What in the name of all that is holy is the "bipartisan" "border security" bill that's coming out of the senate? It's more interested in protecting the borders of Ukraine than of the US. How in the world is setting a "limit" on illegal immigration that can be ignored, and redefining "asylum" going to make things better?
What a joke.
I'm seeing reports that this hideous piece of crap "border security" bill was primarily negotiated by Mitch McConnell, but that he's thrown Lankford and others under the bus by putting them out in front. It also sounds like Mitch is having increasing mental acuity and other health issues as well. Yet, some people think that the voters of KY should be able to keep voting for him no matter what. He's becoming another example of why some sort of age limits might be worth considering for congress.
4 comments:
It's what you get for voting Demokrat and for continuing to vote in RINOS. I consider this treason.
That's why I'm considering voting for Giant Meteor this year. Art says we can't impose term limits because we have to let idiots keep voting these morons back into office for decades. But obviously we need to send more money for Ukrainians and weapons manufactures to skim, than we spend on the USMC.
This could be a turning point this close to an election.
NO. That's a Dan-like misrepresentation of my position on term limits. But you do you.
In the meantime, the bill is crap and is another case of mixing issues on one single bill. Now, the spin is that those who oppose the BS border nonsense wants Putin to win, as if we should care which despot wins that fight.
No, it's more like an exaggerated, sarcastic, snarky, paraphrase of your position.
But the bill is still absurd.
Post a Comment