https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/02/26/exclusive-female-inmate-forced-to-bunk-with-masturbating-transgender-prisoner-who-raped-daughter-messages-claim/?utm_source=ground.news&utm_medium=referral
Dude, who claims to be a woman, convicted of raping his daughter ends up in a women's prison. What could possibly go wrong with that arrangement. It's almost like the state just put this sexual offender in the equivalent of an all-you-can-eat buffet.
13 comments:
This is what happens because the culture refuses to accept biology over emotions.
Can you find any actual news sources that report this story? All I can find are right wing sites. Again, if the ONLY sources for a story are not actual news groups, the story might be false. He'll, I can't even find a Fox coverage of this. Red flag.
Dan
Dan
Certainly a target rich environment of soft targets!
But at least his "identity" is respected and that's all that ever really counts. Nothing else. Just him...er, her...er...screw it....him.
"Can you find any actual news sources that report this story?"
Are you simply assuming that the facts reported are wrong because you decided that the reporter didn't work for a Dan approved news outlet?
This is NOT the first time something like this has been reported.
I'll tell you what. When you stop providing left wing sites, you will be free to make this an issue.
https://wsau.com/2023/08/25/more-than-half-of-transgender-inmates-in-wisconsin-have-been-convicted-of-a-sex-crime/
https://www.lawofficer.com/wisconsin-man-mark-campbell-raped-daughter-housed-female-prison-inmates/
https://news.wttw.com/2020/02/19/lawsuit-female-prisoner-says-she-was-raped-transgender-inmate
https://katv.com/news/nation-world/trans-inmate-transferred-moved-from-womens-prison-after-impregnating-2-report-says-transgender-prison-new-jersey-edna-mahan-demi-minor
I could go on, but the point of the post remains. What could possibly go wrong when placing a "trans" woman (with functioning male genitalia) in a prison full of biological women.
There are potential problems IF that's the case. I think you're missing the point: I can't find validation of the facts of the story in actual reputable known news sources. That you cite some unknown sources that may or may not be telling the facts of the story is meaningless.
Your first news source (WSAU) does appear to be a legitimate local news source. And I note that their story concludes:
"The Wisconsin DOC refused to confirm to The Daily Signal if it holds biological male inmates in female jails."
Your first source (Daily Signal) is a far right source that is listed as "unreliable."
I'm not sure about lawofficer.com, but it sounds like a source for those associated with policing, not necessarily a journalistic outfit. Maybe it is. I just don't know. Again, that's the problem with citing less well-known "sources," especially when they're mixed in with known bad actors like Daily Signal and WND (Wingnut Daily?).
In searching this story, I also found another "Mark Campbell" who was convicted as a child abuser in 2023, presumably NOT the "Mark Campbell" cited in your story as Nicole Campbell who's been presumably in prison for unknown reasons since 2012 or something (I'm forgetting the date).
The point being, you need to cite stories from credible sources if you want to have your opinions treated as credible.
"There are potential problems IF that's the case."
Yeah, biological men locked in prison with biological women is just rife with "potential" problems. What could possibly go wrong.
"I think you're missing the point: I can't find validation of the facts of the story in actual reputable known news sources. That you cite some unknown sources that may or may not be telling the facts of the story is meaningless."
No, you're missing the point. If you can't prove that the substance and the quotes in these stories are false, you are just applying your subjective "standard" to this as a means to dismiss it as a "potential problem". I'm not required to provide you with anything. Especially not to cater to your subjective assumption that everything that isn't from your secret list of approved media is automatically false, or meaningless.
"Your first news source (WSAU) does appear to be a legitimate local news source. And I note that their story concludes:
"The Wisconsin DOC refused to confirm to The Daily Signal if it holds biological male inmates in female jails.""
If you say so. But are the facts as reported wrong?
"Your first source (Daily Signal) is a far right source that is listed as "unreliable.""
Again, are the specific facts as reported in this specific story wrong?
"I'm not sure about lawofficer.com, but it sounds like a source for those associated with policing, not necessarily a journalistic outfit. Maybe it is. I just don't know. Again, that's the problem with citing less well-known "sources," especially when they're mixed in with known bad actors like Daily Signal and WND (Wingnut Daily?)."
Dan's prejudices and preconceptions shine brightly.
"The point being, you need to cite stories from credible sources if you want to have your opinions treated as credible."
The GREAT AND MIGHTY DANTHUSTERA HAS SPOKEN!!!!!!!!! Ignore his commands at your peril.
I guess the fact that you conceded that placing biological men in women's prisons might possibly be a "potential problem" is a tiny bit of a hint that you really find "trans" women raping biological women in prisons to be wrong. Your constrained by your support of the Narrative not to actually admit that. I get it.
Actually, I've read of many similar incidents in prisons around the country is states who decide men pretending to be women should be in women's prisons and then women are raped. Total stupidity. The women should sue big time.
What Dan chooses to pretend isn't reality, the "reputable" news sources he demands are only those which can be trusted are the very news sources least likely to report these types of stories because they accept the lies of multiple genders, that biological men can actually be women and this entire concept isn't abject lunacy. These stories are incredibly inconvenient for the pro-perv narrative. Dan loves the pro-perv narrative. He loves it so much he pretends womanizing men are perverts and the only perverts there are.
Art,
Obviously, the news sources Dan approves of are unlikely to report these types of stories because they don't fit the approved Narrative. So of course they get reported by independent journalists who are outside of the corporate media.
I remember when the growth of the internet was hailed because it would allow and encourage all sorts of independent journalism. The thought was that the ready availability of a medium that allows anyone to have a global reach, as well as the advent of cameras that are with us everywhere would open up all sorts of avenues for independent journalism. Along comes Dan and automatically shits on anyone that isn't a part of the journo club. Journalism degree from a left leaning school, employed by one of the global conglomerate news organizations (or by the government at NPR). Remember when the left was out to stick it to The Man? Now they ARE The Man. And, in Dan's world anyone who isn't beholden to The Man, is automatically not to be believed.
And of course, by citing some "fact-checking" type site which ranks news organizations...sites which themselves are not ranked and thus can only at best be assumed as reliable themselves...Dan pretends he can dismiss or question the veracity of any story reported by any his "sources" suggest are unreliable or disreputable, without making the least bit of effort to verify the story himself. Then, he'll only check out his preferred news organizations which won't bother covering such stories unless forced to do so by coverage from sources Dan rejects. Amazing.
I meant to add...
They're like Dan, who won't comment on anything unless compelled to do so by those like us.
Post a Comment