least understand WHY we aren't especially worried/why we don't take as credible or serious about these endless allegations and hints of "wrongdoing..." coming from the modern GOP?"
Well, if these allegations weren't the result of actual testimony given under oath, by people about who we have no real knowledge regarding their political background you might have a point. But this testimony, again under penalty of perjury, is coming from IRS employees, business associates, and people who would seem to be aligned with the Biden's so it seems cavalier to dismiss this testimony based on bias driven hunches.
"Do you recognize and understand why most people consider Trump an historically dishonest and corrupt and inept criminal/borderline criminal?"
As I've written quite a bit on Trump's moral failings, in particular his tenuous connection to honesty, I'd suggest that you already know the answer. But more important, I'm impressed that you moved into trying to change the subject so quickly. This post is about the testimony that has been and is coming from witnesses who are testifying under oath. How about we stick with the topic.
FYI, I love how you excuse every single bit of this by claiming that Biden is "presenting" as a good guy. Ignore the long and well documented history of lies and plagiarism, and his repeated unseemly interactions with women, it's enough that he seems like a nice guy.
Oh, excellent job of ignoring the many issues of the rouges gallery you mentioned, while failing to acknowledge that most of the accusations against Trump were demonstrated to be lies perpetrated by the Clinton campaign.
I'm not going to parse your second comment. It's just more of the same old bullshit. It sounds good, but it's just you setting some absurdly high standards for the guy on your side.
I can't help but note that you haven't addressed any of the actual testimony that's been offered, nor have you offered any proof that those who are testifying under oath and risking the penalties for perjury have testified falsely or are somehow plants of the GOP.
Maybe you could stick to the topic.
For one who uses the term "delusional" so often to denigrate better people with far more fact-based positions, Dan is truly one delusional dude as his pro-Biden comments clearly prove. "Decent fella"! That's hilarious!
Post a Comment