" Before we talk about Palestinian rights, let's talk about "Palestinians" responsibilities. Up to this point in history the pro-establishment of “Palestine” has not shown the world or even their children, accountability, responsibility, or seriousness in their attempt to build a nation. As of now, all they have proved is a selfish, untrustworthy, corrupt leadership. Asking for political status, power, and wealth. What is the point of a state without a nation? It is pathetic to continue begging for a political entity without serious work toward building a nation while dependent on international aid, stealing public resources in a desperate fight for global status. Instead of attachment to the golden seat, allow new blood to contribute towards building an independent economy, lay down the foundations of a nation, and finally get out of their way... Responsibilities come first, rights will naturally follow… 1- Decide on a legitimate, central leadership through democratic and transparent elections. (Gangs can’t build nations) 2-End the violent revolution and all forms of armed resistance. (Building nations requires peace and stability) 3-Vote on an independent, contemporary, civil constitution that guarantees: -The right to vote -Women rights -Free press and freedom of speech -Freedom of religion -Equal rights of the religious minorities 4-Separate Mosque and State 5-Recognize Israel’s right to exist 6-Criminalize all acts of violence: -Child abuse and child indoctrination -Honor killing (killing women for shame) -Violence against Jews and religious minorities -Discrimination against black people (Stop treating them like “Abeed” or slaves) -Killing opposition by the name of treason -Racism 7-Criminalize loyalty to any foreign entity 8-The rule of law: “No one is above the law” 9-Free the People from "Palestine". (Enslaving the people to political concepts is not progressive) The constitution is the foundation, concepts, and names secondary not primary. Without manifesting such principles, or failing to realize their essence, “Palestinians” will not qualify to have the status of a nation. Political gangs, terrorists, religious fanatics, and revolutionary rebels must be prohibited from ruling. Statehood is a responsibility, it is not ownership or privilege. True statesmen are born to serve not to be served. Armed resistance and political violence, intimidation, blackmailing, kidnapping, and assassinations don’t lead to nationhood. First, qualify as a nation, then ask for statehood. Global gangsters may not qualify even for the very basic human rights."
Mosab Hassan Yousef
5 comments:
Of course all this is in conflict with who and what those people are. They are not in any way the same as us and really don't seem to want to be, though they want much of the "stuff" we have. The only thing we can say with certainty is that they are not deserving of recognition on any level.
No discussion of statehood should ever take place without first seeing two, preferably three generations of peace and peace-promoting behavior by these people. They should not only recognize Israel's right to exist, they should defend Israel's right to exist as well. They should also admit they are not "Palestinian" and speak of themselves only in terms of their actual national origin (from which Arab nation do they come).
That goes without saying, but as a premise it makes a lot of sense. The notion that you can establish a nation based on wanton killing, attacking one's neighbors, annihilation of one's neighbors, hatred of infidels, kidnapping, rape, and destruction, should be anathema to our 21st century culture. Strangely enough, all too many liberals (who prate on about how important "human rights" are) shill for these vile, evil terrorists and put Iran in charge of both human rights and disarmament at the UN.
I can agree that statehood should be a process, not simply bestowed. Clearly Hamas and their subjects are not ready to live as a state in peace and harmony with their neighbors.
This quote points to a bigger problem among those on the left. They endlessly prate abut asserting their rights, with little regard to how those rights might negatively impact others. Beyond that they worship rights, with virtually no acknowledgement about the responsibilities that go along with those rights.
To your last comment, abso-freakin'-lutely.
To the previous comment, I would submit that statehood should be off the table until the process of reforming their hearts and minds is complete and manifested in their behaviors. That is, unless that's the process of which you speak.
I'd agree that statehood should be off the table until they demonstrate that they can play well with others, especially by dropping their demands for conquest and genocide
Post a Comment