As the GA Trump trial debacle continues, evidence was introduced that seems to strongly indicate that both Wade and Willis are likely guilty of perjury.
They have phone records that demonstrate that the relationship began much earlier than when they testified under oath.
It's too bad, because I would have liked to have seen Trump win the GA case outright, but watching this train wreck is much more entertaining.
6 comments:
That would have been nice, sure. But it's far more important to the people of America that these sh*t shows be closed down ASAP. We can't have these abuses of the legal system running free as the abuses of power demonstrated by their kin in government.
I agree that corrupt governmental entities need to be shut down, and that this is but one example. However, I'd argue that Trump actually winning a fair trial would be a huge benefit to both him and his campaign.
Oh, absolutely and no doubt. And to see leftist faces melt as a result would be an enjoyable pleasure to witness. The problem with that of course is the negative impact on the running of that campaign. Even if he eventually wins it could hurt it, which is their true purpose. As much as the modern progressives in their grace embracing way would love to see Trump in prison, of most important to them is that he's not around to interfere with their destruction of America.
I'm not sure I agree. I suspect that Trump winning even one of these cases would only benefit him in his campaign. For him to be able to campaign on "See, I told you I wasn't guilty and that they were just trying to persecute me." would be incredibly effective IMO.
I agree that it's amusing to see these cases implode one by one and I suspect that if he drags them out beyond the election, that they'll magically fade away. If he wins, there are enough ways for him to pardon himself that it'll be pointless. If he loses, then it'll just be a waste of time and money.
I agree that wining in court is the ultimate middle finger to his attackers, next to winning back the presidency in November. I'm just concerned with the risks involved. Seeing the cases dismissed without a trial avoids those risks. Not a one of them should have been given the time of day by any honorable judge.
I agree that dismissal avoids the risks, but it also isn't a definitive (as definitive as a court win would be) ending.
I do enjoy the fact that the DFL has put so much energy into this lawfare and that it's all falling apart because of incompetence.
Now we're hearing complaints about the speed of SCOTUS taking Trump's appeal. The problem is that those who complain ignore the fact that the DFL sat on the case for @2 years before they brought charges, and that various left leaning judges have denied Trump due process along the way. I'll try to find the tweet thread and post it at some point.
Post a Comment